Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: let them ha...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 50 of 754 Topic 44698 of 54005
Post > Topic >>

Re: let them have a national referendum

by oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 01:13 PM

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:16:28 -0400, Raymond wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:35:35 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:07:01 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:13:49 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:32 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:37:56 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:10:48 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:20:02 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:48:10 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:31:56 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:43:26 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:07:05 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:58:16 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:38:08 -0500, oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:18:30 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:47:54 -0500, oxtail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:28:35 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:54:44 -0500, oxtail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <oxtail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:45:23 -0400, Raymond wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:07:52 -0700 (PDT), xi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <xieu.ling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I would add murder, burning buildings and cars,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>commiting agressions to athletes, terrorifing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>innocents, etc. is that Tibetan buddism?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. There are just too many of those evil traits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idol wor****ping a godking should also be one of those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evil traits. It's definitely something for the western
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buddhists to think about. They should be shocked to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find out they have been sup****ting the worst enemy of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gautama Buddha.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is that why you are exploiting them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exploiting whom? The former slave owners? What do they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have that I need? The lustful carnal desire or the evil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unforgivable karma for ruling over the Tibetan people?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a picture of Tibetan slave with his master. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you recognize who is who?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Let's ask the Tibetan people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you want to ask?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't you just move out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and let them have a national referendum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is no chance in hell the former slave owner
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is going to rule Tibet again with or without referendum.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Don't underestimate your own influence. No Tibetan people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>would voluntarily become slaves anymore. That's why they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>want you to get out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To do what? To invite the former slave owner back in? That's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> absurd logic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What's going on?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not a single Tibetan person is allowed to speak freely on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the Usenet?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. The governor of Tibet has spoken repeatedly to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> world to explain the situation in Tibet. Where have you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> been? Getting butt ****ed by His Horniness the Devil Lama?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Can you say "I would love to butt **** the president of China"
>>>>>>>>>>>>for us here?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Try it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>You don't have to mean it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Still, it will be exhilarating.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I would love to butt **** His Horniness the Devil Lama with my
>>>>>>>>>>> big ****ing leather boot.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Now say: "Hallelujah!".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I'm beginning to think you are stupid. You don't know the power
>>>>>>>>>>of free speech.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> How can that be? I'm enjoying it right this moment.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>If I start to say ****ographic things about Chinese leaders, you
>>>>>>>>>>are more than likely to be reprimanded for having caused such
>>>>>>>>>>distasteful posts on record. Just pray that your name does not
>>>>>>>>>>show up with them on Google.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>As for me, nobody even cares.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> How disappointing. You don't care? Why? Having nothing better to
>>>>>>>>> say anymore?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As I don't say rude things so easily, I'm forced to look for some
>>>>>>>>juicy ones on the Internet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, I changed my mind.
>>>>>>>>Too busy for now and way beneath me.
>>>>>>>>But, don't stay here too long.
>>>>>>>>I might change my mind again.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please go **** yourself and get hell out of Chinese groups, you
>>>>>>> stupid western ****. What do you know about China for you to come
>>>>>>> to our groups to spread your ****ing bull****, you arrogant ass?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I like classical Chinese poetry and
>>>>>>am keenly interested in Daoism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Have you ever read Zhuangzi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhuangzi
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why bother? Why not go have *** with Da-Lie instead?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Is that what you do
>>>>when you are not talking literature?
>>>>
>>>>What else do you do here?
>>>>Solicit prostitution?
>>> 
>>> Since when has the west stopped going to bed with Da-Lie? Isn't that
>>> what you people have been fond of doing for so many years?  Why being
>>> so disingenuous about your own activities?
>>
>>
>>What's up with you and that guy?
>>Have you been jilted by him?
> 
> What's up with you? Why being a stupid jerk?


I'm glad to see that you are
familiar with that concept.
You really should stop being one.

