Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: WHO SAYS TH...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 72 of 271 Topic 45500 of 53285
Post > Topic >>

Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?

by Chung Wiu <chungwiu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 2, 2008 at 07:55 PM

rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:=20
> On May 2, 10:12=A0am, Viejo Vizcacha <nats_ugly...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 2, 12:51 pm, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> >
> > > These people continue to say you can not use the internet from
China.
> > > You, Francis Poon, are a prime example they are wrong as you ARE
usin=
g
> > > the internet from China on a regular daily baisis.
> >
> > If you are an agent of the Chinese government, OF COURSE you can use
> > the internet from China.
>=20
>=20
> Let's just say you are a brainwashed idiotic fool.
>=20
Internet censor****p in the PRC has been called "a panopticon that
encourage=
s=20
self-censor****p through the perception that users are being watched".[8]
Th=
e=20
enforcement (or threat of enforcement) of censor****p creates a chilling=20
effect where individuals and businesses willingly censor their own=20
communications to avoid legal and economic repercussions.

Search engines

    See also: List of words censored by search engines in the People's=20
Republic of China

One part of the block is to filter the search results of certain terms on=
=20
Chinese search engines. These Chinese search engines include both=20
international ones (for example, yahoo.com.cn and Google China) as well
as=
=20
domestic ones (for example, Baidu). Attempting to search for censored=20
keywords in these Chinese search engines will yield few or no results.=20
Google.cn will display the following at the bottom of the page: "According
=
to=20
the local laws, regulations and policies, part of the searching result is
n=
ot=20
shown."

In addition, a connection containing intensive censored terms may also be=
=20
closed by The Great Firewall, and cannot be reestablished for several=20
minutes. This affects all network connections including HTTP and POP, but
t=
he=20
reset is more likely to occur during searching.

Before the search engines censored themselves, many search engines had
been=
=20
blocked, namely Google and AltaVista.[22] Technorati, a search engine for=
=20
blogs, has been blocked.[23]

[edit] Cernet

Several Bulletin Board Systems in universities were closed down or
restrict=
ed=20
public access since 2004, including the SMTH BBS and the YTHT BBS.[24]

[edit] Local businesses

Although blocking foreign sites has received much attention in the West,
th=
is=20
is actually only a part of the PRC effort to censor the Internet. The
abili=
ty=20
to censor content providers within mainland China is much more effective,
a=
s=20
the ISPs and other service providers are restricting customers' actions
for=
=20
fear of being found legally liable for customers' conduct. The service=20
providers have assumed an editorial role with regard to customer content,=
=20
thus became publishers, and legally responsible for libel and other torts=
=20
committed by customers.

Although the government does not have the physical resources to monitor
all=
=20
Internet chat rooms and forums, the threat of being shut down has
caused=20
Internet content providers to employ internal staff, colloquially known
as=
=20
"big mamas", who stop and remove forum comments which may be
politically=20
sensitive. In Shenzhen, these duties are partly taken over by a pair of=20
police-created cartoon characters, Jingjing and Chacha, who help extend
the=
=20
online 'police presence' of the Shenzhen authorities.

However, Internet content providers have adopted some counter-strategies.
O=
ne=20
is to post politically sensitive stories and remove them only when the=20
government complains. In the hours or days in which the story is
available=
=20
online, people read it, and by the time the story is taken down, the=20
information is already public. One notable case in which this occurred was
=
in=20
response to a school explosion in 2001, when local officials tried to=20
suppress the fact the explosion resulted from children illegally
producing=
=20
fireworks. By the time local officials forced the story to be removed
from=
=20
the Internet, the news had already been widely disseminated.

In addition, Internet content providers often replace censored forum
commen=
ts=20
with white space which allows the reader to know that comments critical
of=
=20
the authorities had been submitted, and often to guess what they might
have=
=20
been.

In July 2007, the city of Xiamen announced it would ban anonymous
online=20
postings after text messages and online communications were used to rally=
=20
protests against a proposed chemical plant in the city. Internet users
will=
=20
be required to provide proof of identify when posting messages on the
more=
=20
than 100,000 Web sites registered in Xiamen.[25]

Some hotels in China are also advising internet users to obey local
Chinese=
=20
internet access rules by leaving a list of internet rules and guidelines
ne=
ar=20
the computers. These rules, among other things, forbid linking to
political=
ly=20
unacceptable messages, and inform internet users that if they do, they
will=
=20
have to face legal consequences.[26]

In September 2007, some data centers were shutting down indiscriminately
fo=
r=20
providing interactive features such as blogs and forums. CBS re****ts an=20
estimate that half the interactive sites hosted in China were blocked.
[27]

