Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

On Mon, 12 May 2008 13:46:50 +0800, rst0wxyz wrote
(in article 
<02ddc7bc-b0c7-4cbd-b993-28d4f15b9c06@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> On May 11, 10:27 pm, netvegetable <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 16:52:46 -0700, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>> The "freeTibet" movement is not solely for the purpose of Tibetan
>>>> exiles, Tibetans living inTibetmight like to be free as well.
>> 
>>> Free from what?  They used to be slaves in the time of high lamas. Now
>>> they are free not to be owned.  In terms of other kinds of freedom,
they
>>> don't suffer any more than any other groups in China. As a matter of
>>> fact, they are exempt from the one-child policy which applies to other
>>> groups.  So what kind of freedom are you referring to?
>> 
>> The freedom of self-determination would be a start. Right now, the PRC
is
>> locking up people simply for saying "Free Tibet" in public.
> 
> 
> Too bad the PRC didn't lock you up.
> You should be locked up somewhere.

In other words, you sup****t the CCP's denial of human rights.

-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----