On May 3, 11:43 pm, "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Ahmad" <othm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Apr 29, 5:59 pm, Monster <dku04...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
xxx
>
> Even Singa****e follows this policy, except that they still follow the
> bonding scholar****ps very closely, even for foreigners. Singa****e
> gives loans but didn't request for repayment, only bonding, unlike
> Malaysia.
>
I think ..there is a great difference between scholar****p given
by Singa****e and educational loan given to Malays.
In Singa****e, scholar****ps are given ONLY to top students
who have no problem in obtaining their degrees in flying
colours even in top Ivy league universities
Educational loans are given to Malay students who may
failed their exams in 2nd tier universities in the US or UK.
Without a degree, they may not get good jobs... it is unfair
to expect them to repay their loans.
The loans should not have been granted in the first place...
Your comparison seen in this perspective is not sound.
>
>
>
> And please stop the lies that it was the Malays or
> Malaysians, who started these NEP policies.
Is it a lie?
Was it not the late Tun Razak who launched the NEP
in 1971, after the racial riot in 1969. The NEP give
Malays extra privileges in the form of quotas, in
employment and in share in companies....apart
from scholar****ps and free education.
>........ It was started by the British much much earlier ...
Yes. Under the colonial government, Malays were given
certain privileges over non-Malays.... but NEP is different
in scope and nature.
Singa****e still maintain this colonial privileges for Malays...
free education up to University level, and have enhanced
it by grants to help poor Malay families,..
If the colonial help for the Malays is regarded as NEP,
then is Singa****e having NEP also...to help the Malays
in Singa****e.
I am sure...you would dispute this point about NEP
for Singa****e Malays.
and much more efficiently. It is the Malays
> who abandoned NEP according to the original objective and replacing it
> with corruptions by awarding contracts to cronies by a much larger
> amount compared to educational assistances that are designed for the
> poor, instead of just the middle class.
|