[edit] International cor****ations

One controversial issue is whether foreign companies should supply
equipmen=
t=20
which assists in the blocking of sites to the PRC government. Some argue
th=
at=20
it is wrong for companies to profit from censor****p including restrictions
=
on=20
freedom of the press and freedom of speech. Others argue that equipment
bei=
ng=20
supplied, from companies such as the American based Cisco Systems Inc.,
is=
=20
standard Internet infrastructure equipment and that providing this sort
of=
=20
equipment actually aids the flow of information, and that the PRC is
fully=
=20
able to create its own infrastructure without Western help. By
contrast,=20
human rights advocates such as Human Rights Watch and media groups such
as=
=20
Re****ters Without Borders argue that if companies would stop contributing
t=
o=20
the authorities' censor****p efforts the government could be forced to
chang=
e.

A similar dilemma faces foreign content providers such as Yahoo!, AOL,
Goog=
le=20
and Skype who abide by PRC government wishes, including having internal=20
content monitors, in order to be able to operate within mainland China.
Als=
o,=20
in accordance with mainland Chinese laws, Microsoft began to censor the=20
content of its blog service Windows Live Spaces, arguing continuing to=20
provide Internet services is more beneficial to the Chinese.[28]
Michael=20
Anti, a Chinese journalist whose blog on Windows Live Spaces was removed
by=
=20
Microsoft, agreed that the Chinese are better off with Windows Live
Spaces=
=20
than without it.[29]

The Chinese version of MySpace, launched in April of 2007, has many=20
censor****p-related differences from other international versions of the=20
service. Discussion forums on topics such as religion and politics are
abse=
nt=20
and a filtering system that prevents the posting of content about
Taiwan=20
independence, the Dalai Lama, Falun Gong, and other "inappropriate
topics"=
=20
has been added.[30] Users are also given the ability to re****t the=20
"misconduct" of other users for offenses including "endangering
national=20
security, leaking state secrets, subverting the government, undermining=20
national unity, spreading rumors or disturbing the social order."[31]

[edit] Reactions

[edit] Legal action

May 9th 2007, Mr. Yetaai (??) sued Shanghai Telecom, a sub-company of
China=
=20
Telecom, because one of his sites[citation needed] was blocked from access
=
in=20
China. He then took a series of steps including raising maintenance
request=
=20
and notarization. His lawsuit was accepted by Pu Dong Court, Shanghai.
Mr.=
=20
Yetaai re****ted it through his online diary (English). He also raised an
it=
em=20
for online ticketing through an article on Digg.

[edit] Liberalization of ***ually oriented content

Although restrictions on political information remain as strong as
ever,=20
several ***ually oriented blogs began appearing in early 2004. Women
using=
=20
the web aliases Muzi Mei (???) and Zhuying Qingtong (????) wrote online=20
diaries of their *** lives and became small celebrities. This was
widely=20
re****ted and criticized in mainland Chinese news media, and several of
thes=
e=20
bloggers' sites are blocked in China to this day. This has coincided with
a=
n=20
artistic **** photography fad (including a self-published book by dancer
Ta=
ng=20
Jiali) and the appearance of pictures of minimally clad women or even
tople=
ss=20
photos in a few mainland Chinese newspapers, magazines and websites. It
is=
=20
too early to tell how far this trend will go, but increasingly, censor****p
=
is=20
applicable to political content rather than to ***uality. This does not
hol=
d=20
true for many dating and "adult chat" sites, both Chinese and foreign,
whic=
h=20
have been blocked. Some, however, continue to be accessible although this=
=20
appears to be due more to the Chinese government's ignorance of their=20
existence than any particular policy of leniency.

[edit] Cor****ate responsibility

On November 7, 2005 an alliance of investors and researchers representing=
=20
twenty-six companies in the U.S., Europe and Australia with over US $21=20
billion in joint assets announced that they were urging businesses to
prote=
ct=20
freedom of expression and pledged to monitor technology companies that do=
=20
business in countries violating human rights, such as China. On December
21=
,=20
2005 the UN, OSCE and OAS special mandates on freedom of expression called
=
on=20
Internet cor****ations to "work together ... to resist official attempts
to=
=20
control or restrict use of the Internet."

[edit] Efforts at breaking through
=09This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
Please improve this article if you can (September 2007).
Wikibooks
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of
Transwiki:Bypassing the Great Firewall of China

The firewall is largely ineffective at preventing the flow of information
a=
nd=20
is rather easily cir***vented by determined parties by using proxy
servers=
=20
outside the firewall. VPN and SSH connections to outside mainland China
are=
=20
not blocked, so cir***venting all of the censor****p and monitoring
features=
=20
of the Great Firewall of China is trivial for those who have these secure=
=20
connection methods to computers outside mainland China available to them.

