On 11 Apr 2008 03:07:03 -0500, "Toby" <kymarto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Raymond" <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:sqdsv3l3qlrmq7f0pdhbg87hsmr6r2cuef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:00:12 -0500, Jim Walsh
>> <jSPAMimNwalshO3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:16:43 +1000, john wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did Tibetan have human right under their leader Dailai Lama during
his
>>>> reign in Tibet ?
>>>
>>>Let's consider this argument.
>>>
>>>I suppose the question is "If the Tibetans did not have human rights
>>>under the DL, can they, nevertheless, complain about not having human
>>>rights under the CCP"?
>>
>> Wrong argument. Tibetan people are living happily and freely at this
>> moment. A handful political lamas can not speak for the people of
>> Tibet, not to mention a former slave owner of Tibetan people.
>
>Funny, if you look at the video that got past the censors, you see mostly
>non-lamas doing all the destruction.
>
>Happily and freely indeed....
>
Then you have to ask yourself, who is doing the censoring to filter
out those lama violences which do show up on privately owned youtube
videos. Those red lama clothes is hard to miss, you know.
|
