On Jun 1, 6:04 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 06:18:50 +0800,RichAsianKidwrote
> (in article
> <02d4c197-2eec-4f38-983e-c86638e5a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>
>
> > On May 29, 11:58 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> You made a specific claim, (neatly snipped) which I now quote:
"Perhaps
> >>>> that's why blacks are always seen as the "other" in virtually every
> >>>> society." If you have any integrity, you will not admit that this
> statement is
> >>>> false.
> >> Doesn't matter. The "other" is typically found in every society, but
it is
> >> not remotely true that "blacks" are the other (as you claimed).
>
> > Please do tell us precisely how if some non-black group is the
> > outsider automatically translates into "black" not being the outsider.
>
> Well, read carefully now.
>
> You claimed "blacks" are the outsider in "virtually every society". I
have
> given you a sample list (and I am prepared to give you a virtually
endless
> list) of societies in which the others were not "blacks".
>
> You statement is factual disproved.
Hey guess you're right, if there are no blacks around they can't be
the outsider. Out of sight, out of mind. Maybe that's the perfect
solution?
>
> > Careful now, one of your examples is Nazi Germany and there're no
> > dearth of links how blacks were "treated". (Is that why you're not
> > practising law now, not good enough to be a lawyer by the way, not
> > recognizing a non-sequitur?)
>
> Of course the Nazi's also treated homo***uals, gypsies, French,
socialists
> and "blacks" as outsiders.
>
> That is not proof that "virtually every society" treats blacks as
outsiders.
>
> In addition my example from Africa demonstrated that "blacks" are often
> INSIDERS, not "the other".
>
What about Korea?
> >> I can make an endless list of societies in which the other are not
"blacks".
> >> Indeed in some of them "Chinese" are the others.
> >> Pretending that I claim utopia is possible is another one of your
dishonest
> >> debating techniques.
>
> > You do agree that utopia is not possible then, correct?
>
> No perfection. We will never draw a perfect circle or know all the
digits of
> Pi.
>
De Facto Equality.....wooooo....that's your 1960s dream down the
toilet.
> --
> Love, Jim
> (I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
> crossposts.)
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe
#1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
|