Since free hosting blog services like Blogger and Wordpress frequently
face=
=20
blockage, bloggers and webmasters aiming for an audience in China often=20
debate merits of the various paid hosting services. Some China-focussed=20
services explicitly offer to move IP address within 30 minutes if your
site=
=20
is blocked by the authorities.[32]

Anonymizer, Inc. provides a free service to allow uncensored and
anonymous=
=20
browsing in China. The software is available through a number of sources,=
=20
including a China-accessible website.

Psiphon[33] is a software project designed by University of Toronto's
Citiz=
en=20
Lab under the direction of Professor Ronald Deibert, Director of the
Citize=
n=20
Lab. Psiphon is a cir***vention technology that works through social
networ=
ks=20
of trust and is designed to help Internet users bypass
content-filtering=20
systems set up by governments, such as China, North Korea, Iran, Saudi=20
Arabia, United Arab Emirates and others.

    "We're aiming at giving people access to sites like Wikipedia," a
free,=
=20
user-maintained online encyclopedia, and other information and news
sources=
,=20
Michael Hull, psiphon's lead engineer, told CBC News Online.[34]

Neither the Tor website nor the Tor network are blocked, making Tor (in=20
conjunction with Privoxy) an easily acquired and effective tool for=20
cir***vention of the censor****p controls. Tor maintains a public list
of=20
entry nodes, so the authorities could easily block it if they had the=20
inclination. According to the Tor FAQ sections 6.4 and 7.9, Tor is
vulnerab=
le=20
to timing analysis by Chinese authorities, so it allows a breach of=20
anonymity. Thus for the moment, Tor allows uncensored downloads and
uploads=
,=20
although no guarantee can be made with regard to freedom from
repercussions=
..

In addition to Tor, there are various HTTP/HTTPS Tunnel Services, which
wor=
k=20
in a similar way as Tor. At least one of them, Your Freedom, is confirmed
t=
o=20
be working from China and also offers encryption features for the
transmitt=
ed=20
traffic.

It was common in the past to use Google's cache feature to view blocked=20
websites. However, this feature of Google seems to be under some level of=
=20
blocking, as access is now erratic and does not work for blocked
websites.=
=20
Currently the block is mostly cir***vented by using proxy servers outside
t=
he=20
firewall, and is not difficult to carry out for those determined to do
so.=
=20
Some well-known proxy servers have also been blocked.

Some Chinese citizens used the Google mirror elgooG after China blocked=20
Google. It is believed that elgooG survived the Great Firewall of China=20
because the firewall operators thought that elgooG was not a fully
function=
al=20
version of Google.

As Falun Gong websites are generally inaccessible from mainland China,=20
practitioners have launched a company named UltraReach Internet Corp
and=20
developed a piece of software named UltraSurf to enable people in
mainland=
=20
China to access restricted web sites via Internet Explorer without
being=20
detected.

Other techniques used include Freenet, a peer-to-peer distributed data
stor=
e=20
allowing members to anonymously send or retrieve information, and=20
TriangleBoy.

Browsing Wikipedia is also possible with a custom browser called
Gollum,=20
which can be used without installing it. At present, the Chinese
government=
=20
has not banned searching for Gollum on Google.
 




