Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Is a 'Free ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 15 of 173 Topic 45960 of 48166
Post > Topic >>

Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

by "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 11:51 AM

<fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:9c23c709-7d84-4df5-a9c0-f920bc3ecb5c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 May 11, 3:40 pm, "Peter Webb"
<webbfam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> <fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:f8afbbe9-e73b-456b-932b-69ffffcf3b4a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > The rallying cry "FreeTibet" can even be observed in the caps worn by
> > the down-and-outs begging for nickles and dimes in the streets of
> > Vancouver downtown. I wonder how many of them are able to show where
> >Tibetis on map. But let us see how possible (or probable) it is for
> > a 'FreeTibet' to materialize.
>
> > There are 58 ethnic groups in China and the Tibetans are not even the
> > largest one. The attempt to restore a 'FreeTibet' in accordance with
> > the Dalai Lama's formula, which encompasses about 1/4 of China's
> > current territory, would mean having to walk over the dead bodies of
> > the other 57 ethnic groups.
>
> > "The Dalai Lama's stated aim is for Beijing to grant some kind of
> > limited autonomy toTibet......... has been that the new autonomous
> > region would include so-called "greater"Tibet, that is, all the
> > traditionally ethnic-Tibetan areas now parts of the provinces of
> > Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu and Qinghai. In total, that would compromise
> > around a quarter of China's current territory. No government in
> > Beijing could ever contemplate such a giveaway, which would almost
> > certainly unleash a nationalist backlash of frightening pro****tions."
>
> >http://en.chinaelections.org/newsinfo.asp?newsid=17363
>
> That is an official Chinese Government website, and it provides no
> substantiation for its claims..
>
> > Territorial claims have to be practical to make any sense.
> > Vietnam and Mongolia proper were once parts of China for a millennia.
> > Korea used to rule northern China for a quite a while. Other examples
> > are the Manchus' rule over Manchuria, Uygurs had their empire for a
> > millennia too..Baikal Lake was called a Northern lake in China.
> > Tibetan empire was once so powerful that it ransacked Han capital
> > too. The whole human history has been the history of empires gobbling
> > up each in much the same way animals eat up each other in a jungle.
> > Dalai wants to go back to past history of hundreds if not thousands of
> > years and start from there. Well, many many years ago Tibetans might
> > not have been the original inhabitants ofTibeteither. The Nazis
> > went up to visit them in order to find out if they had been the
> > ancestors from the vani****ng island of Atlantas.
>
> > At this moment there are about 80K Tibetan exiles.
>
> The "freeTibet" movement is not solely for the purpose of Tibetan
exiles,
> Tibetans living inTibetmight like to be free as well.

Free from what?

****************
Occupation by the Chinese.


They used to be slaves in the time of high lamas.
*****************
So?


Now they are free not to be owned.  In terms of other kinds of
freedom, they don't suffer any more than any other groups in China.

*************
ROFL. So now China is the acceptable benchmark for human rights, and you 
don't consider it reasonable that some people may want more political 
freedom that is afforded to the Chinese people?



As a matter of fact, they are exempt from the one-child policy which
applies to other groups.  So what kind of freedom are you referring
to?

**************
Freedom to elect their own leaders. Freedom to set their own economic 
policies, including the freedom to mint their own currency and control 
foreign trade. Freedom of press, of association. There's more, but they 
would certainly be on my list of "freedoms" that I am referring to.



Do you know where Tibet is on the map?

***********
Actually, I have been there. Have you, now you are criticising my 
credentials?


>
> > Many of them are
> > the descendants of the former slave owners. Let them go to Canada or
> > USA for good since the latter's governments love them so much. For
> > these 80K Tibetans exiles to establish an autonomous region equal to
> > the size of 1/4 of China, they have to walk over the dead bodies of
> > the other 57 ethnic groups scattered everywhere.
>
> > Who would take the lead? Perhaps the down-and-outs in Canada, or
> > Europe...or the beach bums in Australia.. would do so. After all,
> > they don't have much to do anyway. Thus shouting some slogans while
> > being unable to point out whereTibetis on map should be a very good
> > Sunday pastime....
>
> Well, the only evidence you provide for anything you say is a Chinese
> Government web site.
>
> ROFL- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 




 173 Posts in Topic:
Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 00:28:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-11 17:40:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-11 11:33:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 05:44:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-11 05:51:07 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"akenn100@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 07:50:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 08:18:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 08:20:11 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 08:36:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-11 15:49:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
aozotorp@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-11 12:04:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:44:26 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:45:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:52:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 11:51:06 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 13:51:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:12:36 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 21:18:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-11 21:29:47 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:19:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 04:44:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 05:27:20 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 05:37:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-11 22:46:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:16:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:21:35 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:59 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:33:32 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 15:29:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:31:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:57:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:35:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:52:03 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:36 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:22 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:40:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:53:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:44 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 07:50:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:54:39 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:40 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 07:55:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:57:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 08:19:42 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 08:22:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 02:04:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 02:10:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:26:24 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:29:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
aozotorp@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-12 03:10:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Polly the Parrot <flat  2008-05-12 20:17:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:46:20 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:13:47 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:50:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:53:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:55:25 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 05:01:08 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 05:36:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 06:00:54 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 06:23:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:18 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 06:25:34 
fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 08:17:00 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:29:33 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:34:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:34:54 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 08:39:52 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:49 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 08:41:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 09:02:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:06:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 09:40:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 09:04:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:20:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:23:10 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:34:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 09:41:34 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 17:26:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
taisun <taisun@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 11:44:54 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 12:45:49 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:23:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:04:31 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:25:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:26:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:03:32 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:27:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:36:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:02:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:59:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 17:21:12 
If CCP censor****p is so good, why not try it yourself.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:34:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:59 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"J.Venning" <  2008-05-13 09:53:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:38:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:40:00 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:45:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:51:04 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 19:19:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:48 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 17:21:35 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 22:47:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:18 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 23:54:07 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:20:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:31:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 22:24:39 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:34:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 17:51:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 18:56:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:04:24 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:05:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:12:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:15:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 02:11:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 14:21:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 18:33:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 18:38:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 19:32:13 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 05:18:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 06:45:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 20:46:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 06:49:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 01:34:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 20:46:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-16 00:45:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 01:49:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 02:05:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-15 23:29:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-15 07:53:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 09:48:40 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 09:50:28 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-16 12:51:00 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-16 22:30:12 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 00:55:17 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-05-17 01:15:46 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:34:20 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 11:50:10 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 14:14:39 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 15:40:13 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 21:10:14 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:43 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 17:27:08 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-17 01:13:23 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-16 21:53:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-16 23:27:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-19 21:02:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-17 14:25:10 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-17 07:35:03 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:44 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-18 01:10:01 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-18 21:38:02 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-24 21:25:39 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-24 14:34:59 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-24 16:54:07 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-24 15:30:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 11:24:46 CDT 2008.