ROGUE PRESIDENT OF BANKRUPT U.S.A. STILL ITCHING TO PULL THE TRIGGER
ON IRAN? =91How Under-the-Gun Iran Plays it Cool=92 =96 =91Secret Bush
"Finding" Widens War On Iran: Democrats Okay Funds for Covert Ops=92
- o O o -
How Under-the-Gun Iran Plays it Cool
By Pepe Escobar
Asia Times,
2 May, 2005
More than two years ago, Seymour Hersh disclosed in the New Yorker how
President George W Bush was considering strategic nuclear strikes
against Iran. Ever since, a campaign to demonize that country has
proceeded in a relentless, Terminator-like way, applying the same
techniques and semantic contortions that were so familiar in the
period before the Bush administration launched its invasion of Iraq.
The campaign's greatest hits are widely known: "The ayatollahs" are
building a ****'ite nuclear bomb; Iranian weapons are killing American
soldiers in Iraq; Iranian gunboats are provoking US war****ps in the
Persian Gulf. Iran, in short, is the new al-Qaeda, a terror state
aimed at the heart of the United States. It's idle to expect the
American mainstream media to offer any tools that might put this
orchestrated blitzkrieg in context.
Here are just a few recent instances of the ongoing campaign:
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates insists that Iran "is hell-bent on
acquiring nuclear weapons". Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, admits that the Pentagon is planning for
"potential military courses of action" when it comes to Iran. In
tandem with US commander in Iraq General David Petraeus, Mullen
denounces Iran's "increasingly lethal and malign influence" in Iraq,
although he claims to harbor "no expectations" of an attack on Iran
"in the immediate future" and even admits he has "no smoking gun which
could prove that the highest leader****p [of Iran] is involved".
But keep in mind one thing the Great Saddam take-out of 2003 proved:
that a "smoking gun" is, in the end, irrelevant. And this week, the US
is ominously floating a second aircraft carrier battle group into the
Persian Gulf.
But what of Iran itself under the blizzard of charges and threats?
What to make of it? What does the world look like from Tehran? Here
are five ways to think about Iran under the gun and to better decode
the Iranian chessboard.
1. Don't underestimate the power of ****'ite Islam: Seventy-five
percent of the world's oil reserves are in the Persian Gulf. Seventy
percent of the Gulf's population is ****'ite. ****'ism is an
eschatological - and revolutionary - religion, fueled by a passionate
mixture of romanticism and cosmic despair. As much as it may instill
fear in hegemonic Sunni Islam, some Westerners should feel a certain
empathy for intellectual ****'ism's almost Sartrean nausea towards the
vacuous material world.
For more than 1,000 years, ****'ite Islam has, in fact, been a galaxy
of ****'isms - a kind of Fourth World of its own, always cursed by
political exclusion and implacable economic marginalization, always
carrying an immensely dramatic view of history with it.
It's impossible to understand Iran without grasping the contradiction
that the Iranian religious leader****p faces in ruling, however
fractiously, a nation state. In the minds of Iran's religious leaders,
the very concept of the nation-state is regarded with deep suspicion,
because it detracts from the umma, the global Muslim community. The
nation-state, as they see it, is but a way-station on the road to the
final triumph of ****'ism and pure Islam.
To venture beyond the present stage of history, however, they also
recognize the necessity of reinforcing the nation-state that offers
****'ism a sanctuary - and that, of course, happens to be Iran. When
****'ism finally triumphs, the concept of nation-state - a heritage, in
any case, of the West - will disappear, replaced by a community
organized according to the will of Prophet Mohammad.
In the right context, this is, believe me, a powerful message. I
briefly became a mashti - a pilgrim visiting a privileged ****'ite
gateway to Paradise, the holy shrine of Imam Reza in Mashhad, four
hours west of the Iran-Afghan border. At sunset, the only foreigner
lost in a pious multitude of black chadors and white turbans occupying
every square inch of the huge walled shrine, I felt a tremendous
emotional jolt. And I wasn't even a believer, just a simple infidel.