-- 
oxtail
 




 754 Posts in Topic:
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 13:21:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-21 13:23:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 05:51:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:19:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-21 08:15:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
sb5309@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-20 23:46:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:20:55 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 07:58:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 07:27:23 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 20:05:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:48:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:51:25 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:46:41 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 21:31:39 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:43:52 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 01:58:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:52:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 04:29:42 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:56:30 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 04:52:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:34:07 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:45:50 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:16:02 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:02:47 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:59:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:27:33 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:57:09 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:24:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:31:56 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 20:29:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 23:34:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 18:36:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:46:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 20:55:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 16:39:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 17:02:02 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 08:22:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 18:10:10 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:36:27 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:16:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:54:34 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:41:58 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:17:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD  2008-04-21 22:00:28 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:36:37 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:20:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:07:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:43:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:13:46 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 23:09:37 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:26:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:20:44 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 21:34:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 05:08:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-30 16:45:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-25 18:53:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:56:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 00:07:29 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 19:19:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:55:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 16:39:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:55:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:05:00 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-30 01:40:24 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-30 09:17:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:09:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:50:11 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:12:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:10:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:52:14 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:15:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:25:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:22:31 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-23 13:56:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 18:01:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 22:34:22 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 02:21:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:32:41 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:46:10 
Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:50:39 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:03:59 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:41:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:52:20 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:31:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:09:12 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:21:56 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:39:21 
Re: Just let people votey on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:47:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:30:10 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:45:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:53:37 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:07:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:07:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:56:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-24 22:06:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:26:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 08:38:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:59:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:45:38 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:00:50 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:52:00 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:46:18 
Re: simply not acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-23 20:35:25 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:22:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:52:20 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:41:56 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 10:09:15 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:56:26 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:04:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:05:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:12:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 11:13:34 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:27:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:23:30 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:26:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
Duke Lama <dukelama@[E  2008-04-24 22:35:10 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:18:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:36:44 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:22:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:24:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:49:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:39:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:23:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:43:11 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:47:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 09:53:23 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:34:42 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 11:37:36 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:14:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:10:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:01:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:17:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:21:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:26:33 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 06:24:24 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 10:07:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:44:08 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:12:17 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-27 19:10:12 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 01:20:28 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-28 19:27:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:32:57 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-28 19:43:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:43:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 10:57:50 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 06:44:50 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:00:05 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:14:52 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:29:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:04:57 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:27:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:55:29 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:25:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:38:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:58:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:35:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:16:28 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:23:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:39:59 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:07:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-25 10:53:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:39:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:33:33 
The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 23:31:08 
Re: The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-28 22:53:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:00:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:56:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:08:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 12:53:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 20:01:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 21:06:25 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 19:50:14 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 08:23:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:08:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 02:04:36 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 16:23:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 00:03:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 01:43:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 09:13:39 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 13:57:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 14:00:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 13:47:09 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 21:40:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 19:50:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:41:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-24 19:17:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:53:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 21:26:50 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:58:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 22:46:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:21:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:26:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:23:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:35:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:32:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:38:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum or snakes in my house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 11:20:31 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:15:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:41:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 13:07:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-27 21:19:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 20:07:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:42:57 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 08:51:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 09:09:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 03:28:21 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 10:36:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:01:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 15:45:50 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 19:01:43 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 23:48:33 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:46:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 02:50:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:49:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:55:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-26 21:42:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 20:15:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:15:12 
The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:42:18 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:02:28 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:39:57 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:17:34 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:08:50 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:39:24 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:21:23 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:24:43 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 16:39:41 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:13:20 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:34:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-24 20:41:04 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:21:39 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:59:02 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:32:14 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:54:05 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:13:00 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:29:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:25:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-22 21:43:33 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:37:02 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:52:55 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:20:26 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:48:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:13:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:34 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:44 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:07:31 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:10:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:20:21 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:32:29 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:36:29 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:53:13 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:05:10 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:58:46 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 11:16:15 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:21:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:44:03 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:52:26 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:51:57 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:46:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:23:23 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 17:15:32 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 14:34:18 
let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:47:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:18:30 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:13:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:07:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:51:09 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:20:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:16:58 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:11:33 
How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:45:21 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:11:54 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:52:06 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:18:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:19:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:57:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:38 
Re: so silly
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:38:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-22 19:46:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:43:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:05:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 23:54:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:29:52 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:46:17 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:53:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:24:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:42:45 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:15:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:29:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:27:11 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:02:55 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:15:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:33:48 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:10 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:42:36 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:44 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:12:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:22:35 
Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are create
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-21 02:37:10 
The principle of "All men are created equal".
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 19:59:05 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
"RussellT" <  2008-04-21 13:33:14 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:12:16 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:42:34 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:57:13 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:58:05 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:28:03 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 23:54:34 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:39:28 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:45:20 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 00:06:20 
Re: so silly
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:26:39 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 14:20:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:02:39 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:37:40 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:21:36 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 20:17:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:28:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:57:29 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:29:19 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:49:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:55:01 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"possum" <ze  2008-04-25 02:36:54 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:48:39 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:31 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:48:54 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:53:18 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:25:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:45:41 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:48:33 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"Used To Be Your Bel  2008-04-27 22:45:55 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 01:54:01 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:33:48 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-27 22:49:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:42:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:43:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:10:41 
Re: simply not acceptable
cnniscrap@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-23 23:03:27 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:38:12