haha:
>
祖國網絡上其實不是只有憤青。（又或者，憤青不罵人賣國賊時，也會講些人話？）
> http://news.yam.com/bcc/china/200805/20080514361728.html
>
> 中國一[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 塌？」「為什麼政府大樓蓋得那麼豪華堂皇？」，更有人直接批評，這些豆腐渣校
> 舍，都是官商勾結，偷工減料下的結果，最後卻由無辜孩童的鮮血來償還。
>
> 据媒體引述不願[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 懷疑有些學校建築根本連鋼筋都省了，遇到強震毫[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> －－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
>
>
好在上述的質疑是大陸網友說的。若是港政版各位提及的話，又要被人罵作[EMAIL PROTECTED]
....
Is certainly responsible for making the bad situation worse.
And, is emotionally satisfying to blame it all on heartless
builders. The larger issue, however, is the conscious trade-
off that is represented in the building code.
Even the TGD was designed to withstand a magnitude 7.0 quake.
That, is extremely risky in a region that is well known for
its geological instability. Chinese civil engineers are now
in a mad scramble, to repair damages to all the dams in that
entire region. Unfortunately, many are beyond repair, and,
have to be dynamited.
However, building it to tighter specifications (8.0 or more)
is very costly. The People's Republic of California, for ex-
ample, build their public structures to withstand earthquake
of magnitude 9.0, but at ginormous cost. Surely "luxury" that
Sichuan's rural poor cannot afford. They are lucky to have a
crude shelter. Forced by reality, most took a chance.
And paid dearly ....
Regards,
Albert K. Fung
Casa Tres Palmas, Santa Ynez, California, USA.
---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
