Re: RAK can't admit it when he is wrong.

On May 29, 11:58 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:33:17 +0800,RichAsianKidwrote
> (in article
> <775d05a9-284a-482d-b9cc-eba88ce27...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>
>
> > And like I said, me against my brother, me and my brother against my
cousin
>
> Actually that is false. You depend every day on people who are not
closely
> related to you. Were they to suddenly cease to function in your favor,
you
> would be in deep ****.
>

And if all factors being equal or negligibly different, why should I
choose someone (or something) more distant to me?

     http://i32.tinypic.com/5e76zr.jpg

> Pretending that they are not on your team, inside your working group, is
> intellectually dishonest. No surprise there.
>

Ironically that's where EQ comes in in *real* life. You don't *really*
have to publicly proclaim blacks are dumb as if that's like some new
discovery. You can even muse just how wonderfully diverse an
experience it will be to have half-retarded HIV+ve mothers or children
in your immediate family... and you score status points and moral
points and you thereby can further your individual interests.



> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----