Re: Expect more China-ba****ng in US campaign

On May 12, 8:06=A0am, demoris...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 12, 11:04=A0am, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On May 12, 12:29=A0am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 11 May 2008 11:53:27 +0800, ralph wrote
> > > (in article <parc2416mib1aient2l4o1q28u4hqij...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > > > Long past due for Chinese people to enjoy the basic human right of
f=
ree and
> > > > fair elections.
>
> > > Exactly right.
>
> > Look what we got after free and fair election; a George Worthless
> > Bush.
>
> Correction: two free and fair elections.

China deserves a better method, and they have a better method.
By proven ability in governing province and working with other leaders
in the national level.  Top leader****p picking replacement of their
own members of proven leader****p.  Maybe it is a better method.  Why
let morons elect other morons into office to be a fat cat?