Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Development...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 48 of 366 Topic 45626 of 53285
Post > Topic >>

Re: Development Race: China and India

by pg <penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 07:25 PM

On May 7, 9:12 am, RichAsianKid <richasian...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


Let's use common sense when we compare the chinks with the dots, okay?

Chinks are fakers and copiers. Chinks can not think out of the box. In
fact, Chinks prefer to box themselves in (look at chinatown all over
the world and you know what I mean)

Chinks can not innovate. Chinks have all the 5,000 years of burden to
carry, that "Con****ius" burden alone has destroyed millions of Chinks'
outlook in life.

Dots, on the other hand, prefer to see beyond the horizon. Yes, you
can say that they are dreamers, but the Dots are more than MERE
DREAMING, they are working towards their dream.

Dots prefer to think OUT of the box. They innovate, they focus on
inventing things for the future.

While the Dots have also a long, long history, they refused to be
burdened by it. True, the Dots have a caste system. While others may
see it as a hindrance, I see it as a boost.

A caste system effectively preventing those low IQ people from getting
more than their fair share of what a society can give them.

The caste system in India is actually the opposite of the Affirmative
Action of the USA. In USA, you have low IQ blacks getting into Harvard
and Princeton and UCLA and MIT, just because they are black, and
nothing else.

The actual working of caste system in India (if the Indian government
don't **** it up) is that those low IQ tribe WILL NEVER BE ALLOWED to
abuse the meritocratic operation of the human hierarchy ... In other
word, if you are stupid, stay stupid and don't come into the smart
world.

Cruel? You bet ! But all of us live in a cruel world.

Utopia isn't reality. The "utopian" political correct world that many
US bleeding hearts believe in is actually killing the US of A. You
im****t tons and tons of useless idiots into your country, and they
keep on producing even more little useless idiots. You end up in a
situation whereby the SMART MINORITY has to work VERY HARD to feed the
STUPID M***** !!!

If that is not bad enough, you guys promote the STUPID to become
judge. Still remember that black judge who sue the Korean laundry for
tens of millions? Who the **** that nigger think he is?? How the ****
that nigger becomes a judge, in the first place???

Ask yourself the above questions and you know why your country, the US
of A, is sinking.

Back to the Chinks and the Dots.

The Chinks are egalitarian in nature --- in other words, Chinks are
more like the bleeding heart liberals of the USA. They believe that
through hard work, everyone should be enjoying the equal share of the
society.

That is why SMART Chinks work doubly hard to help their STUPID
cousins. Smart Chinks should have been putting their time and effort
into making themselves EVEN SMARTER ... but the damn 5,000 years of
burden made them think otherwise.

For Chink, if they do not help their stupid cousins, they would have
that "I'm a bad guy" conscience weighting down on them. So they put
their best to help out their stupid cousins.

In doing so, the SMART Chinks are not smart anymore. They wasted their
precious life in helping those who ought to have died much earlier,
due to their own stupidity, in the first place.

On the other hand, the SMART Dots don't have that burden on them. They
just let their idiot cousins die on the the road side, which is, in
the real world sense, FAIR.

You go see the animals in Savannah. Do you see healthy wilderbeast
trying to help the sick wilderbeast, and ended up being killed
themselves???

Of course NOT !!! Law of the nature is fixed --- that if you are
stupid, if you are weak, if you are sick, YOU ARE GONE !!!

But Human Beings thought that they are no longer animal. (Are they
trees???) They think that they have to help the weak, the poor, the
sick, the IDIOTS. Sure, helping all those asshole and you end up dead
yourself.

That is why the Dots have it in the right place. They just leave those
who are to be gone, gone at their own pace. The Smart Dots put all
their time and effort to MAKE THEMSELVES BETTER.

Which in itself a good thing.

Why? Because if the SMART PEOPLE BETTER THEMSELVES, they become even
Smarter. And a country as large as India, with burdgeoning population
(soon to surpass that of China), need TRULY, TRULY SMART PEOPLE to
chart its future.

China, on the other hand, is being ruled by a bunch of idiotic
mother****ers. Mother****ers who think they can rule the world by
hosting the stupid Olympics.

Now, China is ahead of India. China is ahead because of the SMART
Chinese living OUTSIDE of China went back to help their IDIOT cousins
left behind.

But SMART Chinese are limited in number. As soon as those SMART
Chinese ran out of their resources, their idiotic cousins took over.
When their idiotic Chinese start to chart the course for China, you'll
see that China will NOT go forward anymore.

In fact, it will go back, back, and BACK !!!