2. Geography is destiny: Whenever I go to the holy city of Qom,
bordering the central deserts in Iran, I am always reminded, in no
uncertain terms, that, as far as the major ayatollahs are concerned,
their supreme mission is to convert the rest of Islam to the original
purity and revolutionary power of ****'ism - a religion invariably
critical of the established social and political order.
Even a ****'ite leader in Tehran, however, can't simply live by
preaching and conversion alone. Iran, after all, happens to be a
nation-state at the crucial intersection of the Arabic, Turkish,
Russian and Indian worlds. It is the key transit point of the Middle
East, the Persian Gulf, Central Asia, the Caucasus, and the Indian sub-
continent. It lies between three seas (the Caspian, the Persian Gulf
and the sea of Oman). Close to Europe and yet at the gates of Asia (in
fact part of Southwest Asia), Iran is the ultimate Eurasian
crossroads. Isfahan, the country's third-largest city, is roughly
equidistant from Paris and Shanghai. No wonder US Vice President Dick
Cheney, checking out Iran, "salivates like a Pavlov dog" (to quote
those rock 'n roll geopoliticians, the Rolling Stones).
Members of the Iranian upper middle cl***** in north Tehran might spin
dreams of Iran recapturing the expansive range of influence once held
by the Persian empire; but the silky, Qom-carpet-like diplomats at the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs will assure you that what they really
dream of is an Iran respected as a major regional power.
To this end, they have little choice, faced with the enmity of the
globe's "sole superpower", but to employ a sophisticated counter-
encirclement foreign policy. After all, Iran is now completely
surrounded by post-September 11 American military bases in
Afghanistan, Central Asia, Iraq and the Gulf states. It faces the US
military on its Afghan, Iraqi, Pakistani and Persian Gulf borders, and
lives with ever-tightening US economic sanctions, as well as a
continuing drumbeat of Bush administration threats involving possible
air assaults on Iranian nuclear (and probably other) facilities.
The Iranian counter-response to sanctions and to its demonization as a
rogue or pariah state has been to develop a "Look East" foreign policy
that is, in itself, a challenge to American energy hegemony in the
Gulf. The policy has been conducted with great skill by Foreign
Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, who was educated in Bangalore, India.
While focused on massive energy deals with China, India and Pakistan,
it looks as well to Africa and Latin America. To the horror of
American neo-cons, an intercontinental "axis of evil" air link already
exists - a weekly commercial Tehran-Caracas flight via Iran Air.
Iran's diplomatic (and energy) reach is now striking. When I was in
Bolivia this year, I learned of a tour Iran's ambassador to Venezuela
had taken on the jet of Bolivian President Evo Morales. The ambassador
re****tedly offered Morales "everything he wanted" to offset the
influence of "American imperialism".
Meanwhile, a fierce energy competition is developing among the Turks,
Iranians, Russians, Chinese and Americans - all placing their bets on
which future trade routes will be the crucial ones as oil and natural
gas flow out of Central Asia.
As a player, Iran is trying to position itself as the unavoidable
bazaar-state in an oil-and-gas-fueled new Silk Road - the backbone of
a new Asian energy security grid. That's how it could recover some of
the preeminence it enjoyed in the distant era of Darius, the King of
Kings. And that's the main reason why US neo-Cold Warriors, Zio-cons,
armchair imperialists, or all of the above, are throwing such a
collective - and threatening - fit.
3. What is Ahmadinejad up to?: Ever since the days when former Iranian
president Mohammed Khatami suggested a "dialogue of civilizations",
Iranian diplomats have endlessly repeated the official position on
Iran's nuclear program: it's peaceful; the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) has found no proof of the military development of
nuclear power; the religious leader****p opposes atomic weapons; and
Iran - unlike the US - has not invaded or attacked any nation for the
past quarter millennium.
Think of George W Bush and Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad as the
new Blues Brothers: both believe they are on a mission from God. Both
are religious fundamentalists. Ahmadinejad believes fervently in the
imminent return of the Mahdi, the ****'ite messiah, who "disappeared"
and has remained hidden since the ninth century. Bush believes
fervently in a coming end and the return of Jesus Christ. But only
Bush, despite his actual invasions and constant threats, gets a (sort
of) free pass from the Western ideological machine, while Ahmadinejad
is ****trayed as a Hitlerian believer in a new Holocaust.
