Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Kevin Rudd ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 44287 of 51938
Post > Topic >>

Re: Kevin Rudd - The leader we had to have

by netvegetable <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 14, 2008 at 04:16 PM

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:06:47 +1000, ralph wrote:

>>> WTF? Because I oppose closer ties with Chinese fascists, I must
>>> instead sup****t Australia unilaterally cutting off all trade with
>>> them.
>>
>>So what you oppose is "closer" trade ties? You're quite happy with
>>Australian trade with China being worth $56.2b/year, but no more because
>>that would immoral somehow?
>>
>>
>>> I can think of at least a third ... strange you can't.
>>
>>And what's that?
> 
> Instead of working toward closer ties with Chinese as you advocate ...

Tell me why not. We already do quite a lot of trade with China. I'm 
interested to know why you say: we should cap it at precisely $56.2 
billion per year. It's just that it seems like an arbitrary number.

> we should be using our ties with governments who share our commitment to
> democracy and human rights, and work with them on any number of fronts
> to keep abuses of human rights in the spotlight, especially on the scale
> they occur in China.  

That's why K-Rudd waited he was standing next to Shrub before he 
criticized China on HR. It was powerful symbolism. He was saying to the 
world, China included: "We stand shoulder to shoulder with our 
traditional allies, United States, on the issue of human rights in Tibet. 
Like it or lump it."

> Meanwhile, no reason to be increasing contact at
> government levels ... a good albeit minor start (since our new
> government loves symbolism) would be not to send any government
> representative to the opening ceremonies.
> 
> As for trade, of course unilateral trade sanctions on our part would be
> fruitless ... to be effective, sanctions require coordinated effort with
> other democratic governments.

What you are proposing is that we should work with other governments 
towards imposing multilateral sanctions on China. If Beijing even 
suspected something like that, they would do more than just break off all 
trade ties. Why shouldn't they try to destroy us in that situation? We 
would effectively be trying to destroy them. 

-- 
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet

Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are 
conservatives... John Stuart Mill
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Kevin Rudd - The leader we had to have
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-04-14 16:16:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 15:44:44 CDT 2008.