Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Just let pe...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 754 Topic 44698 of 54005
Post > Topic >>

Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.

by Raymond <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 21, 2008 at 09:02 PM

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:16:02 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:03:59 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:50:39 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:27:35 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:04:57 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:05:10 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:53:13 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:36:32 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:26:22 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:19:35 -0700, xi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you a Buddhist?
>>>>>>>>>> You sound like a communist crony.
>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------- It must be his Beijinger
>>>>>>>>>> accent.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If you at least believe in democracy, you should let the
>>>>>>>>>>> Tibetan people decide for themselves and tell the invaders to
>>>>>>>>>>> get out.
>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, they already did in 1951 and 1959, Americans and its CIA
is
>>>>>>>>>> not longer over there. Also the aristocrats left and the monks
>>>>>>>>>> cannot enslave peopl, cannot torture them and finally let them
>>>>>>>>>> die "at the will of god" when they are sick or too old.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>How about a national referendum?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sure, if you agree to fund it. 10 billion euros for 20 years, in
>>>>>>>> the twenty first year, we will have a referendum in Tibet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Too cheap to pay for it yourself?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We never have the need for such thing. Tibetan people are happy
>>>>>> living with their Han liberators. They have no desire to turn
>>>>>> themselves into slaves again under Da-Lie's brutal rule.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>Is that what you think of your people's political freedom? Or are
>>>>>>>you afraid of something?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is nothing to be afraid of. It is your request which we are
>>>>>> happy to oblige. Western style democracy is always based on money.
>>>>>> If you want it, you have to pay for it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>In that case, let's have a national referendum for free on the
>>>>>Internet. Were you able to give your beloved Tibetan people free
>>>>>access to the Internet?
>>>> 
>>>> That's not up to me. It is up to you. All you have to do is to send
us
>>>> the money, we are always happy to see the modernization of Tibet.
It's
>>>> very im****tant Chinese national project.
>>>
>>>
>>>It won't take any money at all.
>>>Just let people vote on the Internet. You just figure out how to make
it
>>>the secrete vote. Contact Google.
>> 
>> Hehehe... I'm sure you don't want to do that. Chinese internet users
>> will bury you alive.
>
>
>That's exactly what I'm hoping for, dear.
>Once you let them taste the freedom of speech,
>you will never be able to rein them in.

You are a ****ing liar. All Chinese demonstrations against western
biased re****ts about the situation in Tibet have been completely shut
out from mainstream media. The internet is no exception. The western
media tries everything they can to ignore and distort the voice of
Chinese people.

>
>Of course, at first they will say
>good things about the government.
>But as soon as they realize there is no way
>to track so many of them talking so much,
>they will feel free to talk whatever is on their mind.
>Isn't that why you are limiting access now, dear?

Which planet did you come from?
 




