Re: RAK can't admit it when he is wrong.

On May 29, 11:58 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:33:17 +0800,RichAsianKidwrote
> (in article
> <775d05a9-284a-482d-b9cc-eba88ce27...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > thus I do love your examples. There are many more....Sunnis and
****ites,
> > Chinese and Malays, Sinhalese and Tamils, etc etc.
>
> All refuting your claim: "Perhaps that's why blacks are always seen as
the
> 'other' in virtually every society."
>
> Are you now admitting that claim is false?
>
> --

No, once again, a non-sequitur. You will have to show us how a 'non-
black' outgroup would then translate into blacks not being another
outgroup in that society. And besides, I said "virtually" every
society, and exceptions therefore do not prove the rule. I covered a
lot of this above, and I also notice you love splitting replies
deliberately. It's what some call the Frankfurt school technique and I
have noticed this since the beginning but I played along. I urge you
in the future to try to reply to one post with one reply. I can start
splitting yours and taking things out of context as you have always
done. Do you want to taste some of your own medicine?

> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----