ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 8, 9:55 am, "OD" <Ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>> On May 8, 9:38 am, "OD" <Ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>
http://news.xinhuanet.com/s****ts/2008-05/08/xinsrc_242050508120698411...
>>
>>>>> Sometimes ago, the headline of the Xinhua news is something like
>>>>> old China civilization meeting ancient western tradition of
>>>>> Olympic games. The meeting had been accomplished at the top of
>>>>> the world. China has accepted the west. Does the west accept
>>>>> China?
>>
>>>> If something as simple as China hosting the Olympic games means
>>>> China accepted the West, then I suppose that the Olympic games
>>>> choosing China to host the Olympics means the West accepts China.
>>>> At least by your own simple logic.
>>
>>> The Olympic committees certainly accept China. The Chinese people
>>> also wholeheartedly sup****t the Chinese government to host the 2008
>>> Beijing Olympic. But how about the west?
>>
>> Are any countries in "the West" keeping their athletes at home? No. I
>> guess that means they accept China. It's your logic.
>
> Can you be more specific on "It is your logic"?
You said China accepted the West based soley them hosting a s****ting event
and taking a torch up a mountain. If by that simple logic you can say
China
accepts the West then the West must accept China because it is going to
China to participate in the games.
|
