Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Mostly Prai...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 23 Topic 46276 of 54010
Post > Topic >>

Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake

by Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPAMh3@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 19, 2008 at 02:18 PM

On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:30:54 +0800, Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
(in article 
<2117a02d-5c3b-4be0-8111-41ef99e69311@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> On May 18, 7:30 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Earthquakes and other natural disasters are a-political; they strike
>> regardless.
>> 
>> Unlike Burma, where the leader****p committed crimes against humanity,
the 
>> CCP
>> did most of the right things. The key correct decision was not to hide
the
>> facts (a common failing in previous cases: i.e., SARs.) Allowing the
Chinese
>> media the re****t the news live was a huge breakthrough. The second
correct
>> decision was for the leader****p to rush massive resources to the scene.
>> 
>> (Sadly, the CCP was unwilling to accept foreign experts -- like the dog

>> teams
>> from Japan -- early enough so they could save lives.)
>> 
>> Undoubtedly, the Chinese media could have been more aggressive (the
habit of
>> following the Party Line is hard to break). For example, some buildings
that
>> should have survived the quake collapsed as a result of poor
construction 
>> and
>> the Chinese media could have investigated such things to learn if
negligence
>> or dishonesty or both were involved.
> 
> 
>> --
>> Love, Jim
>> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
>> crossposts.)
>> 
>> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet 
>> News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the
World! 
>> 120,000+ Newsgroups
>> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
> 
> Why compare China response with Burma ? Why not compare China response
> with Katrina ?

Oh, because the Katrina response, incompetent tho it was, was better
managed 
than the Chinese one.

Sending tens of thousands of troops was the right thing to do. But the 
soldiers lacked the tools or the training to provide high quality help.
The 
US response was too slow in getting started, but once they woke up George 
Bush (who was on vacation) and turned on his TV, he sent soldiers with 
appropriate training and equipment.

In terms of loss of life, the Katrina rescue was (compared to China's) not

all that bad.

-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-18 22:30:20 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-18 13:04:42 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-18 13:19:40 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 19:30:54 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 14:18:43 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 19:35:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 23:19:34 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 14:29:06 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-19 21:13:01 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
thekingassss@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-19 21:20:29 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
koki <guzhengqiu@[EMAI  2008-05-19 22:12:56 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-21 13:51:20 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-21 13:52:46 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 15:31:18 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:26 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-23 18:13:01 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 18:30:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:27 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-23 18:58:03 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 19:56:14 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-24 03:27:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
demorising@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-25 17:05:54 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-25 18:17:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 9:27:45 CST 2008.