On May 14, 4:29 am, israeliteknight <israelitekni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 13, 6:41 pm,RichAsianKid<richasian...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On May 12, 9:55 pm,israeliteknight<israelitekni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 12, 3:04 am,RichAsianKid<richasian...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 10, 10:12 pm,israeliteknight<israelitekni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I have an Indian friend who disagrees: he says that India
will=
"beat"
> > > > > > > China by 2050.
>
> > > > > > > When I asked him how that could be, economically, or
legislati=
vely, or
> > > > > > > militarily--he said "population, of course". To an Indian,
no=
thing
> > > > > > > but population counts--which is why almost a trillion of
them =
are
> > > > > > > lucky to earn $200 per month each. There certainly are
races =
and
> > > > > > > nations of the world who're going backwards so fast they
don't=
even
> > > > > > > know which way is forward, and in spite of all the
"technologi=
cal
> > > > > > > advancement" hoopla, India is one.
>
> > > > > > > Your chart on iq and gdp shows only 7 nations with iq's less
t=
han 70,
> > > > > > > but just in Africa [and only in Africa] are more than two
doze=
n
> > > > > > > nations with iq's lower than 70 and incomes to match. The
rea=
son
> > > > > > > that's significant is that these are the ancestors of many
Ame=
rican
> > > > > > > blacks who now want us to do something for them that their
own=
> > > > > > > ancestors couldn't do for them in ten thousand years or a
hund=
red
> > > > > > > thousands years, and won't in the next ten or hundred
thousand=
years
> > > > > > > [see below].
>
> > > > > > > Your chart on innovation is interesting--I'm surprised that
we=
, having
> > > > > > > scored dead last in 17 of 34 TIMSS subjects, were ranked
only =
third
> > > > > > > behind Japan, and ahead of Germany, Denmark, and
Netherlands. =
With
> > > > > > > all the products coming from Japan [and companies in China
own=
ed by
> > > > > > > Japan], it's surprising that Japan produces only 3-4 times
as =
many
> > > > > > > patents per capita as us. This must be just leftovers from
the=
era
> > > > > > > when we used to teach calculus, because now we can't even
find=
time to
> > > > > > > teach our students algebra. With all the vitally im****tant
> > > > > > > sensitivity and multiculturalism cl***** that come first,
curr=
ent
> > > > > > > graduates would be lucky to even flip hamburgers, much less
ma=
ke
> > > > > > > shoes.
>
> > > > > > > fc.. Burundi - 70*
>
> > > > > > > fd.. Cameroon - 70*
>
> > > > > > > fe.. Rwanda - 70*
>
> > > > > > > ff.. Angola - 69*
>
> > > > > > > fg.. Benin - 69*
>
> > > > > > > fh.. Togo - 69*
>
> > > > > > > fi.. Central African Rep. - 68*
>
> > > > > > > fj.. Djibouti - 68*
>
> > > > > > > fk.. Eritrea - 68*
>
> > > > > > > fl.. Mali - 68*
>
> > > > > > > fm.. Somalia - 68*
>
> > > > > > > fn.. Niger - 67*
>
> > > > > > > fo.. Nigeria - 67
>
> > > > > > > fp.. Burkina Faso - 66*
>
> > > > > > > fq.. Gabon - 66*
>
> > > > > > > fr.. Zimbabwe - 66
>
> > > > > > > fs.. Congo (Zaire) - 65
>
> > > > > > > ft.. Gambia - 64*
>
> > > > > > > fu.. Liberia - 64*
>
> > > > > > > fv.. Senegal - 64*
>
> > > > > > > fw.. Sierra Leone - 64
>
> > > > > > > fx.. Ethiopia - 63
>
> > > > > > > fy.. Guinea - 63
>
> > > > > > > fz.. Guinea-Bissau - 63*
>
> > > > > > > ga.. Sao Tome/Principe - 59*
>
> > > > > > > gb.. Equatorial Guinea - 59
>
> > > > > > Thank you for this great reply. A few points:
>
> > > > > > (1) Education. Here's what we know in America:
>
> > > > > > Fifty Years of Math 1950s - 2000s
>
> > > > > > Teaching Math In 1950s: A logger sells a truckload of lumber
for=
$100.