The hosting of the Olympics is but the FIRST SIGN of China going
backward. They wasted so much of their time, efforts, and resources to
host that stupid game.

The time, efforts and resources that could have been used to make
China even better.

But no. Them idiotic Chinks think otherwise. They think they can rule
the damn ****ing world by hosting the Olympics.

So what do you get? Red flags flying all over. For what the ****???

What has that to do with making China better? NOTHING !!!!

India, on the other hand, do no such thing. They knew better than to
host that stupid Olympic. Instead, they use their limited resources
into building MORE universities, training MORE of their smart people
to be even MORE smart, helping MORE of their people to compete MORE
efficiently in the world, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

Do you see Indian flags flying all over the world? No. Why not?
Because that ain't gonna help India a bit.

Unlike the stupid Chinks, the Dots understand that to TRULY BE NUMBER
1, they have to work doubly hard. They have to have THE NUMBER 1 HUMAN
RESOURCES to invent things, to innovate, to be technologically
SUPERIOR !!!

So the Dots are investing all they have to ensure that they will excel
in technology, that they have to be ahead of the USA, JAPAN and
EUROPE, in the technological fields.

The Dots are doing this, while we speak. In the meantime, the Chinks
are still waving their red-flags.

Perhaps you and I could never live to see the world where the Dots are
in front of the Chinks, but one day, maybe your children and my
children will see that.

I'm a Chink myself, and I'm telling you all these not because I'm
ashame of my own people. I'm telling you these because I am FULLY
AWARE of the UTTER STUPIDITY of my own people.

In conclusion,

The product of Chinks are visible --- goods in boxes.

The product of Dots are invisible --- strength, ideas, intellectual
properties.

Which product is better, my friend??
 