Ahmadinejad is relentlessly depicted as an angry, totally irrational,
Jew-hating, Holocaust-denying Islamo-fascist who wants to "wipe Israel
off the map". That infamous quote, repeated ad nauseam but out of
context, comes from an October 2005 speech at an obscure anti-Zionist
student conference. What Ahmadinejad really said, in a literal
translation from Farsi, was that "the regime occupying Jerusalem must
vanish from the pages of time". He was actually quoting the leader of
the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who said it
first in the early 1980s. Khomeini hoped that a regime so unjust
toward the Palestinians would be replaced by another more equitable
one. He was not, however, threatening to nuke Israel.
In the 1980s, in the bitterest years of the Iran-Iraq war, Khomeini
also made it very clear that the production, possession or use of
nuclear weapons is against Islam. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei later issued a fatwa - a religious injunction - under the
same terms. For the theocratic regime, however, the Iranian nuclear
program is a powerful symbol of independence vis-a-vis what is still
widely considered by Iranians of all social cl***** and educational
backgrounds as Anglo-Saxon colonialism.
Ahmadinejad is mad for the Iranian nuclear program. It's his bread and
butter in terms of domestic popularity. During the Iran-Iraq war, he
was a member of a sup****t team aiding anti-Saddam Hussein Kurdish
forces. (That's when he became friends with "Uncle" Jalal Talabani,
now the Kurdish president of Iraq.) Not many presidents have been
trained in guerrilla warfare. Speculation is rampant in Tehran that
Ahmadinejad, the leader****p of the Quds Force, an elite division of
the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), plus the hardcore
volunteer militia, the Basij (informally known in Iran as "the army of
20 million"), are betting on a US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities
to strengthen the country's theocratic regime and their faction of
it.
Reformists refer to Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to Tehran
last October, when he was received by the Supreme Leader (a very rare
honor). Putin offered a new plan to resolve the explosive Iranian
nuclear dossier: Iran would halt nuclear enrichment on Iranian soil in
return for peaceful nuclear cooperation and development in league with
Russia, the Europeans, and the IAEA.
Iran's top nuclear negotiator of that moment, Ali Larijani, a
confidant of Supreme Leader Khamenei, as well as the leader himself
let it be known that the idea would be seriously considered. But
Ahmadinejad immediately contradicted the Supreme Leader in public.
Even more startling, yet evidently with the leader's acquiescence, he
then sacked Larijani and replaced him with a longtime friend, Saeed
Jalili, an ideological hardliner.
4. A velvet revolution is not around the corner: Before the 2005
Iranian elections, at a secret, high-level meeting of the ruling
ayatollahs in his house, the Supreme Leader concluded that Ahmadinejad
would be able to revive the regime with his populist rhetoric and
pious conservatism, which then seemed very appealing to the
downtrodden m*****. (Curiously enough, Ahmadinejad's campaign motto
was: "We can.")
But the ruling ayatollahs miscalculated. Since they controlled all key
levers of power - the Supreme National Security Council, the Council
of Guardians, the Judiciary, the bonyads (Islamic foundations that
control vast sections of the economy), the army, the IRGC (the
parallel army created by Khomeini in 1979 and recently branded a
terrorist organization by the Bush administration), the media - they
assumed they would also control the self-described "street cleaner of
the people". How wrong they have been.
For Khamenei himself, this was big business. After 18 years of non-
stop internal struggle, he was finally in full control of executive
power, as well as of the legislature, the judiciary, the IRGC, the
Basij, and the key ayatollahs in Qom.
Ahmadinejad, for his part, unleashed his own agenda. He purged the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of many reformist-minded diplomats;
encouraged the Interior Ministry and the Ministry of Culture and
Islamic Guidance to crackdown on all forms of "nefarious" Western
influences, from entertainment industry products to colorful made-in-
India scarves for women; and filled his cabinet with revolutionary
friends from the Iran-Iraq war days. These friends proved to be as
faithful as administratively incompetent - especially in terms of
economic policy. Instead of solidifying the theocratic leader****p
under Supreme Leader Khamenei, Ahmadinejad increasingly fractured an
increasingly unpopular ruling elite.