> > > > > > His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his
profit?
>
> > > > > > Teaching Math In 1960s
> > > > > > A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His production
co=
st is
> > > > > > 4/5 of the price or $80. What is his profit?
>
> > > > > > Teaching Math In 1970s
> > > > > > A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
produ=
ction
> > > > > > is $80. Did he make a profit?
>
> > > > > > Teaching Math In 1980s
> > > > > > A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
produ=
ction
> > > > > > is $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the
num=
ber
> > > > > > 20.
>
> > > > > > Teaching Math In 1990s
> > > > > > A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish
and
> > > > > > inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or
th=
e
> > > > > > preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a
pro=
fit of
> > > > > > $20. What do you think of this way of making a living?
> > > > > > Topic for class participation after answering the question:
How =
did
> > > > > > the birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their
homes?=
There
> > > > > > are no wrong answers.
>
> > > > > > Teaching Math In 2000s
> > > > > > Un hachero vende una carretada de madera para $100. El costo
de
> > > > > > produccion es $80. Cuanto dinero ha hecho?
>
> > > > > > (2) India vs China (again)
>
> > > > > > Just to be brief here, here's yet another forecast:
>
> > > > > > http://i31.tinypic.com/95zfqp.jpg
>
> > > > > > Of course, this is size-dependent, so the US still leads. But
lo=
ok at
> > > > > > China vs India.
>
> > > > > > In fact another article I read says that by 2025 China will
outs=
trip
> > > > > > the GDP (PPP) of the US, while even at 2050 India will merely
be=
at
> > > > > > 90% the GDP (PPP) of the US!!
>
> > > > > > My point is not to say that China is rich as posters no doubt
kn=
ow.
> > > > > > The point here is that no matter how you slice and dice the
data=
,
> > > > > > China comes out ahead of India.
>
> > > > > > (3) Darwinian reproduction
>
> > > > > > Note that I don't necessarily fault the Indians for
reproducing =
like
> > > > > > crazy. The non-mainland Chinese have now controlled themselves
(=
check
> > > > > > out total fertiliy rates
herehttps://www.cia.gov/library/publica=
tions/the-world-factbook/rankorder...
> > > > > > and see that the LOWEST nations of the world [223 of them] are
> > > > > > actually not in Europe or North America - but in East Asia -
Hon=
g
> > > > > > Kong, Macau, Singa****e, Taiwan, and Japan and S Korea not far
be=
hind)
> > > > > > but really is this strength or weakness in the long run in a
Dar=
winian
> > > > > > struggle? You just have to look at which countries are at the
to=
p. It
> > > > > > is true that African countries are poor, uneducated, and just
pl=
ain
> > > > > > retarded (do you know that in the US black kids who come from
p=
arents
> > > > > > who make over $100K score LOWER than white kids who come from
pa=
rents
> > > > > > who make less than $10K???). But they're good at one thing:
> > > > > > reproduction. And in America they get paid to reproduce in the
f=
orm of
> > > > > > welfare! Now how sweet a deal is that? So no, in a way, it is
me=
rely a
> > > > > > survival strategy (no pun intended) I think, from a Darwinian
> > > > > > perspective. And there are many who just don't see the whole
pic=
ture.
