Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Is a 'Free ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 40 of 173 Topic 45960 of 48897
Post > Topic >>

Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

by "fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 12:40 AM

On 5=D4=C212=C8=D5, =CF=C2=CE=E73=CA=B129=B7=D6, Jim Walsh
<jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 15:28:53 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
> (in article
> <f8afbbe9-e73b-456b-932b-69ffffcf3...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>
>
> > The rallying cry "Free Tibet" can even be observed in the caps worn by
t=
he
> > down-and-outs begging for nickles and dimes in the streets of
Vancouver
> > downtown.  I wonder how many of them are able to show where Tibet is
on =
map.  
> > But let us see how possible (or probable) it is for a 'Free Tibet' to
> > materialize.
>
> Ok. First let the PRC become a democracy. Second, let the elected
> representatives of Tibet chat with the elected representatives of the
rest=
 of
> China, and work out their grievances.
>
> That would be a Free Tibet in my opinion.

This makes sense, but it is far away from being separation.  In order
for Tibet to be considered for separation, the Beijing government has
to ask the other 57 ethnic groups for their approval first, unless
they don't want to stay in power.

 >
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure
Usenet=
 News=3D=3D----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the
World=
! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=
=3D----
 




 173 Posts in Topic:
Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 00:28:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-11 17:40:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-11 11:33:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 05:44:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-11 05:51:07 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"akenn100@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 07:50:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
penang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 08:18:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 08:20:11 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 08:36:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-11 15:49:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
aozotorp@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-11 12:04:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:44:26 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:45:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 16:52:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 11:51:06 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 13:51:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:12:36 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 21:18:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-11 21:29:47 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:19:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 04:44:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 05:27:20 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 05:37:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-11 22:46:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:16:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:21:35 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:34:59 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-11 23:33:32 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 15:29:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:31:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:57:51 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:35:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:52:03 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:36 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:22 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:40:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-12 17:53:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:44 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 07:50:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:54:39 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:40 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 07:55:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:57:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 08:19:42 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 08:22:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 02:04:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 02:10:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:26:24 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 09:29:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
aozotorp@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-12 03:10:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Polly the Parrot <flat  2008-05-12 20:17:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:00:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:46:20 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:13:47 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:50:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:53:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 04:55:25 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 05:01:08 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 05:36:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 06:00:54 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 06:23:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:18 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 06:25:34 
fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 08:17:00 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:29:33 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:34:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:34:54 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 08:39:52 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:49 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 08:41:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 09:02:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:06:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 09:40:45 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 09:04:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:20:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:23:10 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 16:34:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 09:41:34 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-12 17:26:43 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
taisun <taisun@[EMAIL   2008-05-12 11:44:54 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 12:45:49 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:23:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:04:31 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:25:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:26:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:03:32 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:58 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:27:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 16:36:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 11:02:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 16:59:52 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 17:21:12 
If CCP censor****p is so good, why not try it yourself.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:34:50 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:59 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"J.Venning" <  2008-05-13 09:53:01 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:38:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:40:00 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:45:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 18:51:04 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-12 19:19:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:39:48 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-13 17:21:35 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 22:47:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:18 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 23:54:07 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 16:30:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:20:12 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:31:53 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 22:24:39 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 10:34:46 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 17:51:29 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 18:56:17 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:04:24 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:05:55 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:12:38 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 07:15:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 02:11:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-14 14:21:16 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 18:33:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 18:38:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 19:32:13 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 05:18:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 06:45:15 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 20:46:56 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-15 06:49:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 01:34:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 20:46:57 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-16 00:45:21 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 01:49:37 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 02:05:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-15 23:29:30 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-15 07:53:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 09:48:40 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-15 09:50:28 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-16 12:51:00 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-16 22:30:12 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 00:55:17 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
mimus <tinmimus99@[EMA  2008-05-17 01:15:46 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:34:20 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 11:50:10 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 14:14:39 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-17 15:40:13 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 21:10:14 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:43 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 17:27:08 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-17 01:13:23 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Keon <keon14@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-16 21:53:27 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-16 23:27:41 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
"OD" <Yahoo@  2008-05-19 21:02:19 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
netvegetable <none@[EM  2008-05-17 14:25:10 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-17 07:35:03 
Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 00:01:44 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-18 01:10:01 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"Peter Webb" &l  2008-05-18 21:38:02 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
Duncan Patton <campbel  2008-05-24 21:25:39 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-24 14:34:59 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
"SaPeIsMa" <  2008-05-24 16:54:07 
Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-24 15:30:19 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 4:04:12 CDT 2008.