Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

On May 12, 8:00=A0pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 15:40:37 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
> (in article
> <25b7b861-7683-4fac-b6f0-7f959f399...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>
>
> > This makes sense, but it is far away from being separation. =A0In
order =
for
> > Tibet to be considered for separation, the Beijing government has to
ask=
 the
> > other 57 ethnic groups for their approval first, unless they don't
want =
to
> > stay in power.
>
> nonsense. The issue of the organization of political structures does not
> depend on any such thing.

I wonder if we understand each other well enough.  Do you mean the
unelected government in Beijing could allow any province to go
independent at any time they want at will and do so without
repercussion in terms of public pressure?

I very much doubt.

>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure
Usenet=
 News=3D=3D----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the
World=
! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=
=3D----