Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:46:50 -0700, rst0wxyz wrote:

> On May 11, 10:27 pm, netvegetable <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 16:52:46 -0700, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> >> The "freeTibet" movement is not solely for the purpose of Tibetan
>> >> exiles, Tibetans living inTibetmight like to be free as well.
>>
>> > Free from what?  They used to be slaves in the time of high lamas.
>> > Now they are free not to be owned.  In terms of other kinds of
>> > freedom, they don't suffer any more than any other groups in China.
>> > As a matter of fact, they are exempt from the one-child policy which
>> > applies to other groups.  So what kind of freedom are you referring
>> > to?
>>
>> The freedom of self-determination would be a start. Right now, the PRC
>> is locking up people simply for saying "Free Tibet" in public.
> 
> 
> Too bad the PRC didn't lock you up.
> You should be locked up somewhere.

I am so sorry if I've offended you. I thought we were having lovely chats 
together.

-- 
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet

"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are 
conservatives."- John Stuart Mill