Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: Mostly Prai...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 23 Topic 46276 of 54010
Post > Topic >>

Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake

by Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 19, 2008 at 09:13 PM

>
> > Why compare China response with Burma ? Why not compare China response
> > with Katrina ?
>
> Oh, because the Katrina response, incompetent tho it was, was better
managed
> than the Chinese one.
>
> Sending tens of thousands of troops was the right thing to do. But the
> soldiers lacked the tools or the training to provide high quality help.
The
> US response was too slow in getting started, but once they woke up
George
> Bush (who was on vacation) and turned on his TV, he sent soldiers with
> appropriate training and equipment.
>
> In terms of loss of life, the Katrina rescue was (compared to China's)
not
> all that bad.
>
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Really weird logic. Jim is so proud of US Katrina response. A 3rd
world Response from the richest country in the world.

Here is a quote from a post cut from Utube.

Why do the media constantly compare the rescue and relief operations
between China and Myanmar? Let's compare China with the US:

In China, an earthquake that registered 8.0 struck with no warning.
The Premier was on the plane to the disaster centre 90 minutes later
to co-ordinate the rescue and relief effort; local, provincial and
national and military authorities immediately ordered an all-out
rescuing effort, no arguments, no buck passing. Air****ts and buildings
were evacuated in little over 30 minutes and police and emergency
workers swung into action at about the same time. Soldiers poured into
the diaster sites by planes, trucks and, where the roads were damaged,
by walking for hours. Victims helped themselves and others where they
could; everything was orderly; no chaos, no looting, no crimes and no
unreasonable demands, knowing at times of crisis, action,
understanding and unity is the best for all.

In the US, a hurricane struck after 48 hours warning. The President
reluctantly terminated his holidays one and a half days after the
diaster struck; the Secretary of States was seen in New York shopping
for designer shoes while people waited for help. Rescue and relief
efforts were slow and ineffective. The state Governor blames the
Federal and the Federal blames the state; the mayor blames everybody
else. Four days after the diaster, troops armed to the teeth appeared
on the street in their Humvees, not there to rescue anybody but to
maintain law and order and shoot looters. Many police officers wanted
to quit or retire early.

I hope this diaster will prompt some in the west who have long hold a
deep bias and prejudice against China to rethink. Is democracy a be
all, end all thing? If not, let China evolve by its own accord and in
its own pace.
 




 23 Posts in Topic:
Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-18 22:30:20 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-18 13:04:42 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-18 13:19:40 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 19:30:54 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 14:18:43 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 19:35:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-18 23:19:34 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-19 14:29:06 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-19 21:13:01 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
thekingassss@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-19 21:20:29 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
koki <guzhengqiu@[EMAI  2008-05-19 22:12:56 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-21 13:51:20 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-21 13:52:46 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 15:31:18 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:26 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-23 18:13:01 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 18:30:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-25 16:31:27 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-23 18:58:03 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 19:56:14 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
chatnoir <wolfbat359a@  2008-05-24 03:27:36 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
demorising@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-25 17:05:54 
Re: Mostly Praise for the Response to the Quake
ltlee1 <ltlee1@[EMAIL   2008-05-25 18:17:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 9:39:54 CST 2008.