"Raymond" <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:20:16 -0700 (PDT), Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
> <markdemer150@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Apr 11, 8:53?pm, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:15:04 -0700 (PDT), Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>>>
>>>
>>> <markdemer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >On Apr 11, 1:44?pm, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:28:03 -0700 (PDT), Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
>>>
>>> >> <markdeme...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >On Apr 11, 11:05?am, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:32:21 -0700 (PDT), Ira IRa IRA Humperdink
>>> >> >> MD
>>>
>>> >> >> <markdeme...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >On Apr 10, 10:33?pm, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:51:00 -0700 (PDT), Ira IRa IRA
>>> >> >> >> Humperdink MD
>>>
>>> >> >> >> <markdeme...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >On Apr 10, 2:32?pm, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:49:28 -0700 (PDT), Ira IRa IRA
>>> >> >> >> >> Humperdink MD
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> <markdeme...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >On Apr 10, 6:15?pm, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:56:24 -0700 (PDT), Garret
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> <gar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >On Apr 9, 12:56?pm,Raymond<ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:58:08 +0200, "J.Venning"
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <J.Venn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> ><bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>news:96a14d9b-3949-4283-96e8-87e88381cd5f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Or how about the poster said, "Protect the
Flame.
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> All hail the CCP"?
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>In that case LT Lee would give a long response
with
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>lots of cut and
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>paste to explain why that is acceptable. By now no
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>one expects any
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>consistency from LT.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ? ?And in the case of Jimbo there, he claimed
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Homo***uality is normal !".
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >J.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Homo***uality is normal, you ignorant ass.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >That is a very queer statement. Why do you say that?
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >Just because you
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >are a homo***ual? Well, homo***uality is not normal.
It
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >is an
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >abnormality - a sickness. We cannot go around hunting
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >people down who
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >are abnormal, but we should not say that homo***uality
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >is normal. Are
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >you saying that it is normal just because you are a
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >homo***ual and you
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >think people should be like you?
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> Homo***uality is just like hetero***uality except their
>>> >> >> >> >> >> objective is
>>> >> >> >> >> >> different. A homo***ual can live a normal moral life
just
>>> >> >> >> >> >> like a
>>> >> >> >> >> >> hetero***ual can. On the other hand, when it's about
>>> >> >> >> >> >> immoral ***ual
>>> >> >> >> >> >> misconduct, both the hetero***ual and the homo***ual
will
>>> >> >> >> >> >> go to hell
>>> >> >> >> >> >> together as the exact equal.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> Therefore, stop judging homo***uality which is
obviously
>>> >> >> >> >> >> not your
>>> >> >> >> >> >> concern as a hetero***ual. It's your own ***ual conduct
>>> >> >> >> >> >> that you
>>> >> >> >> >> >> should worry about for your own sake.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >look, kiddo! say what you like, but you are not going to
>>> >> >> >> >> >convince
>>> >> >> >> >> >anyone that homos are normal - they're not. get to grips
>>> >> >> >> >> >with it.
>>> >> >> >> >> >homos are perverts!
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> The only thing that is perverted is your sick judgmental
>>> >> >> >> >> mind.
>>>
>>> >> >> >> >hey, kiddo! accept it - no one considers you normal. if you
>>> >> >> >> >are a
>>> >> >> >> >homo, not even your own parents!
>>>
>>> >> >> >> I don't need you to consider me normal. I know I'm normal.
It's
>>> >> >> >> you
>>> >> >> >> who should be alarmed by your own sick judgmental mind. What
is
>>> >> >> >> it
>>> >> >> >> that is keeping you from acknowledging something that does
not
>>> >> >> >> really
>>> >> >> >> concern you?
>>>
>>> >> >> >because i am an m.d., and i say homo***uality is not normal.
only
>>> >> >> >homos themselves try to force people to accept it as normal.
it's
>>> >> >> >not,
>>> >> >> >and no one else other than homos themselves will accept it as
>>> >> >> >normal.
>>> >> >> >get that into your thick head! what a great disappointment you
>>> >> >> >must
>>> >> >> >have been for your parents!
>>>
>>> >> >> You are only continue on your prejudice. You have not answered
my
>>> >> >> question. Let me repeat. What is it that is keeping you from
>>> >> >> acknowledging something that does not really concern you? Are
you
>>> >> >> scared that by acknowledging homo***uality as it is, you are in
>>> >> >> danger
>>> >> >> of becoming a homo***ual yourself? Are you homophobic?
>>>
>>> >> >your bad englishee is showing, kiddo! is that why you became a
homo?
>>> >> >they threw you out from school because of your poor grades?
>>>
>>> >> I can see you are running out of argument again.
>>>
>>> >> How nice. Thank you.
>>>
>>> >you never had any to start with, kiddo! you are just one of those
run-
>>> >of-the-mill losers.
>>>
>>> Well, I suppose that is the reason why winning is so sweet. Look, I
>>> don't ask much. I just need to beat you in a debate. Everything else
>>> is secondary.
>>
>>
>>i meet your type everyday. i send them to counseling, where they can
>>get better one-to-one sessions. you should ask your parents to send
>>you to counseling, and make better use of your life than waste it in
>>cyber space. you've got a bit of intelligence - put it to better use
>>for your family, friends, community, country, etc. who knows, you may
>>one day return to china and contribute you abilities to make it a
>>better place for all chinese to live in. now, that can't be too bad,
>>can it?
>
> You don't have to worry about that. Nothing can be better than serving
> my country in every way I can. That is the reason why I came here to
> kick you guys' *****, and it has been a joyful experience...
>
> :-)
I don't think anyone here is worried about you, so don't flatter
yourself! How many people do you think read your posts? 10? I doubt
it, many would have simply kill filed you sometime ago. So, how do you
"serve your country" by slinging mud at these people here? Do you
think that the CCP keeps a tab of how many guys' ***** you kick here
and will give you a plastic medal for it? Go home and serve your
country by working there for free. See how long you'll last!
|
