Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: let them ha...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 51 of 754 Topic 44698 of 54005
Post > Topic >>

Re: let them have a national referendum

by Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 24, 2008 at 11:09 PM

On Apr 25, 12:58=A0am, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Awaken21 wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 11:53 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>small tortoiseshell wrote:
>
> >>>On Apr 24, 2:40 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>>>Once again, you make a ridiculous connection between the rampant
> >>>>unconstitutional actions of the GW Bush administraition and the
voices=

> >>>>of Americans, who are overwhelmingly against his actions.
>
> >>>hmmm. selected twice, but, the voices of americans are overwhelmingly
> >>>against his actions.. something that doesnt add up here...
>
> >>well, that is, if you believe he was a/selected, and b/that Americans
> >>desires, rather than their fears, were reflected in the vote.
>
> >>Clearly, the first time he was elected, the Supreme Court and the
state
> >>of Florida manipulated the result.
>
> > Actually, just for the record, the state of Florida was in the middle
> > of trying to sort things out and return the result when it was
> > snatched out their hands by the Supreme Court. When Florida finally
> > announced the offical result and the winner, Al Gore, a number of
> > weeks later, it was too late, the Supreme Court had already pulled
> > their unprecedented, poorly considered, and unconstitional manuever.
>
> That may be basically true, but the Republican Sectretary of State of
> Florida - Katherine Harris - certified the vote count over many
> objections, and fought effectively against the recount effort:

Her ruling was quickly overturned by the Florida Supreme Court as
stated below. Had it been left in Florida's hands, Al Gore's would
have been the President, he won the state, we counted the vote and in
the end delivered the correct results. I find it hard to believe that
waiting the week or two it took for due process to occur in Florida
would have destablized the entire nation.

The US Supreme Court unconstitionally took control of the situation
and delivered the Presidency to GB in a quick and  poorly deliberated
decision.

>
> =A0From Wikipedia:
> "As Secretary of State for the State of Florida, Harris presided over
> the contested 2000 US presidential election in Florida. There were
> allegations of conflicts of interest and partisan, unethical behavior by
> Katherine Harris during the 2000 campaign. Harris had been named as
> Bush's Florida campaign co-chair the year before.
>
> Harris certified that the Republican candidate, then-Texas Governor
> George W. Bush, had defeated the Democratic candidate, then-Vice
> President Al Gore, in the popular vote of Florida and thus certified the
> Republican slate of electors. Her ruling was challenged and overturned
> on appeal by Florida's Supreme Court; this decision, however, was itself
> reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore. That Court ruled
> (5-4) that Gore's request to extend Florida's statutory deadline for
> ballot re-counts had no merit, because no Florida law at the time
> provided for that option. This ruling nullified the state court's
> decision, upholding Harris' certification..."
>
> Robert
>
> - - - - - - -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 




 754 Posts in Topic:
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 13:21:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-21 13:23:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 05:51:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:19:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-21 08:15:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
sb5309@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-20 23:46:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:20:55 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 07:58:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 07:27:23 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 20:05:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:48:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:51:25 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:46:41 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 21:31:39 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:43:52 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 01:58:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:52:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 04:29:42 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:56:30 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 04:52:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:34:07 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:45:50 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:16:02 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:02:47 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:59:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:27:33 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:57:09 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:24:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:31:56 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 20:29:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 23:34:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 18:36:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:46:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 20:55:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 16:39:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 17:02:02 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 08:22:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 18:10:10 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:36:27 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:16:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:54:34 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:41:58 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:17:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD  2008-04-21 22:00:28 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:36:37 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:20:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:07:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:43:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:13:46 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 23:09:37 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:26:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:20:44 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 21:34:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 05:08:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-30 16:45:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-25 18:53:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:56:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 00:07:29 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 19:19:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:55:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 16:39:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:55:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:05:00 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-30 01:40:24 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-30 09:17:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:09:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:50:11 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:12:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:10:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:52:14 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:15:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:25:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:22:31 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-23 13:56:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 18:01:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 22:34:22 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 02:21:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:32:41 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:46:10 
Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:50:39 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:03:59 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:41:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:52:20 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:31:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:09:12 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:21:56 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:39:21 
Re: Just let people votey on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:47:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:30:10 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:45:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:53:37 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:07:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:07:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:56:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-24 22:06:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:26:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 08:38:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:59:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:45:38 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:00:50 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:52:00 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:46:18 
Re: simply not acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-23 20:35:25 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:22:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:52:20 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:41:56 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 10:09:15 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:56:26 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:04:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:05:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:12:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 11:13:34 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:27:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:23:30 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:26:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
Duke Lama <dukelama@[E  2008-04-24 22:35:10 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:18:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:36:44 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:22:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:24:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:49:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:39:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:23:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:43:11 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:47:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 09:53:23 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:34:42 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 11:37:36 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:14:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:10:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:01:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:17:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:21:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:26:33 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 06:24:24 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 10:07:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:44:08 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:12:17 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-27 19:10:12 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 01:20:28 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-28 19:27:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:32:57 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-28 19:43:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:43:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 10:57:50 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 06:44:50 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:00:05 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:14:52 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:29:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:04:57 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:27:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:55:29 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:25:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:38:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:58:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:35:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:16:28 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:23:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:39:59 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:07:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-25 10:53:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:39:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:33:33 
The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 23:31:08 
Re: The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-28 22:53:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:00:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:56:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:08:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 12:53:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 20:01:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 21:06:25 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 19:50:14 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 08:23:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:08:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 02:04:36 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 16:23:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 00:03:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 01:43:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 09:13:39 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 13:57:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 14:00:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 13:47:09 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 21:40:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 19:50:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:41:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-24 19:17:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:53:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 21:26:50 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:58:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 22:46:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:21:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:26:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:23:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:35:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:32:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:38:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum or snakes in my house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 11:20:31 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:15:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:41:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 13:07:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-27 21:19:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 20:07:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:42:57 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 08:51:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 09:09:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 03:28:21 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 10:36:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:01:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 15:45:50 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 19:01:43 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 23:48:33 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:46:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 02:50:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:49:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:55:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-26 21:42:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 20:15:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:15:12 
The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:42:18 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:02:28 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:39:57 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:17:34 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:08:50 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:39:24 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:21:23 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:24:43 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 16:39:41 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:13:20 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:34:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-24 20:41:04 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:21:39 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:59:02 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:32:14 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:54:05 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:13:00 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:29:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:25:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-22 21:43:33 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:37:02 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:52:55 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:20:26 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:48:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:13:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:34 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:44 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:07:31 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:10:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:20:21 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:32:29 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:36:29 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:53:13 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:05:10 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:58:46 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 11:16:15 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:21:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:44:03 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:52:26 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:51:57 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:46:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:23:23 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 17:15:32 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 14:34:18 
let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:47:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:18:30 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:13:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:07:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:51:09 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:20:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:16:58 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:11:33 
How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:45:21 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:11:54 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:52:06 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:18:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:19:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:57:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:38 
Re: so silly
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:38:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-22 19:46:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:43:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:05:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 23:54:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:29:52 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:46:17 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:53:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:24:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:42:45 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:15:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:29:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:27:11 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:02:55 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:15:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:33:48 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:10 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:42:36 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:44 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:12:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:22:35 
Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are create
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-21 02:37:10 
The principle of "All men are created equal".
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 19:59:05 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
"RussellT" <  2008-04-21 13:33:14 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:12:16 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:42:34 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:57:13 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:58:05 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:28:03 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 23:54:34 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:39:28 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:45:20 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 00:06:20 
Re: so silly
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:26:39 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 14:20:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:02:39 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:37:40 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:21:36 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 20:17:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:28:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:57:29 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:29:19 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:49:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:55:01 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"possum" <ze  2008-04-25 02:36:54 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:48:39 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:31 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:48:54 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:53:18 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:25:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:45:41 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:48:33 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"Used To Be Your Bel  2008-04-27 22:45:55 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 01:54:01 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:33:48 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-27 22:49:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:42:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:43:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:10:41 
Re: simply not acceptable
cnniscrap@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-23 23:03:27 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:38:12 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:26:07 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:35:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:17:49 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 15:24:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:30:16 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:33:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:35:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:01:52 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:38:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:45:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:47:50 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:47:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:48:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-25 11:15:08 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 11:38:39 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 16:02:38 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 07:07:51 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:38:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Peter Terpstra <peter@  2008-04-21 23:21:53 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:05:31 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:59:50 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:00:20 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:09:52 
Unacceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:51:50 
Re: Unacceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:18:37 
Re: Unacceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-27 10:25:11