Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

On May 12, 3:50=A0pm, netvegetable <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 23:16:51 -0700, Yu wrote:
> > On May 12, 1:37=A0pm, netvegetable <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 11 May 2008 08:36:55 -0700, Yu wrote:
> >> >> It is like claining New York city to be part of Chin because there
> >> >> is a Chinatown in New York and some Chinese in New York city want
to=

> >> >> be Chines citizens.
>
> >> > The NED is now sup****ting the Xinjiang separatists and more
recently
> >> > sup****ting South Mongolia separatists. South Mongolia is the name
for=

> >> > Inner Mongolia.
> >> > CIA's dream is take out 70% of China's land.
>
> >> Do you know it's a distinctive trait of third world, totalitarian
> >> ****holes, that they blame foreigners for almost all their problems?
>
> >> It's true. You'd think there was absolutely no problem Zimbabwe,
Burma,=

> >> or the PRC that can't be attributed to the CIA.
>
> > Read this declassified CIA do***ent and see how the CIA paid the Dalai
> > Lama US$180,000 a year for his service to the CIA.
> >http://www.intellnet.org/do***ents/700/040/744.html
>
> Nearly half a century ago I see. Long before Nixon went to visit Mao,
> back when Taipei was the recognized capital of China, and the PRC was
> behind what we called the "Iron Curtain".

It took them that long to partially declassify their files.
Today USA is even more neurotic about China.


> > Welcome if you have
> > any more question. Sure every country has problem, yet USA doesn't try
> > to help the Natives of USA and prefer to spent millions on Radio
> > FreeASia to incite violence in Tibet.
>
> I have a question. Whatever the CIA's alleged involvement, you don't
> think that shooting Tibetans, and locking them up for speaking their
> minds might also be contributing factor to the violence there?

> http://tinyurl.com/6gtm9e
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6zkq2o
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6fycff

I think these video are fake.
There have been lots of these fake video around.
When the alleged shooting occured you see the man fell to the ground
and people around him show no response at all they just go on walking.
The basic human instinct is to duck and cover.

> > What is you opinion about CIA's global activities?
>
> I think that back in the 60s, they were very active globally. Back then
> you got CIA activities like Operation Phoenix, where CIA went into
> foreign countries, and attempted to actively influence the politics
> there, by bribery, blackmail, and even assassinations.
>
> You will find that most of their operations in this period were
failures.
> They're really not very good at getting political outcomes.
>
> The reason they were active in the field then, is because this was
> shortly after America's "Red Scare", during which a lot of skilled
> diplomats from the US State Department had been marginalized as
> "communist sympathizers." Into the power vacuum strolled Allan Dulles
and
> CIA, offering to advice Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and
Nixon
> on how best to deal with foreign policy difficulties, mostly involving
> leaving it to them. So the CIA were free to have boy's own adventures,
> blunder around the planet killing people, and generally exacerbate the
> very problems they were being paid to solve.
>
> These days, ever since Richard Colby's admissions before Congress in the
> late 70s, CIA has been reigned in considerably. I suspect that they do
> still have active agents in the field, but the average CIA agent will be
> some sort of bespectacled analyst, at home in Wa****ngton. They may or
may
> not come up with reliable intel, but we saw in Iraq how this
intelligence
> is subject to an awful lot of political interference, depending on who
> it's being ac***ulated for. On that basis, I suspect they're mainly just
> another useless government department.

If u think CIA is still active which country is their biggest target
in the next 10 years?