Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Mostly Prai...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 23 Topic 46276 of 54010
Post > Topic >>

Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake

by Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 18, 2008 at 07:35 PM

Below is another re****t on the intensity / magnitude of the earthquake
from Japanese resarches.
China Quake Delivered Seismic One-Two Punch
****no Yuasa in Tokyo
Associated Press

May 15, 2008

The fault line that caused this week's devastating earthquake in China
probably buckled in two stages, and the hardness of the terrain
contributed to the wide reach of the damage, Japanese scientists said
Thursday.

The magnitude 7.9 quake on Monday struck in Sichuan Province but
rattled buildings as far away as Beijing, Shanghai, and Thailand. (See
photos of the earthquake's destruction.)

The quake has affected ten million people and may have killed as many
as 50,000, according to a revised death toll estimate released by the
Chinese government today.

Yuji Yagi, a seismologist at Tsukuba University, said data show the
155-mile (250-kilometer) Longmenshan Fault tore in two sections.

The first section ripped about 7 yards (6.4 meters). The second
sheared 4 yards (4.6 meters).

(Related: "Pandas, Tourists Safe After China Quake; Local Towns
Leveled" [May 14, 2008].)

But it wasn't the two stages that made the quake so damaging. The
shallowness of the epicenter=97only ten miles (ten kilometers)
underground=97contributed most to the temblor's destructive power, Yagi
said.

"The damage was very severe because the quake's epicenter was shallow
and the quake occurred in densely populated areas," Yagi said.

The other distingui****ng factor to the quake was the firmness of the
terrain in central China, which allowed seismic waves to travel large
distances without losing their power, Tokyo University seismologist
Teruyuki Kato said.

Kato contrasted the hardness of the land in China with that in Japan,
where patches of soft terrain can often blunt the reach of
earthquakes.

"The strata are very hard in the quake-hit region, and that allowed
the seismic waves to travel far, while their strength remained
intact," he said.

Japan is one of the world's most quake-prone nations, and media there
have focused on the possible role of shoddy construction methods in
the large death toll in the China quake.

Japan's most destructive quake in recent times was the magnitude 7.3
temblor in the western city of Kobe, which killed more than 6,400
people in January 1995.

Yagi calculated that the energy level of the China quake was 30 times
that of the one that struck Kobe.
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-18 22:30:20 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-18 13:04:42 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-18 13:19:40 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 19:30:54 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 14:18:43 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 19:35:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 23:19:34 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 14:29:06 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-19 21:13:01 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
thekingassss@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-19 21:20:29 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
koki <guzhengqiu@[EMAI  2008-05-19 22:12:56 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-21 13:51:20 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-21 13:52:46 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 15:31:18 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:26 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-23 18:13:01 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 18:30:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:27 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-23 18:58:03 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 19:56:14 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-24 03:27:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
demorising@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-25 17:05:54 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-25 18:17:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 9:07:46 CST 2008.