On Apr 28, 8:42 pm, "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Ahmad" <othm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Apr 28, 7:46 pm, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 28, 11:56 am, achtung <ko...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> why you so
sure Anwar can do the job?
> > > He is equally corrupted with a record to prove
>
> > Corrupt ? Who is not corrupt ? Bush, Dr. M,
> > LHL.....?
>
> > As far as the poor Malays are concerned, Anwar
> > has a better image. He promised to change NEP,
> > promised to more efficient ...promise to listen
> > more....
>
> This is his most im****tant character. The ability to listen.
> I disagree with many of his ideas, but hopefully, the ability to
> listen to reasons will make him and understand.
>
> His ability to convince others is even more impressive. Imagine anyone
> who can make DAP and PAS work together. Anwar did it.
>
I am not sure how much Anwar can take credit for
this...getting DAP and PAS to form a united front
against BN.
I think, BN's mishandling of issues close to the
hearts of Chinese and Indians was an im****tant
factor that saw BN losing five states...and making
them realised that a united front could defeat BN
in the coming election.
For power, they have to push their difference to
the back burner.
> Abdullah promised to listen, but no action at all. Abdullah is almost
> devoid of any ability to do analysis, relying too much on his
> advisors.
No leaders can do everything by themselves...All good leader
have to rely on their generals to do things for them. He must
first get a team of able generals.
Pah Lah's problem was that he has NO good generals working
for him...he tried to do too many things by himself...and
he trusted his son in law too much. He is not an able leader.
|