 271 Posts in Topic:
WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 09:32:05 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-02 09:37:06 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 10:29:37 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 15:12:06 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 12:56:17 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 03:42:15 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:37:30 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 09:10:52 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 12:41:17 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:41:18 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:26:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:23:20 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 05:46:28 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:23:06 
Proving that cults are not caused by Religious Freedom
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 13:48:32 
Re: Proving that cults are not caused by Religious Freedom
abelard <abelard3@[EMA  2008-05-04 14:52:56 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 00:10:01 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 03:53:55 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 04:53:21 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 04:57:53 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 05:07:13 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 05:19:29 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 05:38:17 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 05:38:50 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:40:25 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 05:49:16 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 05:55:29 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 09:15:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 09:12:13 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 12:42:51 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:43:10 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:27:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:24:24 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 05:47:48 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:26:43 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:26:27 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 19:21:30 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 13:41:35 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:04:27 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:44:37 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 05:42:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 22:00:26 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"A. J. Moss" &l  2008-05-02 09:38:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 09:51:00 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:00:54 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 06:16:25 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 09:54:09 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 10:30:27 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:49:31 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-03 00:59:13 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Viejo Vizcacha <nats_u  2008-05-02 10:12:21 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:08:42 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"A. J. Moss" &l  2008-05-02 10:28:31 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 10:40:29 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 11:54:48 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:53:33 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 05:09:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"A. J. Moss" &l  2008-05-02 10:53:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-02 12:08:24 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 12:54:34 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"TFK" <tfkmj  2008-05-03 10:18:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 17:39:36 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:33:16 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-02 12:48:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 12:52:10 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 12:53:48 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 12:56:11 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 17:37:25 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:56:01 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:42:10 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 12:57:15 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Chung Wiu <chungwiu@[E  2008-05-02 19:55:30 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 17:41:47 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 06:38:28 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 06:48:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 07:52:11 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 08:57:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 13:04:57 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:38:26 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:50:44 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:13:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 06:04:29 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-02 12:58:52 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:13:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-02 21:09:18 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-02 14:37:26 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 20:16:22 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:03:06 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 17:35:44 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 20:46:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 18:11:15 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 21:25:45 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 18:50:26 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 21:58:28 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 22:00:15 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 20:31:09 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 23:42:13 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:45:30 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:43:21 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-02 15:01:23 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:45:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 16:25:37 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 06:44:00 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 22:00:39 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 16:27:19 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 16:32:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-02 17:16:31 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 17:40:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:37:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Senior Fellow <seniorf  2008-05-03 04:49:37 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:30:41 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 08:54:50 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 05:33:33 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 08:56:01 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 12:24:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:34:43 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 04:58:55 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 09:23:33 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 16:02:09 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 17:16:38 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 05:38:06 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:36:27 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:36:39 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:03:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 05:42:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 17:51:48 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 18:10:34 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:52:35 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 06:21:39 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:31:27 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 06:54:28 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 06:43:45 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 07:43:06 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 07:57:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 08:19:00 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:33:32 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:35:26 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:11:24 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 05:55:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 22:01:28 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:26:20 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:28:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:31:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:42:50 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:09:50 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 05:59:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 21:56:24 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:27:52 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 14:00:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 12:57:10 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:46:32 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 12:57:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 06:01:44 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:50:59 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 17:53:18 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:14:36 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 17:54:57 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-03 15:18:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 19:04:40 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 19:05:22 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 20:29:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 19:20:43 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 20:31:39 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:49:13 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:49:54 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-02 19:42:31 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 23:01:48 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 19:44:48 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 22:51:51 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-02 20:34:00 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
BOB <sd@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-03 04:02:10 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 00:15:52 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
BOB <sd@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-03 04:24:03 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 00:30:59 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 20:20:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 23:53:40 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 23:55:03 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 21:54:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 02:00:15 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:16:33 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
dpp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 23:00:51 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 02:18:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
dpp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-02 23:39:38 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 02:51:45 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 00:42:20 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:19:29 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 00:45:23 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:55:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 17:58:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 06:03:30 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:32:48 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 09:00:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 16:24:20 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Polly the Parrot <flat  2008-05-03 19:00:27 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 18:35:55 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Polly the Parrot <flat  2008-05-03 19:43:54 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 05:57:40 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Polly the Parrot <flat  2008-05-03 20:27:16 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 06:37:45 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 04:13:16 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 04:15:53 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Polly the Parrot <flat  2008-05-03 21:20:49 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Spork <spork@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 07:49:38 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 21:55:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 04:50:04 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 06:56:39 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 22:12:40 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 06:59:22 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 22:12:39 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Wild Herb <wild.herb@[  2008-05-03 10:53:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Bung Woo <bungwoo@[EMA  2008-05-03 10:59:18 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 09:01:53 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 07:06:47 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 22:18:26 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Viejo Vizcacha <nats_u  2008-05-03 07:13:25 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 22:21:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Wild Herb <wild.herb@[  2008-05-03 10:41:50 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 07:42:51 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 11:46:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 07:50:40 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-03 08:20:45 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 09:16:39 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:30:04 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:31:58 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-03 09:49:47 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:33:32 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-03 10:15:34 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:26:02 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 13:52:44 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 13:51:35 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-03 10:19:22 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 12:23:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 13:55:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-03 14:15:33 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 14:47:57 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 13:53:23 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-03 14:19:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-03 14:46:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-03 19:24:20 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 09:18:40 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-03 20:39:18 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:41:21 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-03 20:48:07 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-04 13:57:15 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:41:22 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 01:16:54 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 16:37:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 16:38:47 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 01:19:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 16:40:34 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 01:21:59 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:36:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 01:26:03 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 01:29:24 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 16:37:05 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 01:34:00 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 13:41:23 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 14:25:46 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 13:07:26 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 16:27:54 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-05-04 17:16:45 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-04 16:29:56 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 16:34:56 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 01:53:12 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 22:20:33 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 01:54:54 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 22:16:20 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-05 07:11:33 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 22:48:08 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
Jake <TruthHunterr@[EM  2008-05-05 07:24:18 
Re: WHO SAYS THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN CHINA?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-05 10:45:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 5:44:03 CST 2008.