Nonetheless, discontent with Ahmadinejad's economic incompetence has
not translated into street barricades and it probably will not; nor,
contrary to neo-con fantasy land scenarios, would an attack on Iran's
nuclear facilities provoke a popular uprising. Every single political
faction sup****ts the nuclear program out of patriotic pride.
There is surely a glaring paradox here. The regime may be wildly
unpopular - because of so much enforced austerity in an energy-rich
land and the virtual absence of social mobility - but for millions,
especially in the countryside and the remote provinces, life is still
bearable. In the large urban centers - Tehran, Isfahan, ****raz and
Tabriz - most would be in favor of a move toward a more market-
oriented economy combined with a progressive liberalization of mores
(even as the regime insists on going the other way). No velvet
revolution, however, seems to be on the horizon.
At least four main factions are at play in the intricate Persian-
miniature-like game of today's Iranian power politics - and two
others, the revolutionary left and the secular right, even though
thoroughly marginalized, shouldn't be forgotten either.
The extreme right, very religiously conservative but economically
socialist, has, from the beginning, been closely aligned with the
Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Ahmadinejad is the star of this faction.
The clerics, from the Supreme Leader to thousands of provincial
religious figures, are pure conservatives, even more patriotic than
the extreme right, yet generally no lovers of Ahmadinejad. But there
is a crucial internal split. The substantially wealthy bonyads - the
Islamic foundations, active in all economic sectors - badly want a
reconciliation with the West. They know that, under the pressure of
Western sanctions, the relentless flight of both capital and brains is
working against the national interest.
Economists in Tehran project there may be as much as US$600 billion in
Iranian funds invested in the economies of Persian Gulf petro-
monarchies. The best and the brightest continue to flee the country.
But the Islamic foundations also know that this state of affairs
slowly undermines Ahmadinejad's power.
The extremely influential IRGC, a key component of government with
vast economic interests, transits between these two factions. They
privilege the fight against what they define as Zionism, are in favor
of close relations with Sunni Arab states, and want to go all the way
with the nuclear program. In fact, substantial sections of the IRGC
and the Basij believe Iran must enter the nuclear club not only to
prevent an attack by the "American Satan" but to irreversibly change
the balance of power in the Middle East and Southwest Asia.
The current reformists/progressives of the left were originally former
partisans of Khomeini's son, Ahmad Khomeini. Later, after a
spectacular mutation from Soviet-style socialism to some sort of
religious democracy, their new icon became former president Mohammad
Khatami (of "dialogue of civilizations" fame). Here, after all, was an
Islamic president who had captured the youth vote and the women's vote
and had written about the ideas of German philosopher Jurgen Habermas
as applied to civil society as well as the possibility of
democratization in Iran. Unfortunately, his "Tehran Spring" didn't
last long - and is now long gone.
The key establishment faction is undoubtedly that of moderate Hashemi
Rafsanjani, a former two-term president, current chairman of the
Expediency Council and a key member of the Council of Experts - 86
clerics, no women, the Holy Grail of the system, and the only
institution in the Islamic Republic capable of removing the Supreme
Leader from office. He is now sup****ted by the intelligentsia and
urban youth. Colloquially known as "The Shark", Rafsanjani is the
consummate Machiavellian. He retains privileged ties to key Wa****ngton
players and has proven to be the ultimate survivor - moving like a
skilled juggler between Khatami and Khamenei as power in the country
****fted.
Rafsanjani is, and will always remain, a sup****ter of the Supreme
Leader. As the regime's de facto number two, his quest is not only to
"save" the Islamic Revolution of 1979 but also to consolidate Iran's
regional power and reconcile the country with the West. His reasoning
is clear: he knows that an anti-Islamic tempest is already brewing
among the young in Iran's major cities, who dream of integrating with
the nomad elites of liquid global modernity.