 754 Posts in Topic:
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 13:21:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-21 13:23:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 05:51:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:19:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-21 08:15:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
sb5309@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-20 23:46:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:20:55 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 07:58:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 07:27:23 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 20:05:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:48:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:51:25 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:46:41 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 21:31:39 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:43:52 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 01:58:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:52:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 04:29:42 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:56:30 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 04:52:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:34:07 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:45:50 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:16:02 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:02:47 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:59:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:27:33 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:57:09 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:24:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:31:56 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 20:29:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 23:34:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 18:36:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:46:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 20:55:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 16:39:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 17:02:02 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 08:22:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 18:10:10 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:36:27 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:16:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:54:34 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:41:58 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:17:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD  2008-04-21 22:00:28 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:36:37 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:20:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:07:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:43:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:13:46 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 23:09:37 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:26:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:20:44 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 21:34:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 05:08:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-30 16:45:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-25 18:53:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:56:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 00:07:29 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 19:19:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:55:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 16:39:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:55:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:05:00 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-30 01:40:24 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-30 09:17:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:09:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:50:11 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:12:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:10:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:52:14 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:15:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:25:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:22:31 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-23 13:56:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 18:01:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 22:34:22 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 02:21:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:32:41 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:46:10 
Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:50:39 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:03:59 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:41:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:52:20 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:31:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:09:12 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:21:56 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:39:21 
Re: Just let people votey on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:47:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:30:10 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:45:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:53:37 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:07:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:07:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:56:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-24 22:06:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:26:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 08:38:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:59:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:45:38 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:00:50 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:52:00 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:46:18 
Re: simply not acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-23 20:35:25 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:22:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:52:20 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:41:56 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 10:09:15 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:56:26 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:04:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:05:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:12:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 11:13:34 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:27:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:23:30 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:26:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
Duke Lama <dukelama@[E  2008-04-24 22:35:10 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:18:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:36:44 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:22:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:24:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:49:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:39:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:23:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:43:11 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:47:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 09:53:23 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:34:42 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 11:37:36 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:14:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:10:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:01:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:17:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:21:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:26:33 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 06:24:24 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 10:07:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:44:08 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:12:17 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-27 19:10:12 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 01:20:28 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-28 19:27:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:32:57 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-28 19:43:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:43:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 10:57:50 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 06:44:50 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:00:05 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:14:52 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:29:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:04:57 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:27:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:55:29 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:25:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:38:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:58:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:35:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:16:28 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:23:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:39:59 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:07:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-25 10:53:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:39:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:33:33 
The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 23:31:08 
Re: The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-28 22:53:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:00:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:56:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:08:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 12:53:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 20:01:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 21:06:25 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 19:50:14 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 08:23:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:08:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 02:04:36 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 16:23:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 00:03:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 01:43:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 09:13:39 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 13:57:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 14:00:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 13:47:09 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 21:40:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 19:50:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:41:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-24 19:17:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:53:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 21:26:50 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:58:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 22:46:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:21:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:26:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:23:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:35:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:32:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:38:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum or snakes in my house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 11:20:31 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:15:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:41:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 13:07:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-27 21:19:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 20:07:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:42:57 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 08:51:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 09:09:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 03:28:21 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 10:36:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:01:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 15:45:50 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 19:01:43 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 23:48:33 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:46:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 02:50:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:49:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:55:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-26 21:42:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 20:15:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:15:12 
The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:42:18 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:02:28 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:39:57 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:17:34 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:08:50 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:39:24 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:21:23 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:24:43 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 16:39:41 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:13:20 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:34:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-24 20:41:04 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:21:39 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:59:02 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:32:14 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:54:05 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:13:00 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:29:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:25:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-22 21:43:33 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:37:02 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:52:55 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:20:26 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:48:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:13:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:34 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:44 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:07:31 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:10:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:20:21 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:32:29 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:36:29 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:53:13 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:05:10 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:58:46 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 11:16:15 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:21:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:44:03 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:52:26 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:51:57 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:46:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:23:23 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 17:15:32 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 14:34:18 
let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:47:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:18:30 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:13:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:07:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:51:09 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:20:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:16:58 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:11:33 
How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:45:21 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:11:54 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:52:06 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:18:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:19:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:57:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:38 
Re: so silly
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:38:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-22 19:46:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:43:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:05:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 23:54:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:29:52 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:46:17 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:53:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:24:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:42:45 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:15:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:29:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:27:11 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:02:55 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:15:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:33:48 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:10 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:42:36 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:44 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:12:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:22:35 
Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are create
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-21 02:37:10 
The principle of "All men are created equal".
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 19:59:05 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
"RussellT" <  2008-04-21 13:33:14 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:12:16 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:42:34 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:57:13 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:58:05 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:28:03 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 23:54:34 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:39:28 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:45:20 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 00:06:20 
Re: so silly
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:26:39 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 14:20:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:02:39 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:37:40 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:21:36 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 20:17:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:28:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:57:29 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:29:19 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:49:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:55:01 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"possum" <ze  2008-04-25 02:36:54 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:48:39 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:31 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:48:54 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:53:18 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:25:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:45:41 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:48:33 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"Used To Be Your Bel  2008-04-27 22:45:55 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 01:54:01 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:33:48 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-27 22:49:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:42:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:43:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:10:41 
Re: simply not acceptable
cnniscrap@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-23 23:03:27 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:38:12 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:26:07 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:35:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:17:49 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 15:24:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:30:16 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:33:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:35:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:01:52 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:38:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:45:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:47:50 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:47:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:48:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-25 11:15:08 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 11:38:39 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 16:02:38 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 07:07:51 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:38:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Peter Terpstra <peter@  2008-04-21 23:21:53 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:05:31 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:59:50