Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

On May 12, 1:34=A0am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 13:46:50 +0800, rst0wxyz wrote
> (in article
> <02ddc7bc-b0c7-4cbd-b993-28d4f15b9...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 10:27=A0pm, netvegetable <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 11 May 2008 16:52:46 -0700, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>>> The "freeTibet" movement is not solely for the purpose of Tibetan
> >>>> exiles, Tibetans living inTibetmight like to be free as well.
>
> >>> Free from what? =A0They used to be slaves in the time of high lamas.
N=
ow
> >>> they are free not to be owned. =A0In terms of other kinds of
freedom, =
they
> >>> don't suffer any more than any other groups in China. As a matter of
> >>> fact, they are exempt from the one-child policy which applies to
other=

> >>> groups. =A0So what kind of freedom are you referring to?
>
> >> The freedom of self-determination would be a start. Right now, the
PRC =
is
> >> locking up people simply for saying "Free Tibet" in public.
>
> > Too bad the PRC didn't lock you up.
> > You should be locked up somewhere.
>
> In other words, you sup****t the CCP's denial of human rights.


I don't sup****t anything.  I have been saying the CCP leader****p has
been doing a great job in China, much better than our leader****p.

People only think about daily conditions of life, and today, the
Chinese people, and especially the Tibetans people are living much
better than anytime since the beginning of history.  They are happy,
have food to eat, money to spend, and all they think about are
themselves, not human rights, not elections, not the CCP, and
certainly not the problems of the world, and they don't give a damn
about what you think.