Re: fyfpoon goes off the deep end.

On Mon, 12 May 2008 23:39:52 +0800, fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
(in article 
<a9b35d99-b031-43af-becb-d87e748cf941@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> On May 12, 11:00 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:25:34 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
>> (in article
>> <9401253b-4a31-45f6-ab11-fdeff0880...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>> 
>>> It is the human right of the down and outs in Canada to take some
petty 
>>> cash
>>> out of a Canadian bank just to buy a cup of coffee.  Is it asking too 
>>> much?  
>>> Well, that is what they want,  so give it to them.
>> 
>> No. Stealing the property of others is not a human right. (But you knew

>> that,
>> didn't you?)
> 
> So who owns Tibet?

The people of Tibet own Tibet.

>Whose properties does Tibet belong to?

Can't understand the question. Maybe I already answered it.


-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----