Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Is a 'Free ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 173 Topic 45960 of 48890
Post > Topic >>

Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

by "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 11, 2008 at 05:51 AM

On May 11, 8:44=A0am, Yu <yuga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 11, 3:40=A0pm, "Peter Webb"
>
>
>
>
>
> <webbfam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > <fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:f8afbbe9-e73b-456b-932b-69ffffcf3b4a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > The rallying cry "Free Tibet" can even be observed in the caps worn
by=

> > > the down-and-outs begging for nickles and dimes in the streets of
> > > Vancouver downtown. =A0I wonder how many of them are able to show
wher=
e
> > > Tibet is on map. =A0But let us see how possible (or probable) it is
fo=
r
> > > a 'Free Tibet' to materialize.
>
> > > There are 58 ethnic groups in China and the Tibetans are not even
the
> > > largest one. The attempt to restore a 'Free Tibet' in accordance
with
> > > the Dalai Lama's formula, which encomp***** about 1/4 of China's
> > > current territory, would mean having to walk over the dead bodies of
> > > the other 57 ethnic groups.
>
> > > "The Dalai Lama's stated aim is for Beijing to grant some kind of
> > > limited autonomy to Tibet......... has been that the new autonomous
> > > region would include so-called "greater" Tibet, that is, all the
> > > traditionally ethnic-Tibetan areas now parts of the provinces of
> > > Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu and Qinghai. In total, that would compromise
> > > around a quarter of China's current territory. No government in
> > > Beijing could ever contemplate such a giveaway, which would almost
> > > certainly unleash a nationalist backlash of frightening
pro****tions."
>
> > >http://en.chinaelections.org/newsinfo.asp?newsid=3D17363
>
> > That is an official Chinese Government website, and it provides no
> > substantiation for its claims..
>
> Here is a map showing territory claimed by the Dalai Lama, about 30%
> of China for 0.3% of China's current population.

It is like claining New York city to be part of Chin because there is
a Chinatown in New York and some Chinese in New York city want to be
Chines citizens.

> The map is prepared for the International Camapign for
Tibet.http://www.vw=
maps.com/tibetdetail.html- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 




 173 Posts in Topic:
Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 00:28:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-11 17:40:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-11 11:33:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 05:44:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-11 05:51:07 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"akenn100@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 07:50:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 08:18:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 08:20:11 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 08:36:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-11 15:49:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
aozotorp@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-11 12:04:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:44:26 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:45:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:52:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 11:51:06 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 13:51:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:12:36 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 21:18:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-11 21:29:47 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:19:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 04:44:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 05:27:20 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 05:37:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-11 22:46:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:16:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:21:35 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:59 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:33:32 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 15:29:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:31:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:57:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:35:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:52:03 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:36 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:22 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:40:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:53:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:44 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 07:50:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:54:39 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:40 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 07:55:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:57:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 08:19:42 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 08:22:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 02:04:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 02:10:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:26:24 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:29:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
aozotorp@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-12 03:10:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Polly the Parrot <flat  2008-05-12 20:17:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:46:20 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:13:47 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:50:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:53:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:55:25 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 05:01:08 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 05:36:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 06:00:54 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 06:23:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:18 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 06:25:34 
fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 08:17:00 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:29:33 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:34:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:34:54 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 08:39:52 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:49 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 08:41:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 09:02:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:06:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 09:40:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 09:04:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:20:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:23:10 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:34:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 09:41:34 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 17:26:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
taisun <taisun@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 11:44:54 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 12:45:49 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:23:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:04:31 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:25:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:26:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:03:32 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:27:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:36:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:02:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:59:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 17:21:12 
If CCP censor****p is so good, why not try it yourself.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:34:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:59 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"J.Venning" <  2008-05-13 09:53:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:38:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:40:00 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:45:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:51:04 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 19:19:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:48 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 17:21:35 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 22:47:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:18 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 23:54:07 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:20:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:31:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 22:24:39 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:34:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 17:51:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 18:56:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:04:24 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:05:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:12:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:15:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 02:11:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 14:21:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 18:33:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 18:38:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 19:32:13 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 05:18:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 06:45:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 20:46:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 06:49:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 01:34:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 20:46:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-16 00:45:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 01:49:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 02:05:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-15 23:29:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-15 07:53:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 09:48:40 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 09:50:28 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-16 12:51:00 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-16 22:30:12 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 00:55:17 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-05-17 01:15:46 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:34:20 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 11:50:10 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 14:14:39 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 15:40:13 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 21:10:14 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:43 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 17:27:08 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-17 01:13:23 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-16 21:53:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-16 23:27:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-19 21:02:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-17 14:25:10 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-17 07:35:03 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:44 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-18 01:10:01 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-18 21:38:02 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-24 21:25:39 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-24 14:34:59 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-24 16:54:07 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-24 15:30:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 16:32:01 CDT 2008.