Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: let them ha...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 62 of 754 Topic 44698 of 53285
Post > Topic >>

Re: let them have a national referendum

by small tortoiseshell <_cloud@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 26, 2008 at 04:39 PM

On Apr 26, 10:45 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
> >>>>>===================================
>
> >>>>You requested pictures of burned victims during the riot. Here are
the
> >>>>5 girls burned to death by Tibetan rioters. I can provide more but
> >>>>don't know if you genuinely want to see them or just want to
challenge
> >>>>me with providing proof.
>
> >>>he will only reply that the photos are made up by the chinese
> >>>propaganda machine and toss some insults at you instead,
> >>>so save your self the trouble and let it go...
>
> >>Are you in favor of the Chinese occupation?  I will look at the photos
> >>and see what I think.  As usual, you like to decide for me what I will
> >>do or say or think, please refrain.  When you do that, you show your
own
> >>unwholesome tendencies.  You descend to making things up, judging,
> >>making pronouncements about others.  You do not commend yourself to
> >>those heavenly forces you supposedly adhere to when you behave this
way.
> >>   Shame on you again, back to your mean little tricks.
>
> > Hey. Did you read this? what do you think about it?
>
> >  http://www.swans.com/library/art9/mparen01.html
>
>
>
> In either case, the Tibetan people are better off governing themselves,
> not governed by a feudal hierarchy, and not governed by the PRC.

makes sense. what about starting in your own back yard? what part of
america
are you going to give back to the native indians so that they can
govern themself?

"By conservative estimates, the population of the United states prior
to European contact was greater than 12 million. Four centuries later,
the count was reduced by 95% to 237 thousand."


Texas?
 




