Re: I am who I am

On Wed, 14 May 2008 10:31:04 +0800, Good soldier wrote
(in article <aijk24965f8oip39q22cakt7t23kp9hsjc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:01:57 +0800, Jim Walsh
> <jimNOwalsSPAMh3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 20:02:33 +0800, Good soldier wrote
>> (in article <msvi24h2kl5325pkti8rr2u7bpl97t5iqt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>> 
>>> 
>>> Interesting you should post the comment "Call me or email me, if you
doubt 
>>> it". I did email you using both the From: address and the Reply to: 
>>> address 
>>> shown in your posts. Of course there was no response.
>> 
>> if you emailed me at jimwalsh3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 then I would have received
it. 
>> Since I didn't, you didn't.
> 
> You are being very obtuse. 

My email address is plain for all to see. Since I have not received email 
from you, you have not used it. I have received lots of email from other 
posters over the years.


-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----