On May 25, 11:43=A0pm, RichAsianKid <richasian...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 25, 4:31 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 24 May 2008 06:41:52 +0800,RichAsianKidwrote
> > (in article
> > <2efae530-2326-4e9f-a2d8-8d075cd16...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > > On May 22, 1:17 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >> 4. Suppose "Chinese" means dark hair, brown eyes, and so on. I know
l=
ots of
> > >> Native Americans who could pass for a Chinese, but I will never be
ab=
le to.
>
> > > You got that right for once. In fact, in your Cavalli-Sforza
citation
> > > that you so proudly trumpet, you know that native Americans are
> > > actually close cousins to Asians (aside from lower IQ of course),
> > > phylogenetically. Again, that's based on your sources. Evidence once
> > > again that ancestry matters, and populations are not equal.
>
> > Your claim that ancestry matters and your snide remark about IQ are
> > inconsistent.
>
> > If IQ depended on ancestry (race), the Native Americans and Chinese
Amer=
icans
> > would have identical scores.
>
> Identical scores? "IDENTICAL"? Looks like our innumerate Jim Walsh
> doesn't understand correlation either, wow.
>
>
>
> > --
> > Love, Jim
> > (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove
excessive
> > crossposts.)
>
> > ----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure
Usen=
et News=3D=3D----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe#1
Newsgroup Service in the
Worl=
d! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> > ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =
=3D----- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
<<<Identical scores? "IDENTICAL"? Looks like our innumerate Jim Walsh
doesn't understand correlation either, wow. >>>
No, of course he does NOT.
If he can't grasp the simple concept of race, something every race
from the beginning of time, INCLUDING AND ESPECIALLY the African
races, even the ones with IQs lower than 59, has been able to grasp,
then correlation is not even an abstract concept to him.
Ironic that he DOES admit that he believes in race when he tries to
argue that Asians and Indians should have "equal" IQs because [he
believes] they are of the same "race", eh?
No race has higher IQ's than Asians, and only blacks have lower IQs
than Indians, proof enough that, even IF they share a common [ONE
common] ancestor, the ancestors that they DO NOT share are more
significant than the ones they DO share.
Your data about what happens when Asians marry blacks is abundant
proof of what happened: the IQ of the offspring of that marriage is
only slightly higher than the IQ of the black parent and MUCH lower
than the IQ of the Asian parent. And that's precisely where Indians
fall on that scale, plus DNA shows that many Indians have a
significant amount of Negroid ancestry which obviously Asians [and
most other races] DO NOT.
When ****tugal was 100% Caucasoid, it was a world sea power. When it
reached 10% Negroid, it completely collapsed, never to recover [now
with an average IQ 5 points lower than Spain, which also miscegenated
with Moors, jews and blacks--but at least came to its senses and
kicked them all out in 1492].
|
