On Apr 16, 1:50 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:37:11 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> > When you said that you based your claim on NY Times,
> > I replied that NY Times like Straits Times is not always truthful.
>
> No one is perfect, but the NY Times has regularly demonstrated its
> independence from the US government while the Strait Times has never
> demonstrated any independence from the Singa****e government.
>
Who is saying anyone is perfect ?
What the **** are you talking about !
Of course, NY times is BIAS ...for the USA...bias
for US big business...bias to sell newspaper
and advertisements (by Jews and big business).
For this reason it is not ALWAYS turthful.
Who is saying NY time is not independent
from the US government ? You.
Then **** off...go and throw you **** somewhere
else.
The Straits time exist as an organ for the
Singa****e government.
Its re****ting is also highly bias....not always
truthful.
Just because the Straits Times is bias, it
is justified for NY Times not to be truthful.
What sort of logic is this ?
The NY Times display poor standard of journalism
as bad as the Straits Times. This is what I've
said.
In fact, most US paper and mass media suffer
from poor standard of journalism.
CNN just called the Chinese "goons and thugs"
Is this good journalism ?
|