>
> > > > > > (4) The innovation index - a speculation
>
> > > > > > If you look at page 10 of the EIU re****t posted earlier, it
high=
lights
> > > > > > how Japan and Taiwan are very efficient innovators: They
produce=
a lot
> > > > > > of innovations for a low level of inputs. Cross-reference that
t=
o page
> > > > > > 28 and you'll see that in terms of innovation 'enablers'
Taiwan =
ranks
> > > > > > 14, 16, 16 in Direct input, innovation environment, and
aggregat=
e
> > > > > > innovation enablers index, while it's output is ranked much
high=
er at
> > > > > > 8th. Japan's low levels of 11,23,14 inputs are likewise
matched =
by its
> > > > > > high output that is ranked 1st. It may be im****tant to control
f=
or
> > > > > > input as well. It goes back to the illustration of black
childre=
n -
> > > > > > how is it possible that black kids whose parents make over
$100K=
> > > > > > actually do worse off than white kids whose parents make less
th=
an
> > > > > > $10K?
>
> > > > > > I think environment can only do so much. People and groups are
> > > > > > different. But of course, that's one heresy and taboo we can
nev=
er
> > > > > > acknowledge. ;)
>
> > > > > Very good points.
>
> > > > > I LOVE the way you represent the change of "education" in the
US.
> > > > > People who don't believe SAT scores are down 30-60 points just
can=
't
> > > > > be thinking about this change in the way we "teach" children
today=
..
>
> > > > > Focusing just on GDP and ignoring Personal Savings misrepresents
t=
he
> > > > > power of Japan--who now has OFFICIALLY 95% of the world's
Personal=
> > > > > Savings, mostly in Postal Savings Accounts for which there are
no
> > > > > accountability and re****ting requirements. It wasn't that long
ag=
o
> > > > > that we were one of the 5 creditor nations, but now we're the
bigg=
est
> > > > > debtor nation in human history with no end in sight, while the
> > > > > creditor nations laugh all the way to the bank.
>
> > > > > The fertility rates are very revealing. When you put that into
> > > > > perspective with the UN population estimates and forecasts, they
a=
re
> > > > > shocking.
>
> > > > >http://christianparty.net/population.htm
>
> > > > > Between 1950 and 2000, a period of 50 years, the world
population =
more
> > > > > than doubled, from 2.56 billion to 5.77 billion, an annual
growth =
rate
> > > > > of 1.5%. Most of that growth was in the less developed
countries
> > > > > where the population grew from 1.7 to 4.9 billion. The
population=
of
> > > > > India increased 3.5 fold (2.5% per year) and of China 2.5 fold
(1.=
7%/
> > > > > year), adding another 1.4 billion people to the world, the
equival=
ent
> > > > > of 5 TIMES the total US population and 6 TIMES the US White
> > > > > population.
>
> > > > > The slowest growing countries were in Eastern Europe where
growth =
was
> > > > > either flat or less than 10%. The population of Russia actually
> > > > > decreased during some of those years. Even Belgium, Italy, the
UK=
,
> > > > > ****tugal, Austria, and Denmark experienced growth of less than
20=
%
> > > > > over this half century. The 1.75 fold increase in the US
populatio=
n
> > > > > (1.1% per year) was quite a bit higher than the 25% growth in
West=
ern
> > > > > Europe, but just the increase in the number of people in China
and=
> > > > > India was five times larger than our total population.
>
> > > > > Many of the fastest growing countries during this time were Arab
a=
nd
> > > > > African countries. The population of the United Arab Emirates
> > > > > increased 84 fold (8.1%/year), of Qatar 29 fold (6.5%/year), and
o=
f
> > > > > Kuwait 24 fold (5.8%/year). The populations of Namibia, Benin,
> > > > > Nigeria, Liberia, Sudan, Senegal, Swaziland, Cote d'Ivoire,
Togo, =
and
> > > > > French Guiana increased more than seven fold, or more than 4%
per
> > > > > year.
>
> > > > > Many of the countries with the fastest growing populations are
als=
o
> > > > > the ones with the shortest life expectancies, and vice versa.
