Re: I am who I am

On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:01:59 +0800, Jim Walsh
<jimNOwalsSPAMh3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Tue, 13 May 2008 20:02:33 +0800, Good soldier wrote
>(in article <msvi24h2kl5325pkti8rr2u7bpl97t5iqt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>> Using a false address and bragging how well known you are in the same
message 
>
>> smacks of hypocrisy does it not?
>
>No. Everyone (you including) disquises their email address to reduce
spam.
>
>I am posting under my real name (unlike you) and have for years.

You are simply playing with semantics. 

How do we know that "Jim Walsh" is your real name. After all you use
false email addresses, is it such a stretch on the imagination to
believe that if you lie about your address you might be lying about
your name also?

But you seem to believe that if I were posting under a name like, say,
"John Brown", or even "Jim Walsh", it would be more "real"? Or is that
really just an excuse to promote your particular ideas about aid
workers and disparage my actual observations?  I think the latter.

Cheers,

schweik
(Correct Address is goodsoldierschweikatgmaildotcom)