If the Bush administration had any real desire to let its aircraft
carriers float out of the Gulf and establish an entente cordiale with
Tehran, Rafsanjani would be the man to talk to.
5. Heading down the New Silk Road. Reformist friends in Tehran keep
telling me the country is now immersed in an atmosphere similar to the
Cultural Revolution of the 1960s in China or the 1980s rectification
campaign in Cuba - and nothing "velvet" or "orange" or "tulip" or any
of the other color-coded Western-style movements that Wa****ngton might
dream of is, as yet, on the horizon.
Under such conditions, what if there were an American air attack on
Iran? The Supreme Leader, on the record, offered his own version of
threats in 2006. If Iran were attacked, he said, the retaliation would
be doubly powerful against US interests elsewhere in the world.
=46rom American supply lines and bases in southern Iraq to the Strait of
Hormuz, the Iranians, though no military powerhouse, do have the
ability to cause real damage to American forces and interests - and
certainly to drive the price of oil into the stratosphere. Such a
"war" would clearly be a disaster for everyone.
The Iranian theocratic leader****p, however, seems to doubt that the
Bush administration and the US military, exhausted by their wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan, will attack. They feel a tide at their backs.
Meanwhile the "Look East" strategy, driven by soaring energy prices,
is bearing fruit.
Ahmadinejad has just concluded a tour of South Asia and, to the
despair of American neo-cons, the Asian energy security grid is
quickly becoming a reality. Two years ago, at the Petroleum Ministry
in Tehran, I was told Iran is betting on the total "interdependence of
Asia and Persian Gulf geo-economic politics".
This year, Iran finally becomes a natural gas-ex****ting country. The
framework for the $7.6 billion Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline, also
known as the "peace" pipeline, is a go. Both these key South Asian US
allies are ignoring Bush administration desires and rapidly bolstering
their economic, political, cultural, and - crucially - geostrategic
connections with Iran. An attack on Iran would now inevitably be
viewed as an attack against Asia.
What a disaster in the making, and yet, now more than ever, Cheney's
faction in Wa****ngton (not to mention possible future president John
McCain) seems ready to bomb. Perhaps the Mahdi himself - in his occult
wisdom - is betting on a US war against Asia to slouch towards Qom to
be reborn.
Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is
Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a
snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. He may be reached at
pepeasia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Copyright 2008 Pepe Escobar.)
SOURCE: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JE03Ak05.html
- o O o =96
Secret Bush "Finding" Widens War On Iran
Democrats Okay Funds for Covert Ops
By Andrew Cockburn,
Counterpunch,
2 May, 2008.
Six weeks ago, President Bush signed a secret finding authorizing a
covert offensive against the Iranian regime that, according to those
familiar with its contents, "unprecedented in its scope."
Bush=92s secret directive covers actions across a huge geographic area =96
from Lebanon to Afghanistan =96 but is also far more sweeping in the
type of actions permitted under its guidelines =96 up to and including
the assassination of targeted officials. This widened scope clears
the way, for example, for full sup****t for the military arm of
Mujahedin-e Khalq, the cultish Iranian opposition group, despite its
enduring position on the State Department's list of terrorist groups.
Similarly, covert funds can now flow without restriction to Jundullah,
or "army of god," the militant Sunni group in Iranian Baluchistan =96
just across the Afghan border -- whose leader was featured not long
ago on Dan Rather Re****ts cutting his brother in law's throat.
Other elements that will benefit from U.S. largesse and advice include
Iranian Kurdish nationalists, as well the Ahwazi arabs of south west
Iran. Further afield, operations against Iran's Hezbollah allies in
Lebanon will be stepped up, along with efforts to destabilize the
Syrian regime.
All this costs money, which in turn must be authorized by Congress, or
at least a by few witting members of the intelligence committees.
That has not proved a problem. An initial outlay of $300 million to
finance implementation of the finding has been swiftly approved with
bipartisan sup****t, apparently regardless of the unpopularity of the
current war and the perilous condition of the U.S. economy.
