Re: Is a 'Free Tibet' a possibility?

On May 12, 11:00=A0pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:23:38 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
> (in article
> <2ee7bea0-c9d3-47f1-bec3-ad7022627...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > Do you mean the unelected government in Beijing could allow any
province=
 to
> > go independent at any time they want at will and do so without
repercuss=
ion
> > in terms of public pressure?
>
> I can not sup****t the unelected government of the CCP at all.
>
> But I suppose that I would not object to it doing something wise and
human=
e
> (ban the use of capital punishment, for example; free public education
thr=
u
> high school for another).
>
> I have made it clear that the Chinese should have basic human rights,
the
> sooner the better.
>
> Once the Chinese are free, they will behave better toward their
neighbors =
and
> each other. Were the Tibetans to vote for independence (with proper
> guarantees regarding the national debt, etc), I suppose the Chinese
would =
let
> them go in peace (just as the Canadians would let Quebec go).

You must be talking in your dreams...Ask not just the people living in
Tibet, but the other 57 ethnic groups and see how they view this
thing.


>
> And a democratic government of China would not violate the freedom of
> religion rights of Tibetans.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure
Usenet=
 News=3D=3D----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the
World=
! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=
=3D----