Re: Tibet closed to western media is just a way to say "No comment"

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:06:58 -0700, ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> On Apr 19, 8:03 pm, netvegetable <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:41:43 -0700, ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> > Scene 1:
>>
>> >  A man was getting off the car. And a bunch of reproters put the
>> >  many
>> > microphones onto the face of the man. The man push away the
>> > microphones and said "No comment."
>>
>> > Scene 2:
>>
>> > The phone rang. A man picked up the phone. And then he or she slam
>> > the phone down and said, "The god damned press again."
>>
>> > Both the above are common scenes in America and elsewhere. In the
>> > scenarios above, both men behaved the  way they did because they
felt
>> > a certain revulsion toward re****ters. Why? Simple reasons. Re****ters
>> > don't always tell the truth. They often lie and make things up.
>> > China's closing Tibet is no different from the man who said "No
>> > comment" and the man who slammed the phone down. As the men above
>> > will continue to have their lives talking with non-re****ters face to
>> > face or over the phone, China including Tibet will continue to allow
>> > people in and out of China includingn Tibet.
>>
>> The analogy is flawed. In this case, the man is saying "No Comment" on
>> behalf of somebody else - the people in Tibet. Would be nice if they
>> could say their own peace, unlike the monks in this video.
> 
> No, the analogy is not flawed. Tibet is part of China.

Well there Tibetans who disagree with you on that. Luckily for you 
though, they got locked up for speaking their mind, if not killed.

-- 
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet