Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: let them ha...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 34 of 754 Topic 44698 of 53285
Post > Topic >>

Re: let them have a national referendum

by Robert Epstein <vze256xu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 26, 2008 at 12:46 PM

small tortoiseshell wrote:

> On Apr 25, 11:20 am, bluej <fjin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>On Apr 25, 10:36 am, small tortoiseshell <_cl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Apr 25, 8:51 am, bluej <fjin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>On Apr 25, 1:32 am, small tortoiseshell <_cl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Apr 25, 12:46 pm, bluej <fjin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>On Apr 24, 12:07 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>bluej wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Here are some historical facts you may want to consider before
lending
>>>>>>>>a no-brainer sup****t to the 'free tibet' propaganda. Tibet was
>>>>>>>>integrated into China in the 11th century.
>>
>>>>>>>Integrated!  Ha ha, that's a good one.  How exactly did that come
about?
>>>>>>>  WIth the consent of Tibetans?  [nope.]
>>
>>>>>>>   It only truely governed
>>
>>>>>>>>itself between 1913 and 1951 due to British invasion and China's
civil
>>>>>>>>war. Most Tibetans were slaves
>>
>>>>>>>proof, please
>>
>>>>>>>   and Tibet was not a good place to be
>>
>>>>>>>>during this period.
>>
>>>>>>>Whereas it was great to be in China during their Civil War.
>>
>>>>>>>   When China reasserted itself in 1951,
>>
>>>>>>>Reasserted?  Ha ha, how did it do that?  By crusing the Tibetans
and
>>>>>>>enslaving them itself.  Good one!
>>
>>>>>>>   it abolished
>>
>>>>>>>>slavery and gave Tibet special autonomy.
>>
>>>>>>>Well, being under the forced rule of a foreign power is not an end
to
>>>>>>>slavery in my opinion, but if you like it, fine for you personally.
>>>>>>>Don't impose it on others.
>>
>>>>>>>   Life expectancy and
>>
>>>>>>>>population soared in Tibet afterwards. A Tibetan family can have 3
>>>>>>>>children despite the 1-child policy. Mountain was scaled--a
>>>>>>>>engineering feat--to build railroad for Tibet's economic growth.
>>
>>>>>>>ie, some of the mountains were destroyed so that the Chinese army
could
>>>>>>>get in and out without opposition.
>>
>>>>>>>>Tibetans also enjoy more financial sup****t from the government
than
>>>>>>>>any other minority.
>>
>>>>>>>Except there are now more Chinese that have taken over the land and
many
>>>>>>>of the Tibetans have been jailed or chased out.  Good job!
>>
>>>>>>>   Study the history and you will find that life for
>>
>>>>>>>>an average Tibetan got better when Dailai Lama went to exile.
>>
>>>>>>>Depends on how you define "better."  Being forced to take on a
foreign
>>>>>>>culture, having your own destroyed, your leaders jailed, killed or
>>>>>>>exiled.  Sounds good to me!
>>
>>>>>>>   The
>>
>>>>>>>>Tibetan exile community--rich monks and nobles--will always use
>>>>>>>>religion as an instrument to their separatist movement and play
>>>>>>>>victims of oppression. Why couldn't they since they receive
millions
>>>>>>>>in funding from CIA according to the do***ent released by the
state
>>>>>>>>department. Carving-up countries like china is in the interests of
>>>>>>>>U.S. imperialism. That's why they befriend Dailai Lama and paints
him
>>>>>>>>as a humanitarian, despite the fact that Dailai's self-serving
agenda
>>>>>>>>will take Tibet back to the middle age. And the fraud of his
>>>>>>>>humanitarianism! He never condemned the militant separatists who
>>>>>>>>barbarously burned Han- and Tibetan- Chinese alive during the
recent
>>>>>>>>riot.
>>
>>>>>>>Please provide some evidence that anyone was burned alive during
the
>>>>>>>recent protests.  You must at least have pictures of some charred
bodies
>>>>>>>to show.  Right?
>>
>>>>>>>   Instead his attitude towards the riot borders on acquiescence.
>>
>>>>>>>Acquiescence?  You mean he accepts the fact that Tibetans want to
throw
>>>>>>>off their Chinese masters?  For shame!
>>
>>>>>>>>The is man is a political op****tunist no matter what good PR he
gets
>>>>>>>>from the western media.
>>
>>>>>>>And you are a brainwashed minion.
>>
>>>>>>>You know the sad thing is that the Chinese people are indeed a most
>>>>>>>wonderful people; and ones from whom I have personally gotten so
much