 366 Posts in Topic:
Development Race: China and India
PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-05 03:10:01 
Re: Development Race: China and India
PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-05 03:12:46 
Re: Development Race: China and India
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-04 20:46:29 
Re: Development Race: China and India
koki <guzhengqiu@[EMAI  2008-05-18 04:43:46 
Re: Development Race: China and India
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-18 09:19:32 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-18 09:36:02 
Re: Development Race: China and India
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-18 09:46:06 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-05 01:26:28 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 02:23:50 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 07:57:29 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-14 01:29:22 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 21:51:01 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Wakalukong <wakalukong  2008-05-05 20:17:52 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-06 13:46:27 
Re: Development Race: China and India
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-05 20:28:57 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 20:37:36 
Re: Development Race: China and India
"bikini" <bi  2008-05-06 13:09:07 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-05 22:34:24 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-18 01:29:54 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:39 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-05 22:38:20 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 07:33:24 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-13 18:17:24 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 22:49:07 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:36 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 23:23:02 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-14 16:35:14 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 23:39:36 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Wakalukong <wakalukong  2008-05-05 23:51:00 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Wakalukong <wakalukong  2008-05-05 23:52:32 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 23:56:56 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-06 16:13:32 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-06 00:49:51 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-06 04:44:19 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-07 09:12:59 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-14 16:51:18 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-19 11:07:18 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-07 09:19:34 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-07 09:28:25 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 13:37:15 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-18 01:59:25 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 15:58:08 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-18 09:38:14 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-19 17:53:37 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-07 09:38:29 
Affirmative Action in the US
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-07 09:46:00 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 18:48:08 
Re: Development Race: China and India
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 19:25:10 
Re: Development Race: China and India
PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-08 08:20:29 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-19 17:46:16 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-08 15:40:11 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-19 18:23:43 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-08 15:44:12 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-08 18:26:41 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 19:13:42 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 19:24:15 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-10 09:39:03 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-10 16:44:01 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-10 17:07:18 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-10 17:15:18 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 12:37:44 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 09:40:40 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-19 17:28:45 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-10 19:12:20 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-11 11:52:57 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:52 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-12 03:04:44 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-12 03:13:09 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-12 16:54:46 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 09:40:41 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 08:57:19 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 22:01:52 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-12 18:55:24 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-12 18:58:42 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 14:12:35 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-12 19:03:57 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-12 20:07:23 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-13 18:30:12 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:34 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:35 
Re: Development Race: China and India - RichAsianKid replies
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-13 18:41:28 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-18 02:01:46 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:38 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-18 09:31:54 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-18 09:38:27 
Re: Development Race: China and India
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-18 09:49:17 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-18 10:05:29 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-18 10:47:14 
Re: Development Race: China and India
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-18 11:12:51 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-19 10:52:31 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-19 17:34:51 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-20 15:26:54 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-20 15:26:52 
Junk Science in non-science media
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-19 17:50:40 
Taiwanese are Chinese.
baldeagle <botakeagle@  2008-05-19 18:02:29 
Re: Taiwanese are Chinese.
achtung <konon@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 18:12:59 
Re: Taiwanese are Chinese.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-20 15:26:55 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-19 18:27:29 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-20 15:26:56 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-20 00:50:43 
Re: Taiwanese are Chinese.
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-20 00:57:31 
Re: Junk Science in non-science media
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-20 18:47:40 
Re: Junk Science in non-science media
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-20 22:04:08 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 00:16:20 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-21 20:18:06 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-21 20:18:05 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-21 20:18:04 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 01:00:27 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-21 20:18:07 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 01:02:24 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-21 20:18:03 
PISA Scores and IQ
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 02:43:44 
Re: PISA Scores and IQ
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 03:01:07 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-21 12:34:35 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-21 12:35:01 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-21 12:39:20 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-21 12:47:29 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-21 13:01:06 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 14:22:50 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-22 13:17:41 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 14:25:01 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-22 13:17:37 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 14:27:03 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-22 13:17:38 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 14:27:35 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-22 13:17:42 
A note on Rushton & Gould
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-21 14:38:03 
Re: A note on Rushton & Gould
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-22 13:17:39 
Re: PISA Scores and IQ
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-22 01:37:59 
Re: PISA Scores and IQ
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-22 11:25:29 
Re: PISA Scores and IQ
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-23 12:24:24 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-23 12:33:54 
Re: A note on Rushton & Gould
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-23 14:02:13 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-23 14:25:39 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:23 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:24 
Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-23 14:58:09 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:16 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:18 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:19 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:21 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-23 15:02:39 
Re: PISA Scores and IQ
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-23 15:30:56 
Re: PISA Scores and IQ
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-24 16:21:52 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-25 09:58:03 
Re: Development Race: China and India
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-25 10:05:48 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-25 17:15:18 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-26 16:24:22 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-25 17:28:53 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-26 16:24:19 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-25 17:35:00 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-26 16:24:18 
Jim Walsh Concedes There Are Differences
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-25 17:39:18 
Re: Jim Walsh Concedes There Are Differences
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-26 16:24:23 
Re: Jim Walsh Concedes There Are Differences
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-26 16:24:24 
Re: Development Race: China and India
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-25 17:52:49 
Re: Development Race: China and India
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-26 16:24:25 
Re: PISA Scores and IQ
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-25 18:27:10 
A Filipino Maid's Son Poem...
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-25 21:56:55 
Re: A Filipino Maid's Son Poem...
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-26 16:24:20 
The Miserable State of Negro Education
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-26 00:23:20 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-26 16:08:20 
Re: Jim Walsh Concedes There Are Differences
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-26 16:42:14 
Re: Jim Walsh Concedes There Are Differences
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-26 16:48:19 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-26 17:38:34 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-27 13:51:38 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-26 17:54:18 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-27 13:51:31 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-27 13:51:36 
Re: Jim Walsh Concedes There Are Differences
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-26 18:03:07 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-26 18:29:46 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-27 13:51:37 
Re: A Filipino Maid's Son Poem...
