Re: China: Mandate of heaven?

On Wed, 21 May 2008 08:43:20 -0700, "Albert K. Fung"
<akwfung@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>> 天道有常，不為堯存，不為桀亡 .... (荀子/天論篇)
>
>pan6pcpc:
>
>> Do you really understand the sentence above ?
>> It means "The nature has its own rules,which does not depend on whether
>> the emperor is cruel or kind".
>> 
>> And you maybe know these:
>> 子曰:未知生,焉知死?
>> 子曰:未能事人,焉能事鬼?
>> 子不语怪力乱神。
>
>Just a few points of fact ....

A few points shows your post cultural revolution junk. You must be
just another uneducated red guard. What a shame for a person to quote
something he doesn't really approve or understand. It would be better
you remain an obedient western slave by not showing off your ignorance
about Chinese cultural heritage. It will confuse and mislead your
western master.

>
>Nature, is not the Chinese notiion of heaven. The former, is
>passive and amoral. While the latter is anthropomorphic, and
>benevolent.
>
>Dao, is far more comprehensive and encompassing than rule.
>
>A more appropriate translation is: "The Heaven, moves in its
>consistent ways and does not entertain favoritism."
>
>As to the quotes from the Con****ian Analects, one must under
>-stand that the gentleman from Qufu does not have an body of
>work that amounts to a philosophical system.  His followers,
>the likes of 荀子, labored hard to give the school of thought
>a metaphorical foundation, among other theoretical contribut
>-ions. Without which Con****ianism would just be a collection
>of inconsistent moral imperatives.
>
>And contradictory ethical dictums ....
>
>Regards,
>
>Albert K. Fung
>Casa Tres Palmas, Santa Ynez, California, USA.
>---
>Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
>Complaints to news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]