>>>>>>>cultural and spiritual benefit.  In my own spiritual development I
have
>>>>>>>benefited from Taoist arts like T'ai Chi and have had at least one
>>>>>>>wonderful Chinese teacher; Ch'an Buddhism, also from China; and
even in
>>>>>>>the area of food and tea I am practically part-Chinese.  It is a
shame
>>>>>>>that the country of China, which has so much good in it and so much
to
>>>>>>>share, has to practice aggression against its neighbors and deny it
with
>>>>>>>propoganda, as well as practice its own internal oppressive
political
>>>>>>>controls.  It does not really fit the independent Chinese
character.  I
>>>>>>>hope some day the Chinese people will be free to develop themselves
as
>>>>>>>they choose, without living under an authoritarian structure and
>>>>>>>imposing it on others.  This is how I really feel.
>>
>>>>>>>Best,
>>>>>>>Robert
>>
>>>>>>>===================================
>>
>>>>>>You requested pictures of burned victims during the riot. Here are
the
>>>>>>5 girls burned to death by Tibetan rioters. I can provide more but
>>>>>>don't know if you genuinely want to see them or just want to
challenge
>>>>>>me with providing proof.
>>
>>>>>he will only reply that the photos are made up by the chinese
>>>>>propaganda machine and toss some insults at you instead,
>>>>>so save your self the trouble and let it go...
>>
>>>>>>http://www.chinasmile.net/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21251&d=...
>>
>>>>>>They were working at a boutique supposed owned by Han-Chinese.
However
>>>>>>one of the victims was actually Tibetan. One survior, another
Tibetan
>>>>>>girl, told re****ters that they were cornered by a bunch of Tibetans
>>>>>>pretending to be shoppers. When they started burning the shop, she
>>>>>>made a run for her life at the risk of being knifed to death by the
>>>>>>rioters. She survived, the other 5 didn't. Also a family-run
autoshop,
>>>>>>two parents, their 8-month old son, and two employees, all Han-
>>>>>>Chinese, were killed in hiding from rioters when they started a
>>>>>>petroleum gas fire in the shop. And many more arsons like this. So
far
>>>>>>5 Tibetans were arrested relating to these arsons, 3 female, 2 male.
I
>>>>>>don't know how to translate their names though.
>>
>>>>>>Please stop being lazy and watch the actual riot footage 'VIDEO :
>>>>>>2008 Tibet (Lhasa) Riot, the Truth and Lies- Part 1-4'
athttp://www.anti-cnn.com/
>>
>>>>>>where rioters terrorized both Han and Tibetan residents. Note in
part
>>>>>>3 where Nepalnese police beating monks were re****ted as Chinese
>>>>>>police. Also CNN cropped original pictures and interpreted it as
>>>>>>people running away from police truck, but in fact, the original
>>>>>>picture shows rioters throwing rocks at the truck. Sorry about the
>>>>>>language barrier in some information provided. I trust you to
>>>>>>formulate your own conclusions with information not made available
to
>>>>>>you by your mainstream media.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>>>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>>- Show quoted text -
>>
>>>>I wanted to give him the respect of backing up my views with empirical
>>>>evidence. You are probably right though. Some people will love you for
>>>>telling the 'truth' they want, and will hate you for telling them
>>>>something different. I used to believe that facts speak for
>>>>themselves, but apparently not, given the systematic media bias by way
>>>>of misrepresentations and distortions.
>>
>>>this link gives some info. it seems. maybe you posted it already, but
>>>if not
>>>it might be of help to some...
>>
>>>http://www.swans.com/library/art9/mparen01.html
>>
>>>- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>- Show quoted text -
>>
>>Hope they are interested in reading sober and balanced research and
>>analyses. Thanks for the link. :)
> 
> 
> 
> most welcome. I am one of ' they'  as well of course. Just for mention
> I am probably less informed then Robert about politics in general and
> us/china policy in particular,but sometimes digging up a little
> information helps in getting the perspectives a little more balanced.
> I didnt know until yesterday what i found out about u.s. involvement
> in cambodia pr.ex, during the vietnam war. i knew about Laos but not
> cambodia, and not the extent of it either, and that came up because
> tang mentioned Khieu Sampan and then i started googling... So thanks
> both of you actually. without roberts anti communist fits

