Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Dalai Lama ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 754 Topic 44698 of 54005
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo

by Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPAMh3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 21, 2008 at 08:05 PM

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:27:23 +0800, Raymond wrote
(in article <g8to04t51e7pdfqgkpvuhb3oda9akvq3uc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:58:06 GMT, Robert Epstein
> <vze256xu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>> That is true control-freak-dom, when you need to rule over that which 
>> you don't believe exists.
> 
> The Chinese government is merely practicing the tradition of Chinese
> dynasty in respecting the backward, superstitious, and ridiculous
> Tibetan religious custom....

Disrespecting you mean.

-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----




 754 Posts in Topic:
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 13:21:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-21 13:23:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 05:51:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:19:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 "J.Venning" <  2008-04-21 08:15:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 sb5309@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-20 23:46:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:20:55 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 07:58:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 07:27:23 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 20:05:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:48:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:51:25 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:46:41 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 21:31:39 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:43:52 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 01:58:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:52:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 04:29:42 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:56:30 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 04:52:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:34:07 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:45:50 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:16:02 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:02:47 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:59:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:27:33 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:57:09 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:24:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:31:56 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 20:29:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 23:34:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 18:36:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:46:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 20:55:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 16:39:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 17:02:02 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 08:22:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 18:10:10 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:36:27 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:16:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:54:34 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:41:58 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:17:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD  2008-04-21 22:00:28 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:36:37 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:20:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:07:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:43:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:13:46 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 23:09:37 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:26:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:20:44 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 21:34:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 05:08:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-30 16:45:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-25 18:53:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:56:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 00:07:29 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 19:19:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:55:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 16:39:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:55:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:05:00 
Re: snakes in the house
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-30 01:40:24 
Re: snakes in the house
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-30 09:17:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:09:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:50:11 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:12:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:10:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:52:14 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:15:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:25:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:22:31 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-23 13:56:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 18:01:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 22:34:22 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 02:21:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:32:41 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:46:10 
Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:50:39 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:03:59 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:41:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:52:20 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:31:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:09:12 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:21:56 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:39:21 
Re: Just let people votey on the Internet.
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:47:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:30:10 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:45:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:53:37 
Re: simply not acceptable
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:07:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:07:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:56:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
 "OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-24 22:06:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:26:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 08:38:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:59:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:45:38 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:00:50 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:52:00 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:46:18 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-23 20:35:25 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:22:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:52:20 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:41:56 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 10:09:15 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:56:26 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:04:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:05:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:12:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 11:13:34 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:27:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:23:30 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:26:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Duke Lama <dukelama@[E  2008-04-24 22:35:10 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:18:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:36:44 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:22:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:24:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:49:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:39:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:23:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:43:11 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:47:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 09:53:23 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:34:42 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 11:37:36 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:14:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:10:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:01:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:17:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:21:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:26:33 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 06:24:24 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 10:07:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:44:08 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:12:17 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-27 19:10:12 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 01:20:28 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-28 19:27:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:32:57 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-28 19:43:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:43:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 10:57:50 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 06:44:50 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:00:05 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:14:52 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:29:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:04:57 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:27:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:55:29 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:25:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:38:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:58:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:35:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:16:28 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:23:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:39:59 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:07:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 "Julian" <Ju  2008-04-25 10:53:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:39:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 "Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:33:33 
The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 23:31:08 
Re: The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
 "Julian" <Ju  2008-04-28 22:53:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:00:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 "Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:56:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:08:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 12:53:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 20:01:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 21:06:25 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 19:50:14 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 08:23:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:08:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 02:04:36 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 16:23:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 00:03:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 01:43:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 09:13:39 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 13:57:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 14:00:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 13:47:09 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 21:40:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 19:50:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:41:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-24 19:17:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:53:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 21:26:50 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:58:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 22:46:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:21:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:26:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:23:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:35:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:32:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:38:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum or snakes in my house
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 11:20:31 
Re: snakes in the house
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:15:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:41:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 13:07:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-27 21:19:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 20:07:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:42:57 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 08:51:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 09:09:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 03:28:21 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 10:36:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:01:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 15:45:50 
Re: snakes in the house
 small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 19:01:43 
Re: snakes in the house
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 23:48:33 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:46:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 02:50:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:49:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:55:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-26 21:42:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 20:15:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:15:12 
The Chinese government is run by morons
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:42:18 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:02:28 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:39:57 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:17:34 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:08:50 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:39:24 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:21:23 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:24:43 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 16:39:41 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:13:20 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:34:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 "J.Venning" <  2008-04-24 20:41:04 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:21:39 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:59:02 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:32:14 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:54:05 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:13:00 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:29:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:25:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-22 21:43:33 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:37:02 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:52:55 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:20:26 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:48:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:13:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:34 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:44 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:07:31 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:10:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:20:21 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:32:29 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:36:29 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:53:13 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:05:10 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:58:46 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 11:16:15 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:21:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:44:03 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:52:26 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:51:57 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:46:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:23:23 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 17:15:32 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 14:34:18 
let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:47:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:18:30 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:13:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:07:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:51:09 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:20:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:16:58 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:11:33 
How do you explain the riots?
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:45:21 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:11:54 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:52:06 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:18:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:19:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:57:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:38 
Re: so silly
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:38:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-22 19:46:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:43:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:05:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 23:54:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:29:52 
Re: simply not acceptable
 bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:46:17 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:53:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:24:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:42:45 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:15:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:29:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:27:11 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:02:55 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:15:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:33:48 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:10 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:42:36 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:44 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:12:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:22:35 
Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are create
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-21 02:37:10 
The principle of "All men are created equal".
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 19:59:05 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
 "RussellT" <  2008-04-21 13:33:14 
Re: so silly
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:12:16 
Re: so silly
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:42:34 
Re: so silly
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:57:13 
Re: so silly
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:58:05 
Re: so silly
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:28:03 
Re: so silly
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 23:54:34 
Re: so silly
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:39:28 
Re: so silly
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:45:20 
Re: so silly
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 00:06:20 
Re: so silly
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:26:39 
Re: so silly
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 14:20:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:02:39 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:37:40 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:21:36 
Re: simply not acceptable
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 20:17:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:28:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:57:29 
Re: simply not acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:29:19 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:49:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:55:01 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 "possum" <ze  2008-04-25 02:36:54 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:48:39 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:31 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:48:54 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:53:18 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:25:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:45:41 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:48:33 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 "Used To Be Your Bel  2008-04-27 22:45:55 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 01:54:01 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:33:48 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-27 22:49:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:42:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:43:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:10:41 
Re: simply not acceptable
 cnniscrap@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-23 23:03:27 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:38:12 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:26:07 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:35:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:17:49 
Re: simply not acceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 15:24:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:30:16 
Re: simply not acceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:33:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:35:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:01:52 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:38:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:45:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:47:50 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:47:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:48:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-25 11:15:08 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 11:38:39 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 16:02:38 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 07:07:51 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:38:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
 Peter Terpstra <peter@  2008-04-21 23:21:53 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:05:31 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:59:50 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:00:20 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:09:52 
Unacceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:51:50 
Re: Unacceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:18:37 
Re: Unacceptable
 "." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-27 10:25:11 
Re: Unacceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 12:36:31 
Re: Unacceptable
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 09:09:22 
Re: Unacceptable
 "OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-28 00:18:06 
Re: Unacceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-28 15:41:26 
Re: Unacceptable
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-28 15:44:12 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 15:59:33 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:39:27 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-21 08:21:21