 754 Posts in Topic:
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 13:21:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-21 13:23:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 05:51:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:19:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-21 08:15:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
sb5309@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-20 23:46:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 15:20:55 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 07:58:06 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 07:27:23 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 20:05:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:48:08 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:51:25 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:46:41 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 21:31:39 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:43:52 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 01:58:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:52:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-22 04:29:42 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:56:30 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 04:52:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:34:07 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:45:50 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:16:02 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:02:47 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:59:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:27:33 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:57:09 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:24:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:31:56 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 20:29:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 23:34:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 18:36:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:46:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 20:55:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 16:39:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 17:02:02 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 08:22:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 18:10:10 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:36:27 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:16:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:54:34 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:41:58 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:17:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD  2008-04-21 22:00:28 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:36:37 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:20:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:07:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:43:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:13:46 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 23:09:37 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:26:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:20:44 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 21:34:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 05:08:26 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-30 16:45:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-25 18:53:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:56:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 00:07:29 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 19:19:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:55:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-26 16:39:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:55:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:05:00 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-30 01:40:24 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-30 09:17:10 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:09:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:50:11 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 07:12:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:10:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:52:14 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:15:17 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:25:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:22:31 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-23 13:56:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 18:01:32 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 22:34:22 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 02:21:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:32:41 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:46:10 
Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:50:39 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:03:59 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:41:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:52:20 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:31:56 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:09:12 
Re: Just let people date on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:21:56 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:39:21 
Re: Just let people votey on the Internet.
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 00:47:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:30:10 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:45:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:53:37 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:07:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:07:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:56:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-24 22:06:05 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:26:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 08:38:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:59:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:45:38 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:00:50 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:52:00 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 19:46:18 
Re: simply not acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-23 20:35:25 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:22:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:52:20 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:41:56 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 10:09:15 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:56:26 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:04:13 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:05:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:12:24 
Re: simply not acceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-24 11:13:34 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:27:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:23:30 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:26:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
Duke Lama <dukelama@[E  2008-04-24 22:35:10 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:18:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:36:44 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:22:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:24:01 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:49:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:39:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:23:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:43:11 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:47:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 09:53:23 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:34:42 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 11:37:36 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:14:19 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:10:06 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:01:59 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:17:39 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 04:21:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 00:26:33 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 06:24:24 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 07:51:03 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 10:07:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:44:08 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:12:17 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-27 19:10:12 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 01:20:28 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-04-28 19:27:40 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:32:57 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-28 19:43:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:43:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 10:57:50 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 06:44:50 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:00:05 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:14:52 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:29:27 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:04:57 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:27:35 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:55:29 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:25:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:38:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:58:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:35:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:16:28 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:23:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:39:59 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:07:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-25 10:53:01 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:39:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:33:33 
The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 23:31:08 
Re: The Evidence for Slavery in America is abundant.
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-28 22:53:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:00:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
"Julian" <Ju  2008-04-26 12:56:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:08:00 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 12:53:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-27 20:01:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 21:06:25 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 19:50:14 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 08:23:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:08:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 02:04:36 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-26 16:23:41 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 00:03:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-27 01:43:24 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 09:13:39 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 13:57:13 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-29 14:00:04 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 13:47:09 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 21:40:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 19:50:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:41:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-24 19:17:47 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:53:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 21:26:50 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:58:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 22:46:15 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:21:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 16:26:06 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:23:16 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:35:19 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 01:32:55 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:38:45 
Re: let them have a national referendum or snakes in my house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 11:20:31 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:15:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 12:41:51 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 13:07:48 
Re: let them have a national referendum
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-27 21:19:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 20:07:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-29 04:42:57 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 08:51:08 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 09:09:07 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-30 03:28:21 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 10:36:35 
Re: let them have a national referendum
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-25 21:01:17 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 15:45:50 
Re: snakes in the house
small tortoiseshell <_  2008-04-28 19:01:43 
Re: snakes in the house
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 23:48:33 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 11:46:53 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 02:50:05 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 19:49:22 
Re: let them have a national referendum
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:55:27 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-26 21:42:12 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 20:15:42 
Re: let them have a national referendum
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 22:15:12 
The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:42:18 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:02:28 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:39:57 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 02:17:34 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:08:50 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:39:24 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 16:21:23 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:24:43 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 16:39:41 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:13:20 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:34:46 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
"J.Venning" <  2008-04-24 20:41:04 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:21:39 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:59:02 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:32:14 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:54:05 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:13:00 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:29:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:25:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-22 21:43:33 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:37:02 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:52:55 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:20:26 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:48:20 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:13:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:34 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:19:44 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:07:31 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 19:10:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 22:20:21 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:32:29 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:36:29 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 15:53:13 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:05:10 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:58:46 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 11:16:15 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:21:35 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:44:03 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 21:52:26 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:51:57 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:46:41 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:23:23 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-22 17:15:32 
Re: Just let people vote on the Internet.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 14:34:18 
let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:47:54 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:18:30 
Re: let them have a national referendum
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:13:49 
Re: let them have a national referendum
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:07:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 17:51:09 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:20:12 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:16:58 
Re: The Chinese government is run by morons
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:11:33 
How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:45:21 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:11:54 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:52:06 
Re: How do you explain the riots?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 03:18:58 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 21:48:56 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:19:44 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 22:57:15 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:30:38 
Re: so silly
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 10:38:20 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-22 19:46:50 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 03:43:46 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:05:01 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 23:54:12 
Re: Dalai Lama and LamuDengzhu._DanzhenjiaCuo
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-04-24 20:29:52 
Re: simply not acceptable
bluej <fjing11@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 14:46:17 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:53:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 15:24:53 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-23 22:42:45 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:15:08 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:29:26 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 03:27:11 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:02:55 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 21:15:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:33:48 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:10 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:42:36 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:26:44 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:12:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:22:35 
Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are create
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-21 02:37:10 
The principle of "All men are created equal".
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-21 19:59:05 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
"RussellT" <  2008-04-21 13:33:14 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 18:12:16 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:42:34 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:57:13 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 01:58:05 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:28:03 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 23:54:34 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-23 21:39:28 
Re: so silly
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 13:45:20 
Re: so silly
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 00:06:20 
Re: so silly
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-24 07:26:39 
Re: so silly
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 14:20:30 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 19:02:39 
Re: You really should listen to the Tibetan people.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 20:37:40 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-22 16:21:36 
Re: simply not acceptable
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-23 20:17:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 04:28:02 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:57:29 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 22:29:19 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 01:49:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-24 18:55:01 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"possum" <ze  2008-04-25 02:36:54 
Re: hello and welcome...simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 03:48:39 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 00:20:31 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-25 04:48:54 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 01:53:18 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 01:25:22 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 21:45:41 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-26 12:48:33 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
"Used To Be Your Bel  2008-04-27 22:45:55 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-28 01:54:01 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 10:33:48 
Re: simply not girlcottingly acceptable
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-27 22:49:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:42:57 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 20:43:39 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 21:10:41 
Re: simply not acceptable
cnniscrap@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-23 23:03:27 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 14:38:12 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 05:26:07 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 20:35:22 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:17:49 
Re: simply not acceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-26 15:24:35 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:30:16 
Re: simply not acceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:33:11 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 06:35:07 
Re: simply not acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:01:52 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:38:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:45:30 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:47:50 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 11:47:45 
Re: simply not rat bastardly acceptable
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-24 12:48:52 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-04-25 11:15:08 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-25 11:38:39 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 16:02:38 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are crea
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-26 07:07:51 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-04-21 15:38:14 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Peter Terpstra <peter@  2008-04-21 23:21:53 
Re: Westerners need to accept the principle of "All men are cr
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-04-21 20:05:31 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 16:59:50 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:00:20 
Re: Simply unacceptable.
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 17:09:52 
Unacceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-24 13:51:50 
Re: Unacceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-26 19:18:37 
Re: Unacceptable
"." <.@[EMAI  2008-04-27 10:25:11 
Re: Unacceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-27 12:36:31 
Re: Unacceptable
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-27 09:09:22 
Re: Unacceptable
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-04-28 00:18:06 
Re: Unacceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-28 15:41:26 
Re: Unacceptable
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-04-28 15:44:12