On Thu, 1 May 2008 19:52:13 +0800, fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
(in article
<14dee96c-e06c-491b-9acc-fd1a1ac9f718@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
> On 5月1日, 下午2时22分, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:34:53 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
>> (in article
>> <7458415c-017d-4830-8c53-5dbb96951...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>>
>>
>>
>>> I think the truth regarding Tibet is as follows: (1) CCP did free the
>>> slaves
>>> in Tibet when it first came to Tibet (2) Mao did turn the Tibetans,
>>> together
>>> with the people in other provinces of China, into slaves again for a
new
>>> slave owner named Mao. (3) CCP is now called Chinese Capitalist Party
and
>>> is
>>> doing a wonderful job in lifting many Tibetans out of poverty and
turning
>>> them into petty bourgeois.
>>
>> Even if everything above were true, it does not justify the denial of
human
>> rights such as voting.
>
> I am not sure if voting represents a human right under any
> cir***stances. At any rate, since no voting is being allowed in all
> other provinces, why should Tibet in particular have it?
I do not sup****t special rights for Tibetans.
On the other hand, were the Tibetans given the right to vote, that would
be a
step in the right direction.
--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
|
