On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:46:56 -0700, jimzorn wrote:
>> Belief is not a basis for proof or for truth. You need more than one
>> or two uncorroborated anecdotes, which could be lies, to establish that
>> something is taking place. Otherwise you are a propogandist and
>> nothing more.
>>
> I gave you four references: Kawaguchi, the Nazi expedition to Tibet,
> Michael Parenti, and the book by a Tibetan who was abused as a boy in
> Tibet. Although I can't post the entirety of this content here, it is
> readily available through an online search.
>
> The reason these kind of things went on in the Catholic church for so
> long is because nobody wanted to admit or believe such things could
> happen. This is usually the case in ***ual abuse.
>
> I'm not a propagandist, I'm a person just like you who is here to
> discuss these things. I used to believe in Tibetan independence, but now
> believe that it would only hurt the Tibetans.
I don't care much about nationalism.
But I care deeply about the freedom of speech.
No one should be killed or jailed
for participating in a peaceful demonstration.
What the Chinese are doing in Tibet is
simply not acceptable.
--
oxtail
|
