On May 8, 9:58=A0am, Javed Iqbal Kaleem <JavedIqbalKal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On May 8, 4:20 am, nkdatta2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 7, 3:53 pm, Tambi Dude <tambid...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > You are traitor of Muslim Ummah and =A0Bangladesh . You are
licking =
toes
> > > > of Indians who are bent upon killing Banglade****s daily. By
blocking=
> > > > water of Banglade****
> > > > rivers, they want to starve you. But as a shameless beggar you are
> > > > licking their toes. =A0I do not care for such conscienceless
persons=
..
>
> > > > Javed Iqbal
>
> > Punjab has been depriving Sindh of water for a long time. Pakistan
> > wants to make new and large Dams and canals for retired army officials
> > on Indus river. Kalabagh dam & Greater Thal canal are good examples.
> > There is a petition on line that can be signed to protest the
> > injustice to Sindh.
>
> > Go to:http://www.petitiononline.com/sindhu/petition.html
>
> > Here's the petition:
>
> > Stop illegal constructions of Kalabagh dam & Greater Thal canal
>
> > To: =A0World Bank, Asian Bank & UNO
>
> > Pakistan wants to make new and large Dams and canals for retired army
> > officials on Indus river. Due to atrocities of province of Punjab now
> > Sindh is facing deadly shortage of water. In fact Punjab theft the
> > water of Sindh continously through centuries. In 1945 an accord was
> > made in the period of Birtish rule. Now Punjab doing human rights and
> > accord violations and making forcibly with the help of army, more
> > large Dams and Canals on Indus river. "The term 'historic share' of
> > water has no history. This term has never been used even in the
> > context of the 1991 Water Accord. However, when the deliberations on
> > the Water Accord were going on in 1991, the ap****tionment of water
> > between Punjab and Sindh had to be decided. The committee decided to
> > take the average of water ap****tioned between Punjab and Sindh from
> > 1977 to 1982 for the sake of an exercise just to determine the amount
> > required to be ap****tioned. But irrigation officials of the Punjab
> > regarded it as their 'historic share' of water. According to the
> > calculation of the so-called 'historic' right on water, the Punjab was
> > awarded 48 MAF while Sindh got 46 MAF. But, when the 1991 Water Accord
> > was finalised, Sindh was awarded 48.76 MAF of water. It is besides the
> > point that the Punjab got a greater quantity of water in the accord,
> > 55.94 MAF (almost 56 MAP.) Even then, the Punjab was not happy to see
> > that as per the 1991 Water Accord, Sindh was drawing more water than
> > the Punjab had been consuming during the years 1977 to 1982, i.e., 48
> > MAF. Basing the distribution of waters on the 'averages' of
> > exaggerated flow of the Sindhu Darya, was bound to lead to a major
> > confrontation between the upper and lower riparian. The waters flowing
> > down the Sindhu vacillates between 104 MAF and 80 MAF. How can
> > ap****tionment be based on the average of such a wide difference in
> > real flows. Surely, water ap****tionment depends on need. As the Sindhu
> > Darya is the only source of water for Sindh, this province must be
> > given its actual share specially during times of severe shortages.
>
> > The Punjab, during the downswing of the cycle, has complete control of
> > the waters in the Jhelum and Chenab rivers. In addition, the upper
> > riparian have sweet ground water reserves of 300 MAF which they can
> > draw on in times of shortages. Taking this reality into account, the
> > 1945 Sindh-Punjab water agreement gave 75 per cent of the Darya's
> > waters to Sindh. The Punjab, through its infamous link canals, could
> > only draw water from the Sindhu during the peak flood season. That is
> > all. Last year, during Nawaz Sharif's chauvinist rule, his province
> > unilaterally opened the link canals in late May - early June which
> > negatively affected agricultural output income in Sindh. This should
> > have given the upper riparians enough sense to see the logic in
> > the1945 Water Agreement. But, then, theft based on greed has its own
> > perverted logic, which if repeated often enough will be believed.(By:
> > Anwar Pirzado)
> > The quantity of even 10 maf provisionally allocated under the accord
> > is available only for 24 out of 72 years as calculated under the
> > title, 'Kharif availability'. Thus it is clear that the required
> > quantity of water for the substance of the environment cannot become
> > available under the cir***stances. It is not possible that this
> > position can be improved by denying the allocations/commitments of the
> > operational projects or by leaving the storages unfilled. However, it
> > is im****tant that at least further deterioration in the ecological
> > conditions must be prevented. The best that can be done to save the
> > environment from complete devastation is to plan future projects so
> > that the minimum required discharge of 300,000 cusecs is available for
> > outflow to sea at least for as much time as it is available, after
> > meeting the current Kharif demand. (By: Zulfiqar Halepoto)
>
> > Pakistan grows around 18 million tons of wheat per year and im****ts
> > roughly 2 million tons. The average yield per acre is 0.81 tons
> > against 0.97 tons in neighbouring India and 0.87 tons for the world.
> > So is it for each and every crop in Pakistan. A few administrative
> > steps like streamlining the supply of quality seed at proper time;
> > sparing a pittance for research on improved seeds in our excellent
> > agricultural universities; eliminating the use of spurious pesticides,
> > making fertilizers available at affordable rates and mounting a
> > dedicated training campaign for our Haris in the proper use of
> > pesticides and fertilizers, could increase the yield per acre, while
> > costing only a fraction of the Rs. 500 billion needed for the Kalabagh
> > dam. And this is only the empirical side. The effect on our agrarian
> > society and agricultural economy when all these concerted inputs are
> > applied at the designated sectors will be tremendous. Of the 105 MAF
> > at present made available at the canal heads an estimated 60% is lost
> > through eva****ation and seepage as follows: 15 MAF is lost in major
> > river beds, 10 MAF in canals and minors, 10 MAF in watercourses and 25
> > MAF on farms. (By: Abrar Kazi)"
>
> > We strongly appeal to World bank, Asian bank & UNO, help us to stop
> > atrocities and violations of accord of 1945 from the side of Punjab.
> > If kalabagh dam and Greater Thal canal will be build, Sindh province
> > will be in danger, due to destruction of Indus delta and deadly
> > shortage of water.
>
> > To sign the petition,
visit:http://www.petitiononline.com/sindhu/petitio=
n-sign.html?
>
> > > That's all a true muslim is capable of. Declare other muslim as a
> > > traitor
> > > and if possible behead him. No wonder Javed told me that he hates
> > > Irfan Hussain of Dawm, Reza Azmi, Pervez Hoodhboy etc.
>
> > > Why would India block Bangladesh water. If we had to do it we would
> > > done to Pakistan. Remember all Pak rivers start from Indian kashmir.
> > > Kahani khatam. Pakistan over.
> > > I wish we do that. pakistan can go to seventh century arab days when
> > > they use to clean their ass by stones.
>
> These are a few mis-guided elements who do get rejected in polls.
> Pakistan will soon construct a large dam to store its huge water
> resources and produce electricity.
>
> Javed Iqbal Kaleem- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
There is no provision for that in the Indus river water treaty,you
build a dam downstream,or divert,the source will get cut off by
India,THE ORIGIN OF ALL RIVERS FLOWING INTO PAKISTAN IS REGULATED IN
INDIA,Pakistan is a downstream country,like everything else which has
to do with India Pakistan issues,you are always in the down
position.Indians are on the top.
|
