<javediqbalkaleem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> I would not respond to your ir-relevant talk. I am entitled to my
> opinions as you are to yours.
>
This forum has endured a lot of your asinine and puerile posts which
have every thing to do with your own agenda and very little to do
with Bangladesh's welfare.
By your spamming, you are trying to re-enact what went on between
1947 thru 1971. Anytime Banglade****s wanted a fair representation in
the government or a fair division of investments and development
money, they were told that Pakistan's ruling elite was doing
Bangladesh a favor by protecting them from evil India. Your posts are
a legacy of Pakistan's colonial attitude.
When Pakistan's Kakul trained thieves and their orderlies, in a
desperate attempt to retain Bangladesh as colony, resorted to
genocide and rape, wasn't it evil India who put an end to those
crimes? And Pakistan's men in uniform that had acted so brave while
massacring unarmed civilians and raping women, had no more bravery
left when India finally intervened. It was all over in just two weeks
as Pakistan's 90,000 brave soldiers chose to quickly surrender to the
Indian army lest they be incinerated by the anger of the Banglade****s.
Javed Iqbal Kaleem, you are a shameless Pakistani. You have blamed
the Bengalis in general and the "Awami League goons" in particular
for the crimes of 1971. You have the audacity to declare in a
Banglade**** forum that Banglade****s deserved to be the victims in
1971 because they had failed to vote for his party, the infamous
Jamaat-e-Islami. You go on to malign Bengalis by association by
claiming that traitors Mir Jafar and Iskandar Mirza were ****a
Bengalis!!
If it is that im****tant for Javed Iqbal Kaleem to compete with India,
why doesn't he choose an Afghani forum instead? How come the Indians
are regarded more favorably than neighboring Pakistanis in Afganistan?
Isn't the answer self-evident? It has everything to do with the greed
and dishonesty of Pakistan's men in uniform. Ghaddars Ayub Khan,
Yahya Khan, Ziaul Huq amd Pervez Musharraf were single-minded in
ensuring that the men in uniform remain the supreme arbiter in
Pakistan regarding who gets to steal and how much.
Isn't it revealing that after Israel, it is Egypt and Pakistan that
have received the maximum aid from America and its allies?
Ayub Khan and Yahya Khan used the threat of communism to milk the
Americans. But the Khans never had the guts to fight the Soviet or
the Chinese.
Ziaul Huq used the fear of the Soviet empire to milk the Americans
into pouring billions into the hands of the Pakistan army which, in
its turn, decided to disburse the money to only those that would
agree to be controlled by the ISI and the Pak military. But needless
to say, the bulk of the money always went to enrich Pakistan's men in
uniform.
Ziaul Huq's army didn't have the guts to fight the Indian army
either. It chose to fight a proxy war by recruiting foreign
terrorists and mercenaries and unlea****ng them on Kashmir, thereby
managing to lose all international sup****t for the cause of Kashmiris.
And now we have Pervez Musharraf who was so shameless that he refused
to even retrieve the bodies of Pakistanis and allied foreigners alike
after the ignominy of Kargil. And when Pervez Musharraf was told to
jump by a low level US official after 9/11, this redoubtable general
meekly enquired, "how high?".
Billions of dollars have been pouring into the hands of Pakistan's
men in uniform from the time of Ayub Khan through Pervez Musharraf.
What can ordinary Pakistanis show from this inflow? Absolutely
nothing.
Javed Iqbal Kaleem, if Pakistan is ranked below not just India but
even below Myanmar and Bhutan by UNDP, it is because Pakistan has
been systematically looted by pakistan's men in uniform who hail from
just a few districts ( mostly in Punjab but a few in Pashtunkhwa as
well).
What's the point in coming to a Banglade**** forum and trying to prove
that Pakistan has done better than India? Why should we in Bangladesh
care? As far as we are concerned, South Asia has a long way to go.
And we are simply amazed that in spite of the continuous inflow of
American money into the coffers of Pakistan's GHQ, the ordinary
Pakistanis are no better than the rest of South Asians.
Here's the 2007/2008 Human Development Index rankings for nations in
our neighborhood:
China 81
Iran 94
Sri Lanka 99
India 128
Myanmar 132
Bhutan 133
Pakistan 136
Bangladesh 140
Nepal 142
BTW, for nearly a quarter of century, Pakistan had used India as a
scarecrow to continue as Bangladesh's colonial master. But we have
now been independent for nearly 4 decades. We can preserve our
independence on our own. You have a hangover from Pakistan's colonial
legacy if you think that you can advance Pakistan's agenda by scaring
Bangladesh with the same scarecrow that was used during the colonial
era of 1947-1971.
If Pakistan wants to compete with India, let it do in neighboring
Afghanistan where, as of now, India enjoys a far better image than
Pakistan. Afghanistan's top leaders have preferred to hobnob with
Hindu India than with Muslim Pakistan. Why? Because they know that
Pakistan's men in uniform have a history of using evil Hindus or evil
Communists as scarecrows merely to milk the gullible and to keep the
ordinary Pakistanis under military yoke. Pakistan's men in khaki have
milked compatriots and foreigners alike - so much so that Pakistan's
military men have emerged as the neo-feudals of the country that
remains the most feudal in South Asia to this day.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khabor/message/11590
|
