Re: CISCO Joins Google & Yahoo In Helping Chinks To Censor Internet,

It *is* interesting that Cisco would chuck it's ethics when it makes 
much ado about "...empowering the Human Network." There is a difference 
between filling a business need and being an op****tunistic 
bottom-feeder. In this situation, while I don't agree with censor****p, 
the bottom-feeding approach that'll be justified by "capitalism" is an 
area Cisco shouldn't play. The right thing would be to take the 
high-ground and sell gear and services without actively sup****ting a 
political or religious cause. But then again, Cisco has a history of 
questionable ethics in dealing with even their direct customers.

Something about leopards and spots comes to mind.


RussellT wrote:
> "Drooler" <perryneheum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>
news:a37ab615-19fc-40c7-830c-54a18eef13ab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> SAD TO RE****T, BUT SOME 52 PERCENT OF U.S. VOTERS STILL BELIEVE THEIR
>> WHITE HOUSE WAR CRIMINAL IS A "GOOD" PRESIDENT, EVEN THOUGH POLLS SHOW
>> HIS APPROVAL RATING AT 27 PERCENT.
>>
>> WHY?
>>
>> Because the red-staters who twice voted for their Nincompoop-In-Chief
>> are still as uneducated and misinformed as they were in 2000 and 2004.
>>
>> Duped, and benightedly so.
> 
> I will tell you the obvious:
> 1. Business, by it's nature is not loyal to any country. It's nature is
to 
> increase profits. This is not a criticism.
> 2. It is extremely unlikely that any of the candidates will do much with

> this issue, or will even want to.
> 3. Obama will be President, and he will weaken the US both economically
and 
> militarily, because both he, the majority of Americans, and the US media
are 
> very naive in both areas.
> 
>