The=
> > > > > life expectancy of men in Rwanda is only 33 years, but their
> > > > > population increased almost five fold, whereas the life
expectancy=
for
> > > > > men in Japan is 80 years, but their population increased only
50%.=
>
> > > > > Just in half a century, the INCREASE in the number of blacks in
Af=
rica
> > > > > was two TIMES the entire population of the US, and in the next
hal=
f a
> > > > > century, even WITH AIDS, it will increase another THREE TIMES
the =
US
> > > > > population [by 900 million, CONSERVATIVELY].
>
> > > > > > I think environment can only do so much. People and groups are
> > > > > > different. But of course, that's one heresy and taboo we can
nev=
er
> > > > > > acknowledge. ;)
>
> > > > > American blacks expect us to do for them what their ancestors
and
> > > > > cousins and relatives could NEVER do, not in 10-100,000 years:
ach=
ieve
> > > > > "racial equality" with Whites and Asians.
>
> > > > > It's hopeless. We BLEW TEN TRILLION DOLLARS just on increased
> > > > > education expenditures JUST for blacks and got exactly WHAT?
>
> > > > > ZERO.
>
> > > > > All we got is their red hot HATRED, just like "pastor" Wright
and
> > > > > obamabanana ADMIT on national TV@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > Big deal. I can get blacks to HATE us even more, and not spend
a
> > > > > NICKEL doing it.
>
> > > > Regarding Japanese wealth, in yet another UN-WIDER study that's
very=
> > > > well publicized late 2006, in terms of personal net worth in US
> > > > exchange rates in US dollars (which partly reflects savings) the
> > > > Japanese rank at the top. Hong Kong ranked #2, and the US ranked
> > > > fifth.
>
> > > > http://i17.tinypic.com/42vv8ev.jpg
>
> > > > The study further highlights that if you cut off the bottom 99% of
t=
he
> > > > world population (which actually, believe it or not, translates to
> > > > *only* a net worth of $500K US but that's a detail), a whopping
27% =
of
> > > > these individuals are Japanese, even if the Japanese themselves
are
> > > > ~2% of the world population. That number itself is staggering.
> > > > Japanese are as humble as always, but it is probably very
difficult
> > > > not to feel some visceral sense of superiority towards the
mainland
> > > > Chinese, let alone Indians.
>
> > > > As for population growth, here's another future
projection:http://ww=
w.buchanan.org/blog/?p=3D985Alsoas noted elsewhere by
> > > > Buchanan, feminism often translates into lower fertility rates as
> > > > women defer child-bearing and pursue higher careers, and on a
societ=
al
> > > > level this leads to a demographic implosion, which in turn often
> > > > necessitates the im****ting poor and failed peoples, the "wretched
> > > > refuse", from all around the globe and who are utterly unlike the
ho=
st
> > > > population (if these people were successful to begin with in their
o=
wn
> > > > country they probably wouldn't have migrated in the first place).
Th=
at
> > > > is, civilization crumbles.
>
> > > > Last, about Africa and blacks, there is in fact strong evidence
that=
> > > > spending per student does not increase student performance as you
no=
> > > > doubt know.
>
> > > > http://i5.tinypic.com/5xfyi55.jpg
>
> > > > As side point there's an interesting study
http://tinyurl.com/5obn8=
y
> > > > that points to how wealth negatively correates with crime across
> > > > European and East Asian countries (not surprising), but is
> > > > **positively** correlated with crime in African countries.
>
> > > > Quote: "These data speak to one of the most im****tant issues
facing
> > > > the field
> > > > of criminology in showing there are significant differences in
murde=
r,
> > > > rape,
> > > > and serious assaults in East Asian, European, and African
countries
> > > > that
> > > > parallel those found within Britain, Canada, and the United
States.
