Re: Tibet closed to western media is just a way to say "No comment"

On Apr 17, 12:31=A0am, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:16:42 +0800, Jim Walsh
>
> <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:41:55 +0800, Raymond wrote
> >(in article <1ehc04ho5kocbs7ako69p3m2iltiqiq...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> >> I suppose the reason Cafferty specifically talked about the last 50
> >> years instead of the last 5000 years is simply because the New
> >> people's republic was the only country in the world that has beaten
> >> the Americans in battle.
>
> >1. The US =A0 has lost lots of wars. The first defeat occurred in 1812,
w=
hen the
> >British defeated America.
>
> It's about the modern warfare. The shadow of Korean war will forever
> haunt American generals and the Wa****ngton bosses.
>
>

> >2. Cafferty was talking about the leaders of the CCP (about 50 years)
not=
 the
> >Chinese people (5,000 years. And he only told the truth. Thugs and
goons.=


> He was talking about the Chinese people. Stop lying you stupid ass.

But Ray, he said "for the last 50 years" which clearly is a reference
to the Chinese government, not the Chinese people. How could you miss
that, Ray?

>
> >3. The current border between N. and S. Korea is where it was when the
No=
rth
> >invaded the South. A war that didn't change anything would have to be
cal=
led
> >a tie.
>
> Chinese army pushed the Americans from Yalu river all the way back to
> the 38th parallel. I would not call that a tie.

How much territory changed hands from the start to the end of the war,
Ray? That's the right way to measure that. How could you argue
otherwise, Ray?