On May 25, 8:05=A0pm, demoris...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 20, 12:13=A0am, Lproud...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Here is a quote from a post cut from Utube.
>
> > Why do the media constantly compare the rescue and relief operations
> > between China and Myanmar? Let's compare China with the US:
>
> > In China, an earthquake that registered 8.0 struck with no warning.
> > The Premier was on the plane to the disaster centre 90 minutes later
> > to co-ordinate the rescue and relief effort; local, provincial and
> > national and military authorities immediately ordered an all-out
> > rescuing effort, no arguments, no buck passing. Air****ts and buildings
> > were evacuated in little over 30 minutes and police and emergency
> > workers swung into action at about the same time. Soldiers poured into
> > the diaster sites by planes, trucks and, where the roads were damaged,
> > by walking for hours. Victims helped themselves and others where they
> > could; everything was orderly; no chaos, no looting, no crimes and no
> > unreasonable demands, knowing at times of crisis, action,
> > understanding and unity is the best for all.
>
> http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/re****ters-get-their-first-sniff-of-f...
>
> A senior Chinese journalist complained bitterly to a colleague in
> Beijing that the Government's days were numbered because the rescue
> operations he had seen had been chaotic. But the story that he filed
> for his newspaper the next day reflected none of those concerns. It
> was a touching story of survival amid tragedy.
Looks like another piece of fake news. How could any seneior
journalist reach the conclusion that the government's day were
numbered from chaotic rescue operations? Rescue operations in response
to emergencies are mostly unplannaed. Chaotic is usual. Unless the
government had do something which are clearly wrong and had a lot of
people killed as the results of such mistakess, the line of reasoning
from chaotic rescue efforts to the collapse of the government makes no
sense at all.
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