> > > > Moreover,
> > > > the crime differences cannot simply be attributed to =93poverty=94
f=
or
> > > > such an explanation does not fit the finer-grained analyses found
> > > > within
> > > > African countries where violent crime increased with GDP. This
could=
> > > > be
> > > > because only wealthier nations have the infrastructure to gather
and=
> > > > re****t
> > > > crime statistics comparable to those for East Asia and Europe. It
is=
> > > > also
> > > > possible that there are some gene-culture interactions when
> > > > op****tunities
> > > > become available for engaging in behavior not otherwise
affordable. =
In
> > > > Africa, for example, there is a link between wealth and AIDS:
> > > > wealthier males turn their resources into ***ual partners (Rushton
&=
> > > > Bogaert, 1989)."
>
> > > > And in the US, in spite of affirmative action and in spite of all
th=
e
> > > > handouts, black behavior has gotten much more pathological (by
white=
> > > > standards) over the decades. It may not be unreasonable to
speculate=
> > > > that newfound resources liberated the true 'inner nature' of the
> > > > blacks when they're freed from constraints -- and this is in
> > > > contradistinction to other population groups.
>
> > > > The authors found it perplexing why it is that in AFrican
countries
> > > > there is a link between wealth and AIDS - and they quoted
wealthier
> > > > males turn their resources into ***ual partners. .
>
> > > Great charts.
>
> > > And great points, as usual.
>
> > > The only serious errors I see on the net worth chart are:
>
> > > 1) The US--per household, even after including home "owner****p"
[which=
> > > really means debt to the Japanese who own the banks which charge
usury=
> > > they don't charge their own citizens], our net "worth" is a NEGATIVE
> > > $73,000, not a positive $143k. And that figure might be low because
> > > of the way Congress has concealed much of this debt, which only Ron
> > > Paul understands and has been willing to risk his life and
reputation
> > > to expose.
>
> > > 2) Japan--even the Bank of Japan admits that net worth per household
> > > in Japan, excluding real estate, is in excess of $1 million. In ONE
> > > month, in December, each household in Japan socked away another TEN
> > > THOUSAND DOLLARS:
>
> > >http://christianparty.net/japanmonetarybase.htm
>
> > > "Also as noted elsewhere by Buchanan, feminism often translates into
> > > lower fertility rates as women defer child-bearing and pursue higher
> > > careers, and on a societal
> > > level this leads to a demographic implosion", PLUS feminazis didn't
> > > gain a single slim dime, because as noted by the US Census Bureau:
>
> > > 1) Adding women to the owner****p of a man owned business reduces
its
> > > potential receipts by $323,300 or 55.5%.
> > > 2) Adding men to the owner****p of a woman owned business increases
> > > its potential receipts by $108,100 or 71.5%.
> > > 3) Completely removing women from owner****p increases potential
> > > receipts by $431,400 to four fold greater than a woman owned
business
> > > with no men owners present.
>
> > > iow, even the US Census Bureau knows that the net contribution of
> > > women to GDP is a NEGATIVE number, a HUGE negative number.
>
> > > That chart on education spending is way too conservative, in my
> > > opinion. If we take the opposite ends of the spectrum, which are
> > > essentially obliterated on that graph, we'll see that the country
> > > which spends the LEAST [less than $3,000 per student annually] is
also=
> > > the country which almost always scores the HIGHEST [Korea, TIMSS =3D
> > > 605], and the country which outspends almost everyone else [more
than
> > > $16,000 per student annually] is also the country which scores the
> > > LOWEST of any industrialized nation [US, TIMSS =3D 496].
>
> > > While we pretend that a public education is "free", most students in
> > > Korea are in PRIVATE schools--which are obviously "free-er" in that
> > > context, not just in cost, but subject matter which parents have ONE
> > > HUNDRED PERCENT control over [while parents here can't even make
their=
> > > children do homework without them dialing 911].
>
> > > If a teacher in Korea ever tried to teach a student that their own
> > > Korean Race was sub-human, which teachers here are REQUIRED to do
now
> > > regarding the WHITE RACE, every parent in Korea would have their
kids
> > > out of that school within the hour.
