On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:51:04 +0800, PaPaPeng wrote
(in article <a91g24l0hf71vclrp79vnqh2b1q912shsp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 15:28:52 +0800, Jim Walsh
> <jimNOwalsSPAMh3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 03:57:04 +0800, PaPaPeng wrote
>> (in article <vpsb24tq03n7lunbnsp7tor7i2cnil7q69@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>>
>>>
>>> There is a lot more I can and wish to argue on that China has her own
form
>>> of
>>
>>> governance that worked well for her set of conditions.
>>
>> The existing form of governance ("obey the CCP") has not worked well
except
>> in gross terms of the economy, and that only for approximately half of
the
>> time.
>
> Beats being 3 trillion bucks in the hole in just seven Bush years.
Oh, there is plenty to criticize about the Bush administration, but the
problem is that one does not refute the other.
Had the Chinese people been in charge of their lives since1949, they would
likely have been much further ahead of their present condition.
--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
|
