"Raymond" <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:sqdsv3l3qlrmq7f0pdhbg87hsmr6r2cuef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:00:12 -0500, Jim Walsh
> <jSPAMimNwalshO3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:16:43 +1000, john wrote:
>>
>>> Did Tibetan have human right under their leader Dailai Lama during his
>>> reign in Tibet ?
>>
>>Let's consider this argument.
>>
>>I suppose the question is "If the Tibetans did not have human rights
>>under the DL, can they, nevertheless, complain about not having human
>>rights under the CCP"?
>
> Wrong argument. Tibetan people are living happily and freely at this
> moment. A handful political lamas can not speak for the people of
> Tibet, not to mention a former slave owner of Tibetan people.
Funny, if you look at the video that got past the censors, you see mostly
non-lamas doing all the destruction.
Happily and freely indeed....
|