>
> > > That's a great study on crime rates and wealth. It was absolutely
> > > certain even by our own data that this was the case, but it's sure
> > > nice to see it verified in other countries.
>
> > > WHO WAS THE MURDER CAPITOL OF THE WORLD MORE THAN ANY OTHER CITY?
> > > Well, Wa****ngton, DC. Where are the WEALTHIEST BY FAR blacks in the
> > > world? WA****NGTON, DC.
>
> > > duh.
>
> > > Who has the lowest murder rate in the world? West Virginia. Who
has
> > > the LOWEST incomes [at least in the US]? West Virginia.
>
> > > And EXACTLY WHAT is the difference? When DC achieved that status,
82%=
> > > of its population were blacks. Less than 4% of West Virginia's
> > > population are blacks.
>
> > > Same pattern for EVERY other US city EXCEPT those with a high
> > > percentage of Hispanics--need I say more?
>
> > All very illuminating points, and thank you again for all those
> > numbers! Certainly a lot of food for thought.... I think it
> > illustrates a point: it looks like nature somehow returns with a
> > pitchfork, whether it's feminism (low fertility rates and societal
> > collapse) or multiculturalism (dumbing down, "no child left behind!")
> > or communism (poverty).
>
> > I agree with practically everything you said, and I bet a lot of
> > posters here on these newsgroups do to. And that's why I just want to
> > ask this $1M question as if I'm the MC here: one of the things
> > NorthEast Asians won't understand is why do gentile whites allow this
> > "tragedy" to happen and/or self-afflict this tragedy upon themselves.
> > Now, of course, the US won WWII and so it perhaps has this leeway,
> > this luxe, this leverage, but as times goes by it surely looks
> > increasingly masochistic if not outright suicidal. And this has been
> > somewhat of a puzzle to me too. I know what you're going to say, Jews
> > are responsible for this and that. Again, fair enough, but really, do
> > you think the Koreans or NE Asians in general would even have allowed
> > this to happen if given a choice? Given a choice, as in, 'not
> > conquered'. People submit under force, but who would submit
> > voluntarily? You just have to look at the poor poor third world lower
> > IQ Malays vs the higher IQ Chinese. The Malays don't exactly welcome
> > the Chinese with open arms even if the Chinese (perhaps?) bring
> > benefits to Malaysia.
>
> > As for Korean education, here's a fascinating illustration of what
> > they're taught about the Japanese:
>
> > http://uqmgp.hp.infoseek.co.jp/
>
> > And the thing is this: Koreans and Japanese are phylogenetic brothers
> > and sisters!!!
>
> > And still one other point which I posted before: Singa****e's founder
> > Lee Kwan Yew is way more realist:
>
> > http://tinyurl.com/48rm38
>
> > Keep in mind that respect stems from self-respect, and if you don't
> > respect yourself, nobody else will. That's how many white liberals are
> > sabotaging their own. Yes, it's true, white guilt may be the
> > counterpart of Asian shame; I still highly doubt Asian shame will go
> > so far.
>
> Well, of course, it's no secret, Lee Kwan Yew is far more qualified to
> be president of the US than a crypto-jew like Clinton EVER could be,
> MAINLY because being REALISTIC about races would be better for ALL
> races, but particularly the WHITE race.
>
> WHITE MEN, not White women, must work 42 days each year JUST to earn
> enough to pay JUST the taxes which fund JUST the social transfer
> payments JUST to blacks, which works out to a TRILLION DOLLARS
> ANNUALLY, or 2 Dubais per year.