Until recently, the administration faced a serious obstacle to action
against Iran in the form of Centcom commander Admiral William Fallon,
who made no secret of his contempt for official determination to take
us to war. In a widely publicized incident last January, Iranian
patrol boats approached a U.S. ****p in what the Pentagon described as
a "taunting" manner. According to Centcom staff officers, the American
commander on the spot was about to open fire. At that point, the U.S.
was close to war. He desisted only when Fallon personally and
explicitly ordered him not to shoot. The White House, according to
the staff officers, was "absolutely furious" with Fallon for defusing
the incident.
Fallon has since departed. His abrupt resignation in early March
followed the publication of his unvarnished views on our policy of
confrontation with Iran, something that is unlikely to happen to his
replacement, George Bush's favorite general, David Petraeus.
Though Petraeus is not due to take formal command at Centcom until
late summer, there are abundant signs that something may happen
before then. A Marine amphibious force, originally due to leave San
Diego for the Persian Gulf in mid June, has had its sailing date
abruptly moved up to May 4. A scheduled meeting in Europe between
French diplomats acting as intermediaries for the U.S. and Iranian
representatives has been abruptly cancelled in the last two weeks.
Petraeus is said to be at work on a master briefing for congress to
demonstrate conclusively that the Iranians are the source of our
current troubles in Iraq, thanks to their sup****t for the ****a militia
currently under attack by U.S. forces in Baghdad.
Interestingly, despite the bellicose complaints, Petraeus has made
little effort to seal the Iran-Iraq border, and in any case two thirds
of U.S. casualties still come from Sunni insurgents. "The ****a
account for less than one third," a recently returned member of the
command staff in Baghdad familiar with the relevant intelligence told
me, "but if you want a war you have to sell it."
Even without the covert initiatives described above, the huge and
growing armada currently on station in the Gulf is an impressive
symbol of American power.
Armed Might of US Marred By Begging Bowl to Arabs
Sometime in the next two weeks, fleet radar operator may notice a blip
on their screens that represents something rather more profound:
America's growing financial weakness. The blip will be former Treasury
Secretary Robert Rubin's plane commencing its descent into Abu Dhabi.
Rubin's responsibility these days is to help keep Citigroup afloat
despite a balance sheet still waterlogged, despite frantic bail out
efforts by the Federal Reserve and others, by staggering losses in
mortgage bonds. The Abu Dhabi Sovereign Wealth Fund injected $7.5
billion last November (albeit at a sub-prime interest rate of eleven
percent,) but the bank's urgent need for fresh capital persists, and
Abu Dhabi is where the money is.
Even if those radar operators pay no attention to Mr. Rubin's flight,
and the ironic contrast it illustrates between American military power
and financial weakness, others will, and not just in Tehran. There's
not much a finding can do about that.
Andrew Cockburn is a regular CounterPunch contributor. He lives in
Wa****ngton DC. His most recent book is Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall and
Catastrophic Legacy.
SOURCE: http://www.counterpunch.org/andrew05022008.html
( These news items are posted here under =91Fair Use=92 provisions)
- o O o =96
=91Is War With Iran Imminent?=92- Justin Raimondo
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=3D12755
=91The Iraq War Morphs Into The Iranian War=92
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19839.htm
'Israel Preparing To Bomb Iran Nuclear Sites'
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=3D53558§ionid=3D351020104
'Joint Chiefs Chairman Says U.S. Preparing Military Options Against
Iran'
http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/25/AR2008042501=
480_pf.html
=91FEMA To Help Run 8-Day Disaster And Terror Drill Covering U.S. (And
Canada Command) In May=92
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=3D8679
See Also:
'Was April 20th The Original Date Of The Planned U.S. 'Air Strike' On
Iran?' http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/IRANPLAN.HTM
'Is A U.S./Israeli Air Strike On Iran Drawing Steadily Closer?' (News
Updates) http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/IRANWAR.HTM
- o O o =96
'Bush Was Prepared To Go Nuclear: Afghanistan Was To Have Been A NWO
Object Lesson!=92 http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NUCLEAR.HTM.