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-26 18:31:45 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-27 15:24:51 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-28 21:17:49 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-27 15:28:13 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-28 21:17:46 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-27 15:31:17 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-28 21:17:40 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-27 15:36:04 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-28 21:17:44 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-27 15:37:33 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-28 21:17:47 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-27 15:40:52 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-27 15:54:15 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-28 21:17:43 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-28 13:44:51 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-28 14:07:43 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-28 14:33:14 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-28 16:42:10 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:34:56 
MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black Differ
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-28 22:33:14 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black Di
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:19:26 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black Di
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:34:55 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-28 22:40:12 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:34:59 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:35:00 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:35:01 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-28 22:44:35 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:34:57 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-28 22:56:24 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:34:52 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 14:34:53 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-28 23:12:04 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 23:58:22 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 23:58:24 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 23:58:25 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-28 23:15:48 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-29 23:58:21 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-29 09:28:33 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-30 01:34:53 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-29 17:53:55 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-29 18:10:42 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-29 18:34:42 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-29 19:50:29 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-29 20:01:28 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-30 12:02:58 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-30 12:10:10 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-30 12:25:42 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-30 16:00:00 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-01 18:04:30 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-30 16:00:30 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-30 16:01:29 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-01 18:04:35 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-30 16:07:20 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-01 18:04:33 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-30 16:14:13 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-01 18:04:31 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-30 16:22:49 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-01 18:04:32 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-30 16:31:40 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-01 18:04:26 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-30 18:10:10 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-31 00:25:01 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-05-31 00:35:47 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-31 10:30:07 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-31 15:19:01 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-31 15:28:10 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-31 15:41:24 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-05-31 19:02:40 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-01 01:09:55 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-01 13:37:22 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-01 13:48:34 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-01 14:02:06 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-01 15:54:43 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-01 17:11:35 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-01 17:20:46 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-02 17:32:48 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-02 17:38:18 
Re: Jim Walsh Failed Stats?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-03 14:12:55 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-02 17:44:24 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-02 17:45:44 
Pride goes before a fall
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-03 14:12:54 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-02 17:50:31 
I Love everyone, the best I can.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-03 14:12:49 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-02 18:01:50 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-03 14:12:52 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-03 14:07:50 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-03 14:18:06 
Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family More
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-04 21:55:15 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-05 13:52:58 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-04 22:03:02 
Get Real
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-05 13:52:56 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-05 13:52:57 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-04 22:14:19 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-04 22:20:58 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-05 13:52:55 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-04 22:38:01 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-05 08:15:20 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-05 08:37:01 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-05 09:14:31 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-05 09:19:21 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-05 09:27:25 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 00:49:32 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 17:15:18 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 17:15:17 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 17:15:19 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 00:51:44 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 17:15:10 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 01:04:13 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 17:15:15 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 02:26:59 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 18:10:15 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 02:28:15 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 18:09:52 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 02:30:08 
RAK is a silly boy, isn't he.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 18:10:29 
Wow, Japan impresses me
bear@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-06-08 08:23:34 
Haha, Jim Walsh on Stage
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 02:31:56 
Re: Haha, Jim Walsh on Stage
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-07 18:10:21 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
israeliteknight <israe  2008-06-07 15:37:28 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 23:46:10 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-08 15:55:45 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 23:50:32 
Re: Haha, Jim Walsh on Stage
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 23:53:30 
Re: Haha, Jim Walsh on Stage
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-08 15:55:42 
Re: RAK is a silly boy, isn't he.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 23:53:46 
Re: RAK is a silly boy, isn't he.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-08 15:55:44 
Re: Seeking Confirmation: Jim Walsh Does Not Love His Family Mor
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-07 23:54:35 
Zimbabwe, South Africa, Liberalism etc....
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 00:16:36 
Re: Jim Walsh's BIG Lie re: Cavalli-Sforza
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 00:27:03 
A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-08 15:55:58 
The Latest on Zimbabwe!
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 00:33:20 
Re: Zimbabwe, South Africa, Liberalism etc....
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 00:45:59 
Re: Zimbabwe, South Africa, Liberalism etc....
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-08 16:00:43 
Re: Haha, Jim Walsh on Stage
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:11:30 
Re: Haha, Jim Walsh on Stage
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:34:01 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:22:00 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:34:04 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:34:03 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:32:24 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:41:12 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:51:47 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:41:16 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:41:13 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:41:15 
Re: Wow, Japan impresses me
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:43:36 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-06-08 19:49:43 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 10:54:25 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:53:13 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 11:02:15 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:55:57 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 11:11:27 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:57:38 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 11:10:39 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:58:43 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 11:11:24 
Re: Haha, Jim Walsh on Stage
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 19:59:24 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 20:04:36 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 11:17:35 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-06-08 20:06:47 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 11:17:38 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 20:08:26 
Re: MUST READ: Jim Walsh's BIGGEST Lie re: Gould, White/Black
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 11:17:39 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 20:18:51 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 20:30:17 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 13:17:38 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-08 20:35:06 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-09 13:17:39 
Question: Has Jim Walsh Visited Sichuan Yet If He Does Not Love
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-10 00:12:05 
Question: Has Jim Walsh Visited Sichuan Yet If He Does Not Love
RichAsianKid <richasia  2008-06-10 00:12:23 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
"abianchen@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-10 00:47:53 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-06-10 23:00:21 
RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet exce
"abianchen@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-10 00:51:33 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-06-10 07:47:29 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
"abianchen@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-10 08:02:38 
Re: A new beginning, disproving the existence of races.
"abianchen@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-10 08:08:11 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-06-10 08:13:19 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
"abianchen@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-10 08:43:37 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-06-10 08:57:30 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
"abianchen@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-10 09:08:04 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-06-10 09:56:20 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
"abianchen@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-10 11:32:22 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-06-10 11:51:19 
Re: RAK, has you told Jim Walsh your true ethnic background yet<