>
> http://christianparty.net/dubai.htm
RichAsianKid asks innocently: what about Obama in reference to your
Lee Kwan Yew comment? Asians will never (seldom) go Obama and they
vote massively for Hillary (much like Hispanics) not so much because
they're for Hillary but because they're against Obama. But there're 3
points worth considering I think: (a) if Obama becomes the Dem nominee
and if he becomes prez beating McCain (huge assumption of course)
then it will wake a lot of Americans up as to where the country is
going (b) if Obama is prez then everytime there=92s some earth-
shattering cry & complaint about alleged "racism" the reflexive
response has got to be =93yo how then can a majority white country vote
some retard negro into power=94? That is, remember this: when Condi Rice
visited China a while back the Chinese were calling her black *****
and scratching their heads wondering =93how can the US vote a chimpanzee
as secretary of state=94? And so I guarantee you if Obama were to become
prez any residual US real or alleged prestige will be flushed down the
toilet; but still: (c) doesn't Hillary deserve her comeuppance, i.e.
isn=92t it sweet poetic justice that those little little people that she
spent her lifetime championing for ends up rejecting her in favor of
something (sic) else?
As a friend of mine quipped, if you mix ice cream with ****, the ice
cream becomes ****, but the **** still doesn=92t taste any better.
>
> > Now, of course, the US won WWII and so it perhaps has this leeway,
> > this luxe, this leverage, but as times goes by it surely looks
> > increasingly masochistic if not outright suicidal
>
> I was unaware that we won any wars. To win a war, somebody has to
> lose.
>
> German household incomes are now more than TWICE as high as ours, and
> that's AFTER reunification with a quarter of the country which had
> been dumbed down by half a century of communism. And their personal
> savings rates are higher than 27%, compared to our NEGATIVE rate.
>
> Japanese household incomes are more than two and probably three times
> higher than ours, and the official savings rate of 33% greatly under-
> represents how much they REALLY save.
>
> Of course neither country got saddled with a trillion dollar black
> albatross.
>
> The cost of government per household in Japan is $8,000/year, and
> household incomes are 14 times that. The cost of government per
> household in the US is $44,000 annually and average male incomes are
> 86% of that.
>
> I lived in both Japan and Korea and know that this contest between
> them is a two way street. I actually favor the Korean view right now,
> as I'm on my way to North Korea and China to see first hand more than
> 200 pyramids, some of which are clearly bigger and perhaps grander
> than the Giza Pyramid. The most interesting one is the tomb of
> Dangun, the patriarch of Korea [and perhaps both Japan and China].
> It's really frustrating to be in countries like these where people can
> be openly proud of their races, then come back to the US and be called
> a "racist" for DARING to just say "white". But I'm gonna say it
> anyway--the other pyramid in China is the Great WHITE Pyramid );
>
> It's only when I'm away from the country and come back that I sense or
> feel the answer to your question "why do gentile whites allow this
> 'tragedy' to happen and/or self-afflict this tragedy upon themselves"?
>
> The White Race ba****ng in our "media" is chronic, incessant,
> pervasive, unstoppable, continual, never ending, 24 hours a day, 7
> days a week. And there's no question that jews are involved in this
> intricate process: though they are way too stupid to have masterminded
> such an ingenious and *successful* plan. It's not just the US, it's
> most White nations. Even in places like Ireland, where the flow of
> this garbage is about 1% of what it is here, it REALLY gets on your
> nerves [even though it's much more subtle].
>
> The DAY we cut it off is the DAY all Whites will snap out of the
> trance. We had a chance with the internet, and if Ron Paul wins
> because of the internet, and crypto-jews like McCain whose OPENLY jew
> wife is the DAUGHTER of the jewish mafia leader [who's OPENLY AND
> ILLEGALLY funding him] LOSES, jews can pack it up and go home.
>
> I agree that no Asian race would allow this to happen, so it's really
> embarasing that we let it happen here. Had it not been for AIDS
> knocking off million jews recently, they might have realized their
> wildest dreams.
>
> http://christianparty.net/aids.htm
Here's an interesting take on Japan from an American nationalist --
fast forward to the 35 minute mark after that Elvis song and then you
can start listening. I've posted this before but it bears repeating.
Very very highly recommended: http://tinyurl.com/32c36t
Once
again fast forward to the 35 minute mark
first
Cheers,
|