I'm not anti-communist.  I'm anti-torture, anti-forced labor, 
anti-imprisonment without trial, anti-invason and takeover of other 
countries, whether they are Tibet or Iraq.  I don't care if the country 
is communist or capitalist, I am against those practices, as I assume 
you are too.  So stop your own fit of anti-Robert-ism and try to be 
truthful instead of poisonous.

   and your
> information i wouldnt have looked for this andwouldt have found SWANS
> as well. lots of good stuff in there.
> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - Hide quoted text -
> 
>>- Show quoted text -
> 
> 
>
 




 754 Posts in Topic:
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 13:21:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-21 13:23:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 05:51:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:19:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-21 08:15:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
sb5309@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-20 23:46:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:20:55 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 07:58:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 07:27:23 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 20:05:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:48:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:51:25 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:46:41 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 21:31:39 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:43:52 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 01:58:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:52:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 04:29:42 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:56:30 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 04:52:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:34:07 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:45:50 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:16:02 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:02:47 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:59:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:27:33 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:57:09 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:24:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:31:56 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 20:29:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 23:34:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 18:36:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:46:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 20:55:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 16:39:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 17:02:02 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 08:22:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 18:10:10 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:36:27 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:16:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:54:34 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:41:58 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:17:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD  2008-04-21 22:00:28 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:36:37 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:20:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:07:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:43:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:13:46 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 23:09:37 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:26:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:20:44 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 21:34:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 05:08:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-30 16:45:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-25 18:53:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:56:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 00:07:29 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 19:19:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:55:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 16:39:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:55:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:05:00 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-30 01:40:24 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-30 09:17:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:09:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:50:11 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:12:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:10:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:52:14 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:15:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:25:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:22:31 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-23 13:56:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 18:01:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 22:34:22 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 02:21:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:32:41 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:46:10 
Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:50:39 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:03:59 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:41:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:52:20 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:31:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:09:12 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:21:56 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:39:21 
Re: Just let people votey on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:47:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:30:10 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:45:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:53:37 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:07:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:07:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:56:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-24 22:06:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:26:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 08:38:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:59:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:45:38 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:00:50 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:52:00 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:46:18 
Re: simply not acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-23 20:35:25 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:22:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:52:20 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:41:56 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 10:09:15 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:56:26 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:04:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:05:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:12:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 11:13:34 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:27:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:23:30 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:26:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
Duke Lama <dukelama@[E  2008-04-24 22:35:10 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:18:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:36:44 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:22:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:24:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:49:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:39:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:23:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:43:11 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:47:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 09:53:23 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:34:42 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 11:37:36 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:14:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:10:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:01:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:17:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:21:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:26:33 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 06:24:24 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 10:07:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:44:08 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:12:17 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-27 19:10:12 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 01:20:28 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-28 19:27:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:32:57 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-28 19:43:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:43:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 10:57:50 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 06:44:50 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:00:05 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:14:52 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:29:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:04:57 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:27:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:55:29 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:25:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:38:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:58:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:35:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:16:28 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:23:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:39:59 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:07:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-25 10:53:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:39:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:33:33 
The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 23:31:08 
Re: The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-28 22:53:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:00:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:56:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:08:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 12:53:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 20:01:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 21:06:25 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 19:50:14 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 08:23:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:08:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 02:04:36 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 16:23:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 00:03:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 01:43:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 09:13:39 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 13:57:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 14:00:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 13:47:09 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 21:40:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 19:50:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:41:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-24 19:17:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:53:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 21:26:50 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:58:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 22:46:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:21:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:26:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:23:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:35:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:32:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:38:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum or snakes in my house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 11:20:31 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:15:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:41:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 13:07:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-27 21:19:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 20:07:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:42:57 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 08:51:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 09:09:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 03:28:21 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 10:36:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:01:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 15:45:50 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 19:01:43 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 23:48:33 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:46:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 02:50:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:49:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:55:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-26 21:42:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 20:15:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:15:12 
The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:42:18 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:02:28 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:39:57 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:17:34 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:08:50 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:39:24 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:21:23 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:24:43 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 16:39:41 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:13:20 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:34:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-24 20:41:04 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:21:39 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:59:02 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:32:14 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:54:05 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:13:00 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:29:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:25:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-22 21:43:33 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:37:02 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:52:55 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:20:26 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:48:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:13:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:34 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:44 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:07:31 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:10:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:20:21 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:32:29 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:36:29 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:53:13 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:05:10 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:58:46 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 11:16:15 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:21:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:44:03 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:52:26 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:51:57 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:46:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:23:23 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 17:15:32 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 14:34:18 
let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:47:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:18:30 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:13:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:07:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:51:09 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:20:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:16:58 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:11:33 
How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:45:21 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:11:54 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:52:06 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:18:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:19:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:57:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:38 
Re: so silly
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:38:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-22 19:46:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:43:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:05:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 23:54:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:29:52 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:46:17 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:53:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:24:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:42:45 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:15:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:29:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:27:11 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:02:55 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:15:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:33:48 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:10 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:42:36 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:44 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:12:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:22:35 
Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are create
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-21 02:37:10 
The principle of "All men are created equal".
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 19:59:05 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
"RussellT" <  2008-04-21 13:33:14 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:12:16 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:42:34 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:57:13 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:58:05 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:28:03 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 23:54:34 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:39:28 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:45:20 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 00:06:20 
Re: so silly
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:26:39 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 14:20:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:02:39 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:37:40 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:21:36 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 20:17:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:28:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:57:29 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:29:19 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:49:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:55:01 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"possum" <ze  2008-04-25 02:36:54 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:48:39 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:31 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:48:54 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:53:18 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:25:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:45:41 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:48:33 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"Used To Be Your Bel  2008-04-27 22:45:55 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 01:54:01 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:33:48 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-27 22:49:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:42:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:43:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:10:41