Re: Confusinism = Cronism

On May 12, 6:13=A0pm, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 12, 11:13 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008 22:49:47 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> > (in article
> > <b78face7-c1d5-4833-8112-c04538e28...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > > On May 12, 4:34 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 12 May 2008 07:03:46 +0800, baldeagle wrote
> > >> The claim that Con****ius told the Chinese "never to question" their
e=
lders
> > >> is false.
> > > You obviously know very little about Con****ius teaching.
>
> You know almost nothing about Con****ius teaching.
>
> > How many times have you read his works?
>
> My grandpa taught me to behave according to
> Con****ius teaching before I could walk. It is our(Chinese)
> cultural heritage. The Chinese need not read books
> to learn his great teaching.

Replace "great" with "old, outdated and useless".
>
> For people like you, what is the use of reading his words..
> you don't understand what you read....very obvious from
> your postings.
>
> =A0I read them slowly. It takes me about
>
>
>
> > two years to finish them. Then I start all over. I have read them at
lea=
st 5
> > times.
>
> > He is extremely deep. Most of my Chinese friends feel as you do that
he =
is a
> > part of their history that has no value today. On the other hand, some
> > Chinese (especially from Singa****e) claim that without him, there
would =
be no
> > Chinese culture.