=91The Plan For Three World Wars=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/3WARS.HTM
'Astounding Quotes From The Political And Financial Elite On The
Planned New World Order' http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/TRAGEDY.HTM
Archived =91New World Order Intelligence Update=92 Articles on the =91New
World Order=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/sect22.htm
The Elite=92s Secretive Plan For A =91North American Union=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU1.HTM
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU2.HTM
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NAU3.HTM
'The 1935 U.S. War Plan For The Invasion Of Canada'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/USINVASN.HTM
'Canadian Troops To Police U.S. Cities During Martial Law;
U.S. Troops To Seize Strategic James Bay Hydro Plant If Quebec
Separates?'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CANTROOP.HTM
'The Grand Canal - The Elite's Continent-Reshaping, Climate-Altering
Water-Diversion Plan Will Turn Canadian Water Into 'Liquid Gold' From
James Bay To Mexico!'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/grand.htm
The Elite=92s =93Newstates=92 Constitution For The Coming =91United States
O=
f
North America=92
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/NEWSTATE.HTM
For related re****ts, see:
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/quebec.htm
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/drum.htm
- o O o =96
Bankrupt U.S.A. Covets Iran=92s Oil=85.
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDWN1.HTM
'Sorting Through The Rubble In Post-Bubble America'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDOWN.HTM
'The Coming U.S. Economic and Financial Meltdown'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDWN2.HTM
'The U.S. Economic and Financial Meltdown Accelerates'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MELTDWN3.HTM
'No End In Sight As U.S. Financial Crisis Deepens'
'Global Starvation - Coming Soon To Europe And North America, Too?'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/FOODLOSS.HTM
'The Coming Great Food Shortages In America' by Texe Marrs
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/TEXMARRS.HTM
=85And the likely response to an economic or financial crisis by =91El
Presidente=92 Bush?
George W. Bush: Constitution of the United States is just a "goddamned
piece of paper."
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_8534.shtml
'General Tommy Franks Says U.S. Constitution May Not Survive, Sees
Possible Military Form Of Government In The United States'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/FRANKS.HTM
'Concentration Camps in America? Martial Law Civilian Detention
Centers?'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CONCAMP.HTM
'Astoni****ng 1987 =91Miami Herald=92 News Re****t Reveals Existence Of A
'Secret Government', Plus Plans To Suspend Constitution, Impose
Martial Law, And Activate Civilian Detention Centers'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CONCAMP2.HTM
U.S. Congressman: American Concentration Camps "On The Books=94
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/CONCAMP3.HTM
'More Preparations For U.S. Martial Law'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/MOREMART.HTM
(Must reading!)
'FEMA: America's Secret Government-In-Waiting'
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/fema.htm
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/GEO443.HTM
'War Is A Racket' by Major General Smedley Butler, USMC
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/BLACK-OP.HTM
'Chemtrails: Are They For Climate Control, Weather Modification,
'Black Ops' Or For Biological Warfare And Mass Vaccine Testing?'
- o O o -
Visit our invaluable archive of Articles on the New World Order
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/sect22.htm
You'll find a wide range of free online Classic History books (on
English history, American History, Canadian History, European History,
Napoleonic History, Russian History, German History, Greek and Roman
History), plus the books of Jane Austen, at
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.co=
m/freehist.htm
For free online Classic Travel Books,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/freetrav.htm
For free online Classic Christian Books,
http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/SERMONS
- o O o -
NUCLEAR TREASON AT THE TOP OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT?
These serious allegations, involving the alleged =91sale=92 of nuclear
secrets, reach right to the top of the U.S. government. The
prestigious London =91Sunday Times=92 first broke this blockbuster story
on 6th January, 2008 =96 it has been completely =91blacked out=92 by the
U.S. media and wire services!
=93If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this
case, you will see very high-level people going through criminal
trials=94 =96 Sibel Edmonds
For news headline and blogger article links on the sensational =91U.S.
Nuclear Treason And Betrayal=92 revelations of Sibel Edmonds, the ex-FBI
whistleblower who has been called =91The most-gagged woman in America=92,
go to http://www.mimico-by-the-lake.com/EDMONDS